Article Sidebar

PDF (Tiếng Việt)
Published: 2023-02-28
Abstract Views: 225
Views PDF (Tiếng Việt): 213
DOI: https://doi.org/10.52852/tcncyh.v163i2.1402
Issue
Vol. 163 No. 2 (2023)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Hùng, D. Đức, Nguyên, D. C., & Đạt, P. Q. (2023). 17. Aortic valve replacement in young adults: The Ross procedure is the optimal solution?. Journal of Medical Research, 163(2), 145-153. https://doi.org/10.52852/tcncyh.v163i2.1402

17. Aortic valve replacement in young adults: The Ross procedure is the optimal solution?

Duong Duc Hung, Duong Cong Nguyen, Pham Quoc Dat

Main Article Content

Abstract

The study aimed to understand the value of the Ross procedure in young adult patients with aortic valve replacement through a report of a serie of cases and literature review. The sample included 3 cases of the Ross procedure in young patients conducted at the Viet Nam National Heart Institute, Bach Mai Hospital. 1 case of severe aortic stenosis with complicated circulatory arrest and successful resuscitation, 2 cases of severe aortic regurgitation due to infective endocarditis. Autologous pulmonary valve was used to replace the aortic valve and homograft valve to replace the pulmonary valve for all patients. The average time of aortic clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass is 104.3 and 146.7 min, respectively. There were no postoperative complications. At 12 - 18 months of follow-up, the patients returned to normal life without the need of anticoagulation. The aortic valve and pulmonary valve homograft function well. We suggest that the Ross procedure may be a good solution for young patients who need an aortic valve replacement.

Article Details

Keywords

Ross procedure, homograft, aortic valve, young adults

References

1. David TE. Aortic valve repair and aortic valve-sparing operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015; 149(1): 9-11.
2. Sibilio S, Koziarz A, Belley-Côté EP, et al. Outcomes after Ross procedure in adult patients: A meta-analysis and microsimulation. J Card Surg. 2019; 34(5): 285-292.
3. Ross DN. Replacement of aortic and mitral valves with a pulmonary autograft. Lancet. 1967; 2(7523): 956-958.
4. Mastrobuoni S, de Kerchove L, Solari S, et al. The Ross procedure in young adults: over 20 years of experience in our Institution. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016; 49(2): 507-512; discussion 512-503.
5. Sievers HH, Stierle U, Charitos EI, et al. A multicentre evaluation of the autograft procedure for young patients undergoing aortic valve replacement: update on the German Ross Registry†. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016; 49(1): 212-218.
6. Otto CM, Nishimura RA, Bonow RO, et al. 2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2021; 143(5): e72-e227.
7. Mazine A, Rocha RV, El-Hamamsy I, et al. Ross Procedure vs Mechanical Aortic Valve Replacement in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Cardiol. 2018; 3(10): 978-987.
8. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Prosthesis-patient mismatch: definition, clinical impact, and prevention. Heart. 2006; 92(8): 1022-1029.
9. Bourguignon T, Bouquiaux-Stablo AL, Candolfi P, et al. Very long-term outcomes of the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount valve in aortic position. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015; 99(3): 831-837.
10. Korteland NM, Etnel JRG, Arabkhani B, et al. Mechanical aortic valve replacement in non-elderly adults: meta-analysis and microsimulation. Eur Heart J. 2017; 38(45): 3370-3377.
11. Simon-Kupilik N, Bialy J, Moidl R, et al. Dilatation of the autograft root after the Ross operation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002; 21(3): 470-473.
12. Hage A, Hage F, Valdis M, Guo L, Chu MWA. The Ross procedure is the optimal solution for young adults with unrepairable aortic valve disease. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2021; 10(4): 454-462.
13. Oeser C, Uyanik-Uenal K, Kocher A, Laufer G, Andreas M. Long-term performance of pulmonary homografts after the Ross procedure: experience up to 25 years. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019; 55(5): 876-884.
14. Chauvette V, Bouhout I, Lefebvre L, et al. The Ross procedure is a safe and durable option in adults with infective endocarditis: a multicentre study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020; 58(3): 537-543.
15. De Paulis R, Salica A. Surgical anatomy of the aortic valve and root-implications for valve repair. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2019; 8(3): 313-321.
16. Um KJ, McClure GR, Belley-Cote EP, et al. Hemodynamic outcomes of the Ross procedure versus other aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2018; 59(3): 462-470.
17. Nötzold A, Hüppe M, Schmidtke C, Blömer P, Uhlig T, Sievers HH. Quality of life in aortic valve replacement: pulmonary autografts versus mechanical prostheses. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 37(7): 1963-1966.