Clinical outcomes of modified widman flap surgery with and without adjunctive emdogain in anterior maxillary periodontitis: Randomized split-mouth clinical trial

Dinh Thi Thuy, Tran Van Dung, Phan Thi Bay, Do Thi Thao

Nội dung chính của bài viết

Tóm tắt

Modified Widman flap is a well-established surgical treatment for advanced periodontitis. However, its regenerative potential remains limited, prompting the adjunctive use of Emdogain to improve clinical outcomes. This randomized split-mouth clinical trial evaluated the adjunctive use of Emdogain in anterior maxillary periodontitis at Ho Chi Minh City Odonto-Stomatology Hospital from July 2025 to March 2026. A total of 34 patients with 128 maxillary anterior teeth were included, with comparable baseline probing pocket depth (PPD) and clinical attachment level (CAL) between groups. At 1 month, both parameters were significantly reduced in the Emdogain group (p < 0.001). At 3 months, Emdogain achieved greater mean PPD (3.68 ± 0.64 mm vs 4.52 ± 0.72 mm) and CAL (4.08 ± 0.68 mm vs 4.52 ± 0.72 mm), with p < 0.001. Pocket closure was more frequent in the Emdogain group at both 1 and 3 months. Plaque index (PI) and gingival index (GI) improved significantly in both groups without significant between-group differences. Pain on day 7 was lower in the Emdogain group, and the proportion of good outcomes at 3 months was higher (76.2% vs 52.4%, p = 0.020). In conclusion, adjunctive Emdogain provided additional some clinical benefits when used in conjunction with modified Widman flap surgery in patients with anterior maxillary periodontitis in short-term.

Chi tiết bài viết

Tài liệu tham khảo

1. GBD 2016 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. 2017, 390(10100): 1211-1259. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32154-2.
2. Varshney SKR, Siddharth M. Effects of low-level diode laser therapy as an adjunct to modified Widman flap in subjects with stage III periodontitis: a clinical study. SRM J Res Dent Sci. 2024, 15(4): 182-190. doi: 10.4103/srmjrds.srmjrds_22_24.
3. Kulakauskienė R, Aukštakalnis R, Šadzevičienė R. Enamel matrix derivate induces periodontal regeneration by activating growth factors: a review. Stomatologija. 2020, 22(2): 49-53.
4. Fidan I, Labreuche J, Huck O, Agossa K. Combination of enamel matrix derivatives with bone graft vs bone graft alone in the treatment of periodontal intrabony and furcation defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2024, 22: 655-664. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.b5871494.
5. Nibali L, Koidou VP, Nieri M, Barbato L, Pagliaro U, Cairo F. Regenerative surgery versus access flap for the treatment of intra-bony periodontal defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2020, 47 Suppl 22:320-351. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13237.
6. Dong Thi Mai Huong. Clinical outcome post surgery for treatment of chronic periodotal with enamel matrix derivatives - Emdogain. J Med Res. 2020, 132(8): 46-54. doi: 10.52852/tcncyh.v132i8.1568 .
7. Nguyen Thi Hong Minh, Dong Thi Mai Huong, Nguyen Thi Phuong Tra. Result of periodontal regeneration using Emdogain. Vietnam Med J. 2022, 515(2): 39-42. doi: 10.51298/vmj.v515i2.2751.
8. Nguyen Thi Thanh Ngoc, Nguyen Thu Thuy, Pham Anh Vu Thuy. Clinical efficacy of enamel matrix derivative in treatment of periodontal intra-bony defects. VNUHCM J Health Sci. 2021, 2(2): 155-161. doi: 10.32508/stdjhs.v2i2.462.
9. Froum SJ, Weinberg MA, Rosenberg E, Tarnow D. A comparative study utilizing open flap debridement with and without enamel matrix derivative in the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects: a 12-month re-entry study. J Periodontol. 2001, 72(1): 25-34. doi: 10.1902/jop.2001.72.1.25.
10. De Ry SP, Roccuzzo A, Lang NP, Sculean A, Salvi GE. Long-term clinical outcomes of periodontal regeneration with enamel matrix derivative: A retrospective cohort study with a mean follow-up of 10 years. J Periodontol. 2022, 93(4): 548-559. doi: 10.1002/JPER.21-0347.
11. Lee JH, Kim DH, Jeong SN. Adjunctive use of enamel matrix derivatives to porcine-derived xenograft for the treatment of one-wall intrabony defects: two-year longitudinal results of a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Periodontol. 2020, 91(7): 880-889. doi: 10.1002/JPER.19-0432.
12. McGuire MK, Nunn M. Evaluation of human recession defects treated with coronally advanced flaps and either enamel matrix derivative or connective tissue. Part 1: Comparison of clinical parameters. J Periodontol. 2003, 74(8): 1110-1125. doi: 10.1902/jop.2003.74.8.1110.
13. Cortellini P, Tonetti MS. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of the modified minimally invasive surgical technique with and without regenerative materials: a randomized-controlled trial in intra-bony defects. J Clin Periodontol. 2011; 38(4): 365-373. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01705.x.
14. Okuda K, Momose M, Miyazaki A, et al. Enamel matrix derivative in the treatment of human intrabony osseous defects. J Periodontol. 2000, 71(12): 1821-1828. doi: 10.1902/jop.2000.71.12.1821.