25. Review of covid-19 prevention ptrogram of district healthcare staff during 2021 and 2022
Main Article Content
Abstract
The study aims to assess the status of human resources, personal protective equipment, knowledge, training, mental health problems and prevalence of COVID-19 infection of district healthcare staffs who participated in COVID-19 prevention and control in some provinces in 2021 and 2022. This is a cross-sectional descriptive study. The study results show that, in 2021 with training, the correct use of personal protective equipment (PPE) accounts for 95.9%.. Essential protective equipment such as N95 masks, medical masks, protective gowns, medical gloves, face shields, hand sanitizers were readily available more than 90% in both 2021 and 2022. The anxiety rate of the study subjects gradually decreased through the times of participating in anti-epidemic from 2021 to 2022. In addition, 73.5% of the study population was infected with COVID-19, of which 58.5% were diagnosed during the fight against the epidemic, the rate of symptomatic infection was 92.9% and 33.3% was post-COVID-19 symptoms. The COVID-19 vaccine coverage rate is 92.0%.
Article Details
Keywords
Healthcare staffs, COVID-19, district level
References
2. Xuân LTT, Thảo NT, Anh NN, et al. Tính sẵn sàng ứng phó với COVID-19 của nhân viên y tế Việt Nam năm 2021. Tạp chí Nghiên cứu Y học. 10/06 2022; 157(9): 222-231. doi:10.52852/tcncyh.v157i9.1010.
3. Aggarwal N, Boppana TK, Mittal S. COVID-19 pandemic: The testing times for healthcare workers. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. Jan 21 2021; 91(1)doi: 10.4081/monaldi.2021.1515.
4. Gómez-Ochoa SA, Franco OH, Rojas LZ, et al. COVID-19 in Health-Care Workers: A Living Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prevalence, Risk Factors, Clinical Characteristics, and Outcomes. Am J Epidemiol. Jan 4 2021; 190(1): 161-175. doi:10.1093/aje/kwaa191.
5. Tulenko K. My COVID-19 dream: training enough health workers. Lancet Respir Med. Mar 2021; 9(3): e26. doi:10.1016/s2213-2600(21)00016-3.
6. Xuân LTT, Thảo NT, Quân PT, et al. Tác động của đại dịch Covid-19 tới nhân viên y tế tại Hà Nội năm 2020. Tạp chí Nghiên cứu Y học. 08/26 2021; 144(8): 1-8. doi:10.52852/tcncyh.v144i8.458.
7. Li Y, Liang M, Gao L, et al. Face masks to prevent transmission of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Infect Control. Jul 2021; 49(7): 900-906. doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2020.12.007.
8. Nguyen LH, Drew DA, Joshi AD, et al. Risk of COVID-19 among frontline healthcare workers and the general community: a prospective cohort study. medRxiv. May 25 2020; doi:10.1101/2020.04.29.20084111.
9. Saragih ID, Tonapa SI, Saragih IS, et al. Global prevalence of mental health problems among healthcare workers during the Covid-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. Sep 2021; 121: 104002. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.104002.
10. Lai J, Ma S, Wang Y, et al. Factors Associated With Mental Health Outcomes Among Health Care Workers Exposed to Coronavirus Disease 2019. JAMA Netw Open. Mar 2 2020; 3(3): e203976. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3976.
11. Bùi TT, Trần TL, Nguyễn KT, et al. Một số yếu tố liên quan tới trầm cảm của nhân viên bệnh viện trực tiếp chăm sóc người bệnh COVID-19. Tạp chí Nghiên cứu Y học. 10/30 2021; 145(9): 69-76. doi:10.52852/tcncyh.v145i9.265.
12. Thảo NT, Xuân LTT, Hoàng NH, et al. Tác động của đại dịch Covid-19 đến sức khỏe tâm thần của nhân viên y tế tại một số Bệnh viện tuyến Trung ương năm 2020. Tạp chí Nghiên cứu Y học. 08/26 2021; 144(8): 361-369. doi:10.52852/tcncyh.v144i8.459.
13. Song X, Fu W, Liu X, et al. Mental health status of medical staff in emergency departments during the Coronavirus disease 2019 epidemic in China. Brain Behav Immun. Aug 2020; 88:60-65. doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2020.06.002.
14. Zhang SX, Liu J, Afshar Jahanshahi A, et al. At the height of the storm: Healthcare staff’s health conditions and job satisfaction and their associated predictors during the epidemic peak of COVID-19. Brain Behav Immun. Jul 2020; 87:144-146. doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2020.05.010.