13. Reconstruction of hand injury due to venomous snakebites

Nguyen Quoc Manh, Tran Thiet Son, Pham Thi Viet Dung

Main Article Content

Abstract

To describe the local damages and evaluate the early results of plastic surgery for hand injuries caused by venomous snake bites. A cross-sectional descriptive study was performed on 30 patients diagnosed and treated for soft tissue hand injuries caused by venomous snakebite at the Department of Esthetic and Plastic of Bach Mai Hospital from January 2022 to December 2022. 60% of patients were bitten at the finger. 50% of all cases had hand tendons necrosisor bone necrosis of the fingers. There were 7 defects which were reconstructed by flaps or skin graft and 7 fingers were amputated primary; 7 defects were covered by skin grafts and 9 defects were reconstructed by local or free flap flaps at the secondary operation. Both skin grafts and 3 of 5 flaps created immediately at the primary surgery had bad results. All skin grafts and 7 of 9 flaps reconstructed during the secondary surgery gave good results. Clinical injuries caused by venomous snake bites on the hand are especially varied thus treatment and surgery must be selected accordingly to achieve good results The defects that were covered at the primary surgery gave poor results more often than when reconstructed at the secondary surgery after debridement and VAC.

Article Details

References

1. WHO/SEARO. Guidelines for the clinical management of snake bites in the Southeast Asian region. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1999;30 Suppl 1:1-85.
2. Lê Xuân Quý. Đặc điểm lâm sàng, vi khuẩn học của thương tổn tại chỗ và mô mềm do rắn hổ mang cắn. Luận văn thạc sỹ HSCC; 2018: 1-75.
3. Ince B, Gundeslioglu AO. The management of viper bites on the hand. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2014;39(6):642-646. doi: 10.1177/1753193413496943.
4. Grace TG, Omer GE. The management of upper extremity pit viper wounds. J Hand Surg Am. 1980;5(2):168-177. doi: 10.1016/s0363-5023(80)80149-3.
5. Russell JJ, Schoenbrunner A, Janis JE. Snake Bite Management: A Scoping Review of the Literature. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery – Global Open. 2021;9(4):e3506. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003506.
6. Nguyễn Kim Sơn. Rắn hổ cắn, cẩm nang cấp cứu. Nhà xuất bản Y học. 2000:403-406.
7. Zhang SX, Schmidt HM. Clinical anatomy of the subcutaneous veins in the dorsum of the hand. Ann Anat. 1993;175(4):381-384. doi: 10.1016/s0940-9602(11)80048-8.
8. Ruth En Si Tan. Vascular anatomy of the hand in relation to flaps. Hand clinics. 2020;1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2019.08.001.
9. Rha JH, Kwon SM, Oh JR, et al. Snakebite in Korea: A Guideline to Primary Surgical Management. Yonsei Med J. 2015;56(5):1443. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2015.56.5.1443.
10. Mao YC, Liu PY, Hung DZ, et al. Bacteriology of Naja atra Snakebite Wound and Its Implications for Antibiotic Therapy. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016;94(5):1129-1135. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.15-0667.