Hoang Bui Hai, Dang Trung Anh, Bui Thi Huong Thao

Tóm tắt

This study was intended to understand how the anaphylaxis patients were diagnosed and treated in the Emergency Department (ED) of Hanoi Medical University Hospital before the Vietnamese Ministry of Health launched the new protocol at the end of 2017. A retrospective crossection observational study was conducted to include 84 cases diagnosed and treated for anaphylaxis. The results showed that 92.7% of diagnosed patients adhered to the protocol set forth by World Allergy Organizationfrom 2011 to 2015, 7.1% of those were found ineligible but still diagnosed with anaphylaxis. Mucocutaneous symptoms were the most common (91.7% of patients), followed by respiratory symptoms (66.67%), reduced BP (50%), neurological symptoms (23.8%) and gastrointestinal symptoms (19%). Epinephrine was used in 97.6% of patients. All the patients were administered Epinephrine IM; 11.9% of patients had to use IV then continuous IV Epinephrine. Other medications/interventions that were used included corticosteroids, antihistamine, fluid infusion, and oxygen therapy. Anaphylaxis resolved in all patients following treatment; there were no severe or fatal cases identified. In conclusion, the diagnosis and treatment of anaphylaxis at Hanoi Medical University Hospital were practically updated to new global guidelines.


Từ khóa

anaphylaxis, Hanoi Medical University Hospital

Toàn văn:


Tài liệu tham khảo

Simons FE., Ardusso LR., Bilo MB et al (2011). World allergy organization guidelines for the assessment and management of anaphylaxis. The World Allergy Organization journal, 4, 13 - 37.

Ma L., Danoff TM., Borish L (2014). Case fatality and population mortality associated with anaphylaxis in the United States. The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 133(4), 1075 - 83.

Decker WW., Campbell RL., Manivannan V et al (2008). The etiology and incidence of anaphylaxis in Rochester, Minnesota: a

report from the Rochester Epidemiology Project. The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology; 122, 1161 - 1165.

Sheikh A., Hippisley-Cox J., Newton J, Fenty J (2008). Trends in national incidence, lifetime prevalence and epinephrine prescribing for anaphylaxis in England. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 101, 139 - 143.

Nguyễn Văn Đoàn, Nguyễn Năng An (1994). Về một số trường hợp sốc phản vệ tử vong do dị ứng thuốc. Kỷ yếu Nghiên cứu Khoa học, Bộ Y tế. Trường Đại học Y Hà Nội, 6, 97.

Nguyễn Văn Đoàn., Nguyễn Thị Thùy Ninh (2015). Tình trạng sốc phản vệ ở bệnh viện Bạch Mai. Tạp chí nghiên cứu Y học, 98, 25 - 27.

Thông tư số 51/2017/TT-BYT Hướng dẫn phòng, chẩn đoán và xử trí phản vệ, Bộ Y tế ban hành ngày 29 tháng 12 năm 2017.

Humphrey RS (2003). Fatal posture in anaphylactic shock. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 112, 451 - 452.

Bridges N., Jarquin-Valdivia AA (2005). Use of Trendelenburg as the resuscitative position: to T or not to T? Am J Crit Care, 14, 364 - 368.

Muraro A., Roberts G., Worm M et al (2014). Anaphylaxis: guidelines from the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. Allergy; 69, 1026 - 1045.