Overview of prognostic models for major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome

Nguyen Thanh Dung

Nội dung chính của bài viết

Tóm tắt

Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) represent a key outcome in the management of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), requiring prognostic models with strong performance and standardized reporting. This review summarizes studies published from 2000 to 2025 investigating models predicting MACE in ACS, including classical clinical scores, biomarker-based models, nomograms, and machine learning approaches. Traditional models reported moderate discrimination for the TIMI score (C-statistic = 0.65) and higher accuracy for GRACE 2.0 (C = 0.75-0.81). In post-intervention cohorts, the CADILLAC, ACTION, and CAMI scores achieved C = 0.80-0.90. Biomarker-integrated models demonstrated improved performance, with BIPass showing C = 0.79 (95% CI 0.73-0.85). Nomogram-based tools predicting 6-24-month or post-PCI MACE reported AUC = 0.79-0.89. Machine learning models, including deep neural networks and long short-term memory algorithms using dynamic hs-troponin and ECG data, achieved AUC > 0.90 for short-term MACE prediction in emergency department chest-pain cohorts. The findings provide a quantitative overview of the prognostic performance of MACE prediction models in patients with ACS. Overall, the GRACE score remains the cornerstone of risk stratification in NSTEMI-ACS, while nomogram-based and machine learning models show substantial potential for individualized prognostication, and still require local recalibration and external validation to establish their clinical applicability.

Chi tiết bài viết

Tài liệu tham khảo

1. Timmis A, Kazakiewicz D, Townsend N, Huculeci R, Aboyans V, Vardas P. Global epidemiology of acute coronary syndromes. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2023; 20(11): 778-788. doi:10.1038/s41569-023-00884-0.
2. Zhu XY, Jiang ZM, Li X, Su FF, Tian JW. Establishment and validation of post-PCI nomogram in elderly patients with acute coronary syndromes. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025;12:1529476. Published 2025 Mar 7. doi:10.3389/fcvm.2025.1529476.
3. Abu-Assi E, López-López A, González-Salvado V, et al. The Risk of Cardiovascular Events After an Acute Coronary Event Remains High, Especially During the First Year, Despite Revascularization. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2016; 69(1): 11-18. doi:10.1016/j.rec.2015.06.015.
4. Chopannejad S, Sadoughi F, Bagherzadeh R, Shekarchi S. Predicting Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Scoping Review of Machine Learning Approaches. Appl Clin Inform. 2022; 13(3): 720-740. doi: https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1863-1589.
5. Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023; 44(38): 3720-3826. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehad191.
6. Rao SV, O’Donoghue ML, Ruel M, et al. 2025 ACC/AHA/ACEP/NAEMSP/SCAI Guideline for the Management of Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2025; 151(13): e771-e862. doi: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001309.
7. Song, C., Fu, R., Dou, K. et al. The CAMI-score: A Novel Tool derived From CAMI Registry to Predict In-hospital Death among Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients. Sci Rep 8, 9082 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26861-z.
8. Antman EM, Cohen M, Bernink PJ, et al. The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non-ST elevation MI: A method for prognostication and therapeutic decision making. JAMA. 2000; 284(7): 835-842. doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.284.7.835.
9. Eagle KA, Lim MJ, Dabbous OH, et al. A validated prediction model for all forms of acute coronary syndrome: estimating the risk of 6-month postdischarge death in an international registry. JAMA. 2004; 291(22): 2727-2733. doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.291.22.2727.
10. Méndez-Eirín E, Flores-Ríos X, García-López F, et al. Comparison of the prognostic predictive value of the TIMI, PAMI, CADILLAC, and GRACE risk scores in STEACS undergoing primary or rescue PCI. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2012; 65(3): 227-233. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recesp.2011.10.019.
11. Bai L, Li YM, Yang BS, et al. Performance of the Risk Scores for Predicting In-Hospital Mortality in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome in a Chinese Cohort. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023; 24(12): 356. Published 2023 Dec 19. doi: https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2412356.
12. Kassaian SE, Saroukhani S, Alaeddini F, et al. A Risk-Scoring Model to Predict One-year Major Adverse Cardiac Events after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. J Tehran Heart Cent. 2015; 10(4): 167-175.
13. Batra G, Lindbäck J, Becker RC, et al. Biomarker-Based Prediction of Recurrent Ischemic Events in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022; 80(18): 1735-1747. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2022.08.767.
14. Wang J, Gao W, Chen G, et al. Biomarker-based risk model to predict cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndromes - Results from BIPass registry. Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2022; 25:100479. Published 2022 May 30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanwpc.2022.100479.
15. Wang J, Wu X, Sun J, et al. Prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome: Development and validation of a non-invasive nomogram model based on autonomic nervous system assessment. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9:1053470. Published 2022 Nov 3. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.1053470.
16. Kong, S., Chen, C., Zheng, G. et al. A prognostic nomogram for long-term major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome after percutaneous coronary intervention. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 21, 253 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-021-02051-0.