Anxiety level in patients with vital signs monitor at Cardiovascular Center, Hanoi Medical University
Nội dung chính của bài viết
Tóm tắt
The Cardiovascular Center at Hanoi Medical University Hospital (HMUH) routinely employs vital signs monitoring systems for patient in severe conditions, post-intervention, and post-cardiothoracic surgery. However, confining patients to their beds often causes significant inconvenience. Additionally, alarm signals from these systems, while crucial for safety, can often be clinically insignificant, leading to patient anxiety. This study aimed to assess the anxiety levels and experiences of patients connected to continuous monitoring systems. Conducted between February and May 2024 at the Cardiovascular Center (HMUH), the cross-sectional study involved 108 patients who had been continuously monitored for at least 24 hours. Data were collected on demographics, reasons for monitoring, alarm frequency, clinical significance of alarms, and anxiety levels using the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS). Results indicated some notable results, continuous monitoring was primarily due to post-cardiovascular interventions (51.9%), a significant majority (96.8%) experienced more than 12 alarms per day, but only 38.7% of these alarms had clinical significance. Anxiety levels were notably high, with 33.4% having anxiety. Major factors contributing to patient discomfort included sound and limitations in personal care. Continuous monitoring significantly impacts patient anxiety and comfort, primarily due to excessive non-significant alarms and restricted mobility.
Chi tiết bài viết
Từ khóa
Continuous monitoring system, anxiety, sound
Tài liệu tham khảo
2. Wu M, Shen L, Wang Q, et al. Anxiety and Depression Prevalence and Risk Factors Among Patients With Cardiovascular Diseases in Post-COVID-19 China. Frontiers in public health. 2021;9:758874.
3. Trinh Thi Thanh Tuyen NTML. Anxiety status of patients within 24 hours after coronary intervention at Hanoi Medical University Hospital. Journal of Nursing Science. 2023;6:97-103.
4. Zhao F, Sun Z, Niu W. Effect of Ward Noise Reduction Technology Combined with Music Therapy on Negative Emotions in Inpatients Undergoing Gastric Cancer Radiotherapy: A Retrospective Study. Noise & health. Oct-Dec 2023;25(119):257-263.
5. Xue Y, Lu B, He Y, et al. Evaluation on the Effect of Ward-Noise Reduction Management Combined with Monitoring-Training-Planning Management Mode in Hospitalized Patients with Heart Failure. Noise & health. Jan-Mar 01 2024;26(120):30-36.
6. Bayani B, Yousefi S, Bayani M, et al. Depression and Anxiety in a Cardiovascular Outpatient Clinic: A descriptive study. Iranian journal of psychiatry. 2011;6(3):125-127.
7. Gungor Serap M, Oztunc Gursel. Effects of Noise on Vital Signs and Anxiety Levels of Patients Hospitalized in the General Surgery Intensive Care Unit. International Journal of Caring Sciences. 2021;14( Issue 1):79.
8. Akan Z, Yilmaz A, Özdemir O, et al. P-436 - Noise Pollution, Psychiatric Symptoms and Quality of Life: Noise Problem in the East Region of Turkey. European Psychiatry. 2020;27(S1):1-1.
9. Areia C, King E. Experiences of current vital signs monitoring practices and views of wearable monitoring: A qualitative study in patients and nurses. J Adv Nurs. Mar 2022;78(3):810-822.