Clinical outcomes of modified widman flap surgery with and without adjunctive emdogain in anterior maxillary periodontitis: Randomized split-mouth clinical trial
Nội dung chính của bài viết
Tóm tắt
Modified Widman flap is a well-established surgical treatment for advanced periodontitis. However, its regenerative potential remains limited, prompting the adjunctive use of Emdogain to improve clinical outcomes. This randomized split-mouth clinical trial evaluated the adjunctive use of Emdogain in anterior maxillary periodontitis at Ho Chi Minh City Odonto-Stomatology Hospital from July 2025 to March 2026. A total of 34 patients with 128 maxillary anterior teeth were included, with comparable baseline probing pocket depth (PPD) and clinical attachment level (CAL) between groups. At 1 month, both parameters were significantly reduced in the Emdogain group (p < 0.001). At 3 months, Emdogain achieved greater mean PPD (3.68 ± 0.64 mm vs 4.52 ± 0.72 mm) and CAL (4.08 ± 0.68 mm vs 4.52 ± 0.72 mm), with p < 0.001. Pocket closure was more frequent in the Emdogain group at both 1 and 3 months. Plaque index (PI) and gingival index (GI) improved significantly in both groups without significant between-group differences. Pain on day 7 was lower in the Emdogain group, and the proportion of good outcomes at 3 months was higher (76.2% vs 52.4%, p = 0.020). In conclusion, adjunctive Emdogain provided additional some clinical benefits when used in conjunction with modified Widman flap surgery in patients with anterior maxillary periodontitis in short-term.
Chi tiết bài viết
Từ khóa
Periodontitis, modified Widman flap, Emdogain, periodontal regeneration
Tài liệu tham khảo
2. Varshney SKR, Siddharth M. Effects of low-level diode laser therapy as an adjunct to modified Widman flap in subjects with stage III periodontitis: a clinical study. SRM J Res Dent Sci. 2024, 15(4): 182-190. doi: 10.4103/srmjrds.srmjrds_22_24.
3. Kulakauskienė R, Aukštakalnis R, Šadzevičienė R. Enamel matrix derivate induces periodontal regeneration by activating growth factors: a review. Stomatologija. 2020, 22(2): 49-53.
4. Fidan I, Labreuche J, Huck O, Agossa K. Combination of enamel matrix derivatives with bone graft vs bone graft alone in the treatment of periodontal intrabony and furcation defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2024, 22: 655-664. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.b5871494.
5. Nibali L, Koidou VP, Nieri M, Barbato L, Pagliaro U, Cairo F. Regenerative surgery versus access flap for the treatment of intra-bony periodontal defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2020, 47 Suppl 22:320-351. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13237.
6. Dong Thi Mai Huong. Clinical outcome post surgery for treatment of chronic periodotal with enamel matrix derivatives - Emdogain. J Med Res. 2020, 132(8): 46-54. doi: 10.52852/tcncyh.v132i8.1568 .
7. Nguyen Thi Hong Minh, Dong Thi Mai Huong, Nguyen Thi Phuong Tra. Result of periodontal regeneration using Emdogain. Vietnam Med J. 2022, 515(2): 39-42. doi: 10.51298/vmj.v515i2.2751.
8. Nguyen Thi Thanh Ngoc, Nguyen Thu Thuy, Pham Anh Vu Thuy. Clinical efficacy of enamel matrix derivative in treatment of periodontal intra-bony defects. VNUHCM J Health Sci. 2021, 2(2): 155-161. doi: 10.32508/stdjhs.v2i2.462.
9. Froum SJ, Weinberg MA, Rosenberg E, Tarnow D. A comparative study utilizing open flap debridement with and without enamel matrix derivative in the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects: a 12-month re-entry study. J Periodontol. 2001, 72(1): 25-34. doi: 10.1902/jop.2001.72.1.25.
10. De Ry SP, Roccuzzo A, Lang NP, Sculean A, Salvi GE. Long-term clinical outcomes of periodontal regeneration with enamel matrix derivative: A retrospective cohort study with a mean follow-up of 10 years. J Periodontol. 2022, 93(4): 548-559. doi: 10.1002/JPER.21-0347.
11. Lee JH, Kim DH, Jeong SN. Adjunctive use of enamel matrix derivatives to porcine-derived xenograft for the treatment of one-wall intrabony defects: two-year longitudinal results of a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Periodontol. 2020, 91(7): 880-889. doi: 10.1002/JPER.19-0432.
12. McGuire MK, Nunn M. Evaluation of human recession defects treated with coronally advanced flaps and either enamel matrix derivative or connective tissue. Part 1: Comparison of clinical parameters. J Periodontol. 2003, 74(8): 1110-1125. doi: 10.1902/jop.2003.74.8.1110.
13. Cortellini P, Tonetti MS. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of the modified minimally invasive surgical technique with and without regenerative materials: a randomized-controlled trial in intra-bony defects. J Clin Periodontol. 2011; 38(4): 365-373. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01705.x.
14. Okuda K, Momose M, Miyazaki A, et al. Enamel matrix derivative in the treatment of human intrabony osseous defects. J Periodontol. 2000, 71(12): 1821-1828. doi: 10.1902/jop.2000.71.12.1821.