Article Sidebar

PDF (Tiếng Việt)
Published: 2021-06-30
Abstract Views: 190
Views PDF (Tiếng Việt): 306
DOI: https://doi.org/10.52852/tcncyh.v142i6.170
Issue
Vol. 142 No. 6 (2021)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Phương, V. H., & Vân, N. T. (2021). Comparision of changes in indirect calorimetry of PSV mode versus SIMV mode in patients with mechanical ventilator discontinuation post surgery. Journal of Medical Research, 142(6), 21-27. https://doi.org/10.52852/tcncyh.v142i6.170

Comparision of changes in indirect calorimetry of PSV mode versus SIMV mode in patients with mechanical ventilator discontinuation post surgery

Vũ Hoàng Phương, Nguyễn Thị Vân

Main Article Content

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare changes in indirect calorimetry indices of PSV mode compared to SIMV mode in patients with postoperative mechanical ventilator discontinuation. 70 patients weaned from mechanical ventilation after surgery were divided into 2 groups: 35 patients with PSV mode and 35 patients with SIMV mode at the Department of Anesthesia Critical Care and Pain Management, Hanoi Medical University Hospital from December 2019 to July 2020. Changes in indirect calorimetry indices (VO2, VCO2, REE) from controlled ventilation to PSV and SIMV mode were recorded at 30 minutes, 60 minutes and 90 minutes. In the SIMV group, VO2, REE increased statistically significantly compared to the PSV group when switching from A/C mode to PSV or SIMV mode. Our study shows that the SIMV patients may require more respiratory effort than the PSV patients when mechanical ventilator was discontinued after surgery.


 

Article Details

Keywords

mechanical ventilator discontinuation, SIMV, PSV, indirect calorimetry.

References

1. Boles JM BJ, Connors A, et al. . Weaning from mechanical ventilation. . Eur Respir J. 2007;29(5):1033 - 1056.
2. Brochard L RA BS, et al. Comparison of three methods of gradual withdrawal from ventilatory support during weaning from mechanical ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994;150(4):896-903.
3. Esteban A FF TM, et al. A comparison of four methods of weaning patients from mechanical ventilation. Spanish Lung Failure Collaborative Group. N Engl J Med 1995;332(6):345-350.
4. Leung P JA TM. Comparison of assisted ventilator modes on triggering, patient effort, and dyspnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997;155(6):1940-1948.
5. Mitsuoka M KK, Johnson FW, Burns DM. . Utility of measurements of oxygen cost of breathing in predicting success or failure in trials of reduced mechanical ventilatory support. . Respir Care. 46(9):902 - 910.
6. Boles JM, Bion J, Connors A, et al. Weaning from mechanical ventilation. Eur Respir J. May 2007;29(5)(5):1033-56. doi:10.1183/09031936.00010206
7. Gupta RD RR, Venkatesan P, Anoop S, Joseph M, Thomas N. I ndirect Calorimetry: From Bench to Bedside. Indian J Endocrinol Metab 2017;21(4):594-599.
8. El-Khatib M B-KP ZS, Kanj N, Abi-Saad G, Jamaleddine G. Metabolic and respiratory variables during pressure support versus synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation. Respiration 2009;77(2):154-159.
9. Çakar N TA, Köprülü Ĝ, Esen F, Telci L, Keseciğlu J. . Short Term Effects of SIMV and PSV on Work of Breathing by Pulmonary Monitor CP-100 (Bicore). Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 1996;388:647-653.
10. Chao DC SD, Stearn-Hassenpflug M. . Patient-ventilator trigger asynchrony in prolonged mechanical ventilation. Chest. 1997;112(6):1592-1599.
11. Marini JJ RR, Lamb V. The inspiratory workload of patient-initiated mechanical ventilation. . Am Rev Respir Dis. 1986;134(5):902-909.
12. Brochard L HA, Lorino H, Lemaire F. Inspiratory pressure support prevents diaphragmatic fatigue during weaning from mechanical ventilation. . The American Review of Respiratory Disease 1989;139(2):513-521.