Clinical and paraclinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients with minor stroke admitted within the first 4.5 hours
Nội dung chính của bài viết
Tóm tắt
The optimal therapeutic approach for patients with minor stroke presenting within 4.5 hours of symptom onset remains a subject of ongoing debate, particularly regarding the efficacy and safety of intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase compared to single (SAPT) or dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). We conducted a single-center, observational cohort study involving patients with acute minor stroke (NIHSS ≤ 5) who were admitted within 4.5 hours to the Stroke Center of Bach Mai Hospital. Patients were stratified into three treatment groups: intravenous alteplase, DAPT, and SAPT. The primary outcome was a favorable functional incidence at 90 days, defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0–1. The results show that among 186 patients (34 alteplase, 119 DAPT, 33 SAPT), the proportions achieving mRS 0–1 at day 90 were 90.4% (79.4%, 96.7%, and 78.8%, respectively). The alteplase group demonstrated a higher baseline NIHSS score (median 4 [IQR: 3.75 – 5]) than the DAPT and SAPT groups (both with a median of 2; p < 0.001). Early neurological deterioration (END) occurred in 38.2% of the alteplase group, 18.2% of the SAPT group, and 0.8% of the DAPT group. END was an associated factor with unfavorable outcomes (mRS 2–6), with an adjusted odds ratio of 2.14 (95% CI: 1.25 – 3.68; p < 0.01). In this single-center observational study, 90.4% of patients with minor stroke achieved favorable functional outcomes at 90th day. The rates of favorable outcomes in the DAPT, alteplase, and SAPT groups were 96.7%, 79.4%, and 78.8%, respectively. Patients treated with alteplase had higher baseline NIHSS scores and a greater frequency of early neurological deterioration, which was associated with poor functional outcomes at 90 days.
Chi tiết bài viết
Từ khóa
Minor stroke, thrombolysis, dual antiplatelet, single antiplatelet, first 4.5 hours
Tài liệu tham khảo
2. Berge E, Whiteley W, Audebert H, et al. European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guidelines on intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke. Eur Stroke J. 2021;6(1):I-LXII. doi:10.1177/2396987321989865
3. Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, et al. Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2019;50(12):e344-e418. doi:10.1161/STR.0000000000000211
4. Romano JG, Gardener H, Campo-Bustillo I, et al. Predictors of Outcomes in Patients With Mild Ischemic Stroke Symptoms: MaRISS. Stroke. 2021;52(6):1995-2004. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.032809
5. Sung SM, Kang YJ, Cho HJ, et al. Prediction of early neurological deterioration in acute minor ischemic stroke by machine learning algorithms. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2020;195:105892. doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105892
6. Dawson J, Béjot Y, Christensen LM, et al. European Stroke Organisation (eso) Guideline on Pharmacological Interventions for Long-Term Secondary Prevention After Ischaemic Stroke or Transient Ischaemic Attack. Eur Stroke J. 2022;7(3):I-XLI. doi:10.1177/23969873221100032
7. Kleindorfer DO, Towfighi A, Chaturvedi S, et al. 2021 Guideline for the Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2021;52(7):e364-e467. doi:10.1161/STR.0000000000000375
8. Khatri P, Kleindorfer DO, Devlin T, et al. Effect of Alteplase vs Aspirin on Functional Outcome for Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke and Minor Nondisabling Neurologic Deficits: The PRISMS Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2018;320(2):156-166. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.8496
9. Chen HS, Cui Y, Zhou ZH, et al. Dual Antiplatelet Therapy vs Alteplase for Patients With Minor Nondisabling Acute Ischemic Stroke: The ARAMIS Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2023;329(24):2135-2144. doi:10.1001/jama.2023.7827
10. Turc G, Bhogal P, Fischer U, et al. European Stroke Organisation (ESO) - European Society for Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy (ESMINT) Guidelines on Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke. J NeuroInterventional Surg. Published online March 1, 2019. doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014569
11. Banks JL, Marotta CA. Outcomes Validity and Reliability of the Modified Rankin Scale: Implications for Stroke Clinical Trials. Stroke. 2007;38(3):1091-1096. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000258355.23810.c6
12. Bluhmki E, Chamorro Á, Dávalos A, et al. Stroke treatment with alteplase given 3·0–4·5 h after onset of acute ischaemic stroke (ECASS III): additional outcomes and subgroup analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8(12):1095-1102. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70264-9
13. Adams HP, Bendixen BH, Kappelle LJ, et al. Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. TOAST. Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment. Stroke. 1993;24(1):35-41. doi:10.1161/01.STR.24.1.35
14. Tu WJX Yicheng, Liu Yakun, Li Jilai, et al. Intravenous Thrombolysis or Medical Management for Minor Strokes. Thromb Haemost. 2023;123(07):734-743. doi:10.1055/s-0043-1768150
15. Duan C, Xiong Y, Gu HQ, et al. Outcomes in minor stroke patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2023;29(8):2308-2317. doi:10.1111/cns.14164
16. Luo X, Huo T, Cao P, et al. Thrombolysis Versus Nonthrombolyzed in Patients With Mild Strokes and Large Vessel Occlusions: Results of a Multicenter Stroke Registration. The Neurologist. 2024;29(1):31. doi:10.1097/NRL.0000000000000516
17. Moawad MHED, Salem T, Alaaeldin A, et al. Safety and efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 93,057 minor stroke patients. BMC Neurol. 2025;25(1):33. doi:10.1186/s12883-024-04000-8
18. Broccolini A, Brunetti V, Colò F, et al. Early neurological deterioration in patients with minor stroke due to isolated M2 occlusion undergoing medical management: a retrospective multicenter study. J NeuroInterventional Surg. 2024;16(1):38-44. doi:10.1136/jnis-2023-020118