3. Detection of EGFR mutations by gene sequencing technique from FFPE non-small cell lung cancer

Nguyen Van Duy, Tran Van Khanh

Main Article Content

Abstract

The application of molecular biomedical techniques in identifying mutations in EGFR gene has greatly facilitated targeted therapy for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Gene sequencing techniques and Realtime PCR are commonly used in Vietnam to develop targeted therapy, and both techniques have their own advantages and disadvantages and can be combined to complement each other. This study was conducted to 1) determine the rate of EGFR mutation by gene sequencing technique from FFPE NSCLC and 2) compare the results of EGFR mutations identified by gene sequencing and Realtime PCR. A total of 78 DNA samples were collected from NSCLC patients with EGFR gene mutations as identified by Real-time PCR. Sequencing technique was applied to identify EGFR gene mutations, and the result was compared to the results of Realtime PCR. Most samples (68/78, 87.18%) had similar mutations as those found by Realtime PCR. All 10 false negative samples had low percentages of cancer cells (≤ 35%). The false-negative rate of the sequenced samples in the study was 12.82%, mainly in the group with a low percentage of cancer cells (≤ 35%). The results suggest that, to find EGFR mutations for tissue samples with a high percentage of cancer cells, sequencing technique should be used, and for samples with low concentrations of cancer cells, Realtime PCR should be used.

Article Details

References

1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61(2):69-90. doi: 10.3322/caac.20107.
2. Nguyễn Minh Hà. Xác định đột biến gen EGFR và gen KRAS quyết định tính đáp ứng thuốc trong điều trị bệnh ung thư phổi không tế bào nhỏ. Trường Đại học Y Hà Nội; 2014.
3. Thai AA, Solomon BJ, Sequist LV, Gainor JF, Heist RS. Lung cancer. Lancet Lond Engl. 2021;398(10299):535-554. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00312-3.
4. Matsubara T, Nakajima E, Namikawa H, et al. Investigation of EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer usually undetectable by PCR methods. Mol Clin Oncol. 2022;16(1):15. doi: 10.3892/mco.2021.2447.
5. Kumar A, Petri ET, Halmos B, Boggon TJ. Structure and clinical relevance of the epidermal growth factor receptor in human cancer. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2008;26(10):1742-1751. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.1178.
6. Minh LK, Ngọc TV, Braeuer RR. Xác định đột biến EGFR ở bệnh nhân ung thư phổi không tế bào nhỏ. Published online 2016:8.
7. Khuất Hữu Thanh. Kỹ Thuật Gen - Nguyên Lý và Ứng Dụng. Nhà xuất bản Khoa học và Kỹ thuật; 2006.
8. Asano H, Toyooka S, Tokumo M, et al. Detection of EGFR gene mutation in lung cancer by mutant-enriched polymerase chain reaction assay. Clin Cancer Res Off J Am Assoc Cancer Res. 2006;12(1):43-48. doi: 10.1158/1078-043 2.CCR-05-0934.
9. Colling R, Bancroft H, Langman G, Soilleux E. Fully automated real-time PCR for EGFR testing in non-small cell lung carcinoma. Virchows Arch. 2019;474(2):187-192. doi: 10. 1007/s00428-018-2486-y.
10. Yukari Tsubata, Ryosuke Tanino, Takeshi Isobe. Current Therapeutic Strategies and Prospects for EGFR Mutation-Positive Lung Cancer Based on the Mechanisms Underlying Drug Resistance. Cells. 2021 Nov;10(11):3192. PMC. Accessed October 21, 2022. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8619018/.
11. Chan BA, Hughes BGM. Targeted therapy for non-small cell lung cancer: Current standards and the promise of the future. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2015;4(1):36-54. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2218-6751.2014.05.01.
12. Tạ Thành Văn. PCR và Một Số Kỹ Thuật y Sinh Học Phân Tử. Vol 122. Nhà xuất bản Y học; 2010.