14. Treatment of genital prolapse with laparoscopic pectopexy
Main Article Content
Abstract
The study aimed to evaluate the initial results of laparoscopic pectopexy in the treatment of genital prolapse. 32 patients with grade III and IV genital prolapse underwent surgery within 18 months. The rates of intraoperative and postoperative complications were low at 3.1% and 6.2%, respectively. Recurrence rate was 3.1%. Postoperative pain levels were primarily moderate and low. Patients recovered swiftly with a short hospital stay averaging 4 to 5 days. Quality of life changed clearly after surgery, with the PFDI and PFIQ scores decreasing from 112.51 to 18.75 and 95.21 to 13.54, respectively. Initial results show this is a safe and effective method.
Article Details
Keywords
Genital prolapse, laparoscopic pectopexy
References
2. Petros PEP, Woodman PJ. The Integral Theory of continence. Int Urogynecology J. 2008;19(1):35-40. doi:10.1007/s00192-007-04 75-9
3. Aubé M, Tu LM. Current trends and future perspectives in pelvic reconstructive surgery. Womens Health. 2018;14:1745506518776498. doi:10.1177/1745506518776498
4. Pan K, Zhang Y, Wang Y, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of conventional laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet Off Organ Int Fed Gynaecol Obstet. 2016;132(3):284-291. doi:10.1016/j.ijg o.2015.08.008
5. Coolen ALWM, van Oudheusden AMJ, Mol BWJ, et al. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy compared with open abdominal sacrocolpopexy for vault prolapse repair: a randomised controlled trial. Int Urogynecology J. 2017;28(10):1469-1479. doi:10.1007/s00192-017-3296-5
6. Sarlos D, Kots L, Ryu G, et al. Long-term follow-up of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Int Urogynecology J. 2014;25(9):1207-1212. doi:10.1007/s00192-014-2369-y
7. Ganatra AM, Rozet F, Sanchez-Salas R, et al. The current status of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a review. Eur Urol. 2009;55(5):1089-1103. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.20 09.01.048
8. Winget VL, Gabra MG, Addis IB, et al. Laparoscopic pectopexy for patients with intraabdominal adhesions, lumbar spinal procedures, and other contraindications to sacrocolpopexy: a case series. AJOG Glob Rep. 2022;2(2):100034. doi:10.1016/j.xagr.202 1.100034
9. Karslı A, Karslı O, Kale A. Laparoscopic Pectopexy: An Effective Procedure for Pelvic Organ Prolapse with an Evident Improvement on Quality of Life. Prague Med Rep. 2021;122(1):25-33. doi:10.14712/23362936.2021.3
10. Szymczak P, Grzybowska ME, Sawicki S, et al. Laparoscopic Pectopexy-CUSUM Learning Curve and Perioperative Complications Analysis. J Clin Med. 2021;10(5):1052. doi:10.3390/jcm10051052
11. Banerjee C, Noé KG. Laparoscopic pectopexy: a new technique of prolapse surgery for obese patients. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011;284(3):631-635. doi:10.1007/s00404-010 -1687-7
12. Kale A, Biler A, Terzi H, et al. Laparoscopic pectopexy: initial experience of single center with a new technique for apical prolapse surgery. Int Braz J Urol Off J Braz Soc Urol. 2017;43(5):903-909. doi:10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2017.0070
13. Noé KG, Schiermeier S, Alkatout I, et al. Laparoscopic pectopexy: a prospective, randomized, comparative clinical trial of standard laparoscopic sacral colpocervicopexy with the new laparoscopic pectopexy-postoperative results and intermediate-term follow-up in a pilot study. J Endourol. 2015;29(2):210-215. doi:10.1089/end.2014.0413
14. Salem HT, Tawfik RM, El Saman AM, et al. Anterior abdominal wall cervicopexy for treatment of stage III and stage IV uterine prolapse. Int J Gynaecol Obstet Off Organ Int Fed Gynaecol Obstet. 2010;110(2):130-132. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.03.025