Addressing verification bias in masld screening: A bayesian latent class evaluation of FIB-4 and apri in a low-prevalence occupational cohort
Nội dung chính của bài viết
Tóm tắt
Non-invasive tests (NITs), such as the Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index and the AST to Platelet Ratio Index (APRI), are recommended for stratifying risk of advanced fibrosis in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), yet their true diagnostic accuracy in primary care is often obscured by verification bias. This study evaluated the operational yield and model-based diagnostic performance of these NITs in a low-prevalence occupational health-check cohort of 238 adults. Operational analysis revealed high overall rule-out yields using pre-specified low-risk thresholds (FIB-4 < 1.30: 93.3%; APRI < 0.50: 92.4%), although the FIB-4 yield declined precipitously in patients aged >60 years old (28.6%). To compensate for the absence of a histological reference standard, a Bayesian Latent Class Analysis (LCA) adjusting for conditional dependence was employed, estimating a true advanced fibrosis prevalence of 2.6% (95% CrI: 0.5%-7.3%). Adjusted for correlated errors, FIB-4 demonstrated superior sensitivity compared to APRI (73.1% vs. 57.8%) while maintaining comparable specificity (92.7% vs. 91.8%). Furthermore, Decision Curve Analysis confirmed that an FIB-4 guided triage strategy maximizes net clinical benefit across relevant threshold probabilities. These findings indicate that FIB-4 is a highly efficient primary care gatekeeping tool, superior to APRI, provided age-adjusted thresholds are applied to older adults.
Chi tiết bài viết
Từ khóa
APRI, Bayesian latent class analysis, Decision curve analysis, FIB-4, MASLD
Tài liệu tham khảo
2. Younossi ZM, Paik JM, Golabi P. Epidemiology of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. Clinical and Molecular Hepatology. 2024; 30(Suppl 1): S1-S15.
3. Le P, Tatar M, Dasarathy S, et al. Estimated Burden of Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease in US Adults, 2020 to 2050. JAMA Netw Open. Jan 2 2025; 8(1): e2454707. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.54707.
4. Rinella ME, Lazarus JV, Ratziu V, et al. A multisociety Delphi consensus statement on new fatty liver disease nomenclature. Ann Hepatol. Jan-Feb 2024; 29(1): 101133. doi:10.1016/j.aohep.2023.101133.
5. Rinella ME, Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Siddiqui MS, et al. AASLD Practice Guidance on the clinical assessment and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. Mar 17 2023;doi:10.1097/HEP.0000000000000323.
6. European Association for the Study of the L, European Association for the Study of D, European Association for the Study of O. EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). Journal of Hepatology. 2024; 81(3): 492-542.
7. Sterling RK, Lissen E, Clumeck N, Sola R, Correa MC, Montaner J. Development of a simple noninvasive index to predict significant fibrosis in patients with HIV/HCV coinfection. Hepatology. 2006; 43(6): 1317-1325.
8. Wai CT, Greenson JK, Fontana RJ, Kalbfleisch JD, Marrero JA, Conjeevaram HS. A simple noninvasive index can predict both significant fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology. 2003; 38(2): 518-526.
9. Albert PS, Dodd LE. A cautionary note on the robustness of latent class models for estimating diagnostic error without a gold standard. Biometrics. 2004; 60(2): 427-435.
10. Subtil A. Detecting departures from the conditional independence assumption in diagnostic latent class models: a simulation study. Research methodology modeling. 2024; 24(1): 45-58.
11. Dendukuri N, Hadgu A, Wang L. Modeling conditional dependence between diagnostic tests: a multiple latent variable model. Statistics in Medicine. 2009; 28(3): 441-461.
12. Vickers AJ, Elkin EB. Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models. Medical Decision Making. 2006; 26(6): 565-574.
13. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig L. STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. BMJ. 2015; 351: h5527.
14. American Diabetes A. Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD) in People With Diabetes: The Need for Screening and Early Intervention. A Consensus Report of the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. 2025; 48(7): 1057-1075.
15. El-Kordi A. Identifying and managing liver disease in primary care. BMJ. 2025; 391:r2332.
16. Park H, Yoon EL, Kim M, et al. Cost-effectiveness of advanced hepatic fibrosis screening in individuals with suspected MASLD identified by serologic noninvasive tests. Sci Rep. Jul 7 2025; 15(1): 24186. doi:10.1038/s41598-025-08434-z.
17. McPherson S, Hardy T, Dufour JF, Petta S, Romero-Gomez M, Allison M. Age as a confounding factor for the accurate non-invasive diagnosis of advanced NAFLD fibrosis. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2017; 112(5): 740-751.
18. Feinstein AR, Cicchetti DV. High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes. J Clin Epidemiol. 1990; 43(6): 543-549.