Article Sidebar

PDF (Tiếng Việt)
Published: 2023-01-31
Abstract Views: 207
Views PDF (Tiếng Việt): 29
DOI: https://doi.org/10.52852/tcncyh.v162i1.1332
Issue
Vol. 162 No. 1 (2023)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Sỹ Quyền Năng, V. ., Trung Hiếu, P. ., Tú Nam, V., Trung Dũng, T. ., Thanh Tùng, P., & Đình Toàn, D. (2023). 16. Radiological results of total knee replacement using patient-specific ct-based instrument. Journal of Medical Research, 162(1), 138-146. https://doi.org/10.52852/tcncyh.v162i1.1332

16. Radiological results of total knee replacement using patient-specific ct-based instrument

Vo Sy Quyen Nang, Pham Trung Hieu, Vu Tu Nam, Tran Trung Dung, Phan Thanh Tung , Duong Dinh Toan

Main Article Content

Abstract

In total knee replacement surgery, the use of patient-specific instruments (PSI) were reported to improve the accuracy of artificial joint placement. This study reported the CT scan results of the PSI printed by our hospital's 3D printing lab. A total of 18 patients were included in the study. All patients underwent preoperative CT scan to develop surgical plan and postoperative CT scan for outcome evaluation. Mimics Medical (Materialise-Belgium) software was used to create a template for the sizing and position of cutting jigs, as well as the PSI design. The PSI were printed by 3D resin printers. Intraoperatively, after removing all remaining cartilage in the knee, the PSI would be implanted to the femur and tibial surfaces, and the pin position for manufacturer's instruments would be marked. The preparation of the PSI took approximately three days. All PSI matched their respective preoperative templates in size. The postoperative whole-leg axis was 1.2° ± 1.7°, and the rotation mismatch between the femur and tibial implant was 0.5° ± 1.6°.  Radiological results showed that using PSI improved the accuracy of placement, especially in controlling the rotational alignment.

Article Details

Keywords

Knee osteoarthritis, total knee replacement, patient specific instrument, 3D CT-scanner, 3D printing

References

1. Abdel MP, Oussedik S, Parratte S, Lustig S, Haddad FS. Coronal alignment in total knee replacement: historical review, contemporary analysis, and future direction. Bone Joint J. 2014; 96: 857–862.
2. Abdel MP, Ollivier M, Parratte S, Trousdale RT, Berry DJ, Pagnano MW. Effect of Postoperative Mechanical Axis Alignment on Survival and Functional Outcomes of Modern Total Knee Arthroplasties with Cement: A Concise Follow-up at 20 Years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Mar 21; 100(6): 472-478. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.01587. PMID: 29557863.
3. Zhou K, Ling T, Xu Y, Li J, Yu H, Wang H, Zhou Z, Pei F. Effect of individualized distal femoral valgus resection angle in primary total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis involving 1300 subjects. Int J Surg. 2018 Feb;50:87-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.12.028. Epub 2018 Jan 9. PMID: 29329788. doi:10.1016/j.knee.2005.07.001.
4. V. Kinzel, Scaddan M., Bradley B., Shakespeare D. Varus/valgus alignment of the femur in total knee arthroplasty. Can accuracy be improved by pre-operative CT scanning? Knee. Jun 2004; 11(3): 197-201. doi:10.1016/S0968-0160(03)00106-6.
5. M. Ettinger, Claassen L., Paes P., Calliess T. 2D versus 3D templating in total knee arthroplasty. Knee. Jan 2016; 23(1): 149-51. doi:10.1016/j.knee.2015.08.014
6. J. E. McGrory, Trousdale R. T., Pagnano M. W., Nigbur M. Preoperative hip to ankle radiographs in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. Nov 2002; (404): 196-202. doi:10.1097/00003086-200211000-00032
7. M. Pietsch, Hofmann S. [Value of radiographic examination of the knee joint for the orthopedic surgeon]. Radiologe. Jan 2006; 46(1): 55-64. Wertigkeit der radiologischen Bildgebung beim Kniegelenk fur den Orthopaden. doi:10.1007/s00117-005-1292-0.
8. S. W. Bell, Young P., Drury C., et al. Component rotational alignment in unexplained painful primary total knee arthroplasty. Knee. Jan 2014; 21(1): 272-7. doi:10.1016/j.knee.2012.09.011.
9. B. Boonen, Schotanus M. G., Kerens B., van der Weegen W., van Drumpt R. A., Kort N. P. Intra-operative results and radiological outcome of conventional and patient-specific surgery in total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. Oct 2013; 21(10): 2206-12. doi:10.1007/s00167-013-2620-y.
10. N. Yoshino, Takai S., Ohtsuki Y., Hirasawa Y. Computed tomography measurement of the surgical and clinical transepicondylar axis of the distal femur in osteoarthritic knees. J Arthroplasty. Jun 2001; 16(4): 493-7. doi:10.1054/arth.2001.23621.
11. Masao Akagi, Yamashita Eizaburo, Nakagawa Takehumi, Asano Taiyo, Nakamura Takashi. Relationship between frontal knee alignment and reference axes in the distal femur. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (1976-2007). 2001; 388: 147-156.
12. E. Thienpont, Schwab P. E., Paternostre F., Koch P. Rotational alignment of the distal femur: anthropometric measurements with CT-based patient-specific instruments planning show high variability of the posterior condylar angle. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. Dec 2014; 22(12): 2995-3002. doi:10.1007/s00167-014-3086-2.
13. A. Mannan, Smith T. O. Favourable rotational alignment outcomes in PSI knee arthroplasty: A Level 1 systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee. Mar 2016; 23(2): 186-90. doi:10.1016/j.knee.2015.08.006.
14. D. Nicoll, Rowley D. I. Internal rotational error of the tibial component is a major cause of pain after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. Sep 2010; 92(9): 1238-44. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.92B9.23516.
15. R. L. Barrack, Schrader T., Bertot A. J., Wolfe M. W., Myers L. Component rotation and anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. Nov 2001; (392): 46-55. doi:10.1097/00003086-200111000-00006.