17. Comparison of grace, timi risk scores for prediction of major adverse cardiac events in patients with acute myocardial infarction, Vietnam
Nội dung chính của bài viết
Tóm tắt
Acute myocardial infarction (MI) is one of the leading causes of cardiovascular death and can experience many events during illness. Therefore, many risk prediction scales have been established to stratify patients with acute MI, in which TIMI and GRACE scores are common. We conducted this study to compare the predictability of GRACE and TIMI scores in patients with acute MI within 12 months. A prospective cohort study was performed on 195 patients with acute MI, of which 86 patients had ST elevation (STEMI) and 109 patients without ST elevation (NSTEMI). The study looked at five major events including death, coronary re-intervention, bleeding due to drug use, re-hospitalization, and stroke. As a result, the heart rate in the STEMI group was 83.06 ± 14.78, higher than the heart rate of the NSTEMI group at admission (78.59 ± 10.63), the difference was significant with p = 0.015. The study has not shown the predictive effect of GRACE and TIMI scores on the occurrence of events in patients with acute MI within 12 months. However, the study showed that GRACE can better ability to stratify the risk for the group of subjects that had not yet occurred.
Chi tiết bài viết
Từ khóa
TIMI score, Grace score, Acute Myocardial Infarction.
Tài liệu tham khảo
2. Cullen, L. Greensladea, J. Hammett, et al. Comparison of Three Risk Stratification Rules for Predicting Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Presenting to an Australian Emergency Department. Heart, Lung and Circulation. 22th ed, 2013: 844–851 .
3. Smith, LN. Makam, AN. Darden, et al. Acute Myocardial Infarction Readmission Risk Prediction Models: A Systematic Review Of Model Performance. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018; 11(1): e003885 .
4. Jakimov, T. Mrdovic, I. Filipović, et al. Comparison of RISK-PCI, GRACE, TIMI risk scores for prediction of major adverse cardiac events in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Croat Med J. 2017; 58(6): 406–415.
5. Araújo Gonçalves, P. Ferreira, J. Aguiar, C. Seabra-Gomes, R. TIMI, PURSUIT, and GRACE risk scores: sustained prognostic value and interaction with revascularization in NSTE-ACS. Eur Heart J. 2005; 26(9): 865–872.
6. Morrow, DA. Antman, EM. Parsons, el al. Application of the TIMI risk score for ST-elevation MI in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 3. JAMA. 2001; 286(11): 1356-1359.
7. Granger, CB. Goldberg, RJ. Dabbous, el al. Predictors of hospital mortality in the global registry of acute coronary events. Arch Intern Med. 2003; 163(19): 2345–2353 .
8. Chen, YH. Huang, SS. Lin, SJ. TIMI and GRACE Risk Scores Predict Both Short-Term and Long-Term Outcomes in Chinese Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction. Acta Cardiol Sin. 2018; 34(1): 4–12 .
9. Naqvi, SHR. Abbas, T. Tun, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of TIMI versus GRACE score for prediction of death in patients presenting with Acute Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI). Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. 2019; 4(1): 001–005 .
10. Méndez-Eirín, E. Flores-Ríos, X. García-López, et al. Comparison of the Prognostic Predictive Value of the TIMI, PAMI, CADILLAC, and GRACE Risk Scores in STEACS Undergoing Primary or Rescue PCI. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2012; 65(3): 227–233.
11. Ramsay, G. Podogrodzka, M. McClure, C. Fox, KA. Risk prediction in patients presenting with suspect cardiac pain: the GRACE and TIMI risk scores versus clinical evaluation. QJM. 2007; 100(1): 11–18.
12. Correia, LCL. Garcia, G. Kalil, et al. Prognostic value of GRACE scores versus TIMI score in acute coronary syndromes. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2010; 94(5): 613–619.
13. Rossi, L. Rosa, EM. Guerra, MB. GRACE risk score vs TIMI risk score. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2011; 96(3): 257-258.