Evaluation of acute and subchronic toxicities of DEHEMA product in experimental animals

Pham Thi Ngoc Bich, Dang Truc Quynh, Nguyen Thi Thu Ha

Nội dung chính của bài viết

Tóm tắt

This research was conducted to evaluate the acute and sub-chronic toxicities of the DEHEMA product through oral administration using experimental animal models. The acute toxicity of DEHEMA was determined in Swiss mice using the Litchfield-Wilcoxon method. The subchronic toxicity of DEHEMA was assessed in Wistar rats according to WHO and OECD’s recommendations with oral doses of 10 mL/kg b.w./day (equivalent to the recommended human dose with conversion ratio 6) and 30 mL/kg b.w./day (3 times of the recommended human dose) for 30 consecutive days. In terms of acute toxicity, the DEHEMA product did not show acute toxicity in mice at the highest dose used (100 mL/kg b.w). In terms of subchronic toxicity, after oral administration of aqueous extract form of DEHEMA at 5.2 g/kg b.w./day and 15.6 g/kg b.w./day, the overall condition, weight, hematological parameters, liver and renal functions, and microscopic images of liver and kidney were unchanged in the treatment groups compared to those of the control group. In conclusion, DEHEMA did not produce acute and subchronic toxicities in Swiss mice and Wistar rats.

Chi tiết bài viết

Tài liệu tham khảo

1. World Health Organization. WHO global report on traditional and complementary medicine 2019. Geneva. 2019. License: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
2. Jităreanu A, Trifan A, Vieriu M, et al. Current Trends in Toxicity Assessment of Herbal Medicines: A Narrative Review. Processes. 2023; 11(1):83. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11010083
3. Saganuwan S. Toxicity studies of drugs and chemicals in animals: An overview. Bulg J Vet Med. 2017; 20:291-318. doi:10.15547/ bjvm.983.
4. Jong WH, Carraway J, Re G. In vivo and in vitro testing for the biological safety evaluation of biomaterials and medical devices. Biocompat Perform Med Devices. 2012;120-158. doi:10.1016/ B978-0-85709-070-6.50007-9.
5. Zhao Y-L, Su M, Shang J-H, et al. Acute and Chronic Toxicity of Indole Alkaloids from Leaves of Alstonia scholaris (L.) R. Br. in Mice and Rats. Nat Prod Bioprospecting. 2020;10(2):77-88. doi:10.1007/s13659-020- 00237-1.
6. OECD. Guidelines for the testing of chemicals repeated dose oral toxicity study in rodents. Environmental Health and Safety Monograph Series on Testing and Assessment No 407; 2008.
7. World Health Organization. Guidelines for Assessing Quality of Herbal Medicines with Reference to Contaminants and Residues. World Health Organization. Geneva; 2007.
8. Litchfield JT, Wilcoxon FA. A simplified method of evaluating dose-effect experiments. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1949; 96: 99-113.
9. OECD. Guidance Document on Acute Oral Toxicity Testing. OECD. 2002. doi:10.1787/9789264078413-en
10. Ramaiah SK. Preclinical safety assessment: current gaps. challenges. and approaches in identifying translatable biomarkers of drug-induced liver injury. Clin Lab Med. 2011;31(1):161-172. doi:10.1016/j.cll.2010.10.004
11. Saganuwan SA. Toxicity studies of drugs and chemicals in animals: an overview. Bulgarian Journal of Veterinary Medicine. 2017; 4(20): 291-318.
12. Omar A, Elmesallamy Gel-S, Eassa S. Comparative study of the hepatotoxic. genotoxic and carcinogenic effects of praziquantel distocide & the natural myrrh extract Mirazid on adult male albino rats. J Egypt Soc Parasitol. 2005;35(1):313-329.
13. Singh P, Chacko KM, Aggarwal ML, et al. A-90 Day Gavage Safety Assessment of Boswellia serrata in Rats. Toxicol Int. 2012;19(3):273-278. doi:10.4103/0971-6580. 103668