19. Initial assessment of the value of magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating limb-sparing surgery for primary long-bone cancer through cluster of cases

Truong Quynh Oanh, Dinh Trung Thanh, Luong Minh Tuan, Pham Hong Duc

Main Article Content

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the accuracy of MRI in detecting tumor margins during limb-sparing surgery for primary long malignant bone tumors in children. The study involved 15 patients (mean age of 11.53 ± 2.32 years), all diagnosed with primary long bone cancer through histopathology, who underwent MRI before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Osteosarcoma was found in 14 cases, while Ewing sarcoma was found in 1 case. The most frequent location of the tumor was around the knee joint (73.33%). The correlation coefficient between MRI and macroscopic MBH for evaluating tumor length was r = 0.941, p < 0.001. For soft tissue involvement, the combined use of STIR, T2W, and T1 post-gadolinium sequences had a sensitivity of 91.67% and a specificity of 66.67%. Meanwhile, for predicting invasion vascular, the sensitivity was 100% and the specificity was 92.31%; for invasion epiphyseal involvement, the sensitivity and the specificity were both 100%. Notably, no patient presented with joint invasion on MRI or histopathological examination in the study. These findings suggest that preoperative MRI is a valuable and reliable tool for accurately determining the boundaries of malignant bone tumors, which can be usefulin assessing long bone tumors before limb-sparing surgery.

Article Details

References

1. Lindsey BA, Markel JE, Kleinerman ES. Osteosarcoma Overview. Rheumatol Ther. 2016; 4(1): 25-43. doi:10.1007/s40744-016-0050-2.
2. Xu M, Wang Z, Yu X, Lin J, Hu Y. Guideline for Limb-Salvage Treatment of Osteosarcoma. Orthop Surg. 2020; 12(4): 1021-1029. doi:10.1111/os.12702.
3. Ahmad S, Stevenson J, Mangham C, Cribb G, Cool P. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in planning the osseous resection margins of bony tumours in the proximal femur: based on coronal T1-weighted versus STIR images. Skeletal Radiol. 2014; 43(12): 1679-1686. doi:10.1007/s00256-014-1979-2.
4. Putta T, Gibikote S, Madhuri V, Walter N. Accuracy of Various MRI Sequences in Determining the Tumour Margin in Musculoskeletal Tumours. Pol J Radiol. 2016; 81: 540-548. doi:10.12659/PJR.898108.
5. Thompson MJ, Shapton JC, Punt SE, Johnson CN, Conrad EU. MRI Identification of the Osseous Extent of Pediatric Bone Sarcomas. Clin Orthop. 2018; 476(3): 559-564. doi:10.1007/s11999.0000000000000068.
6. Jaffe N, Bruland OS, Bielack S, eds. Pediatric and Adolescent Osteosarcoma. 2010th edition. Springer; 2009.
7. Inarejos Clemente EJ, Navarro OM, Navallas M, et al. Multiparametric MRI evaluation of bone sarcomas in children. Insights Imaging. 2022; 13: 33. doi:10.1186/s13244-022-01177-9.
8. Jin Q, Xie X, Yao H, et al. Clinical Significance of the Radiological Relationship between the Tumor and the main blood vessels in Enneking IIB Osteosarcoma of the extremities. J Cancer. 2020; 11(11): 3235-3245. doi:10.7150/jca.42341.
9. jbstadmin. How important are surgical margins in Osteosarcoma? Journal of Bone & Soft Tissue Tumors. Published January 10, 2016. Accessed April 10, 2023. http://jbstjournal.com/important-surgical-margins-osteosarcoma/.
10. Gulia A, Puri A, Subi TS, Gupta SM, Juvekar SL, Rekhi B. Comparison of MRI and Histopathology with regard to Intramedullary Extent of Disease in Bone Sarcomas. Sarcoma. 2019; 2019: e7385470. doi:10.1155/2019/7385470.
11. Jin T, Deng ZP, Liu WF, Xu HR, Li Y, Niu XH. Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Assessment of Long Bone Tumors. Chin Med J (Engl). 2017; 130(21): 2547-2550. doi:10.4103/0366-6999.217087.
12. Holzapfel K, Regler J, Baum T, et al. Local Staging of Soft-Tissue Sarcoma: Emphasis on Assessment of Neurovascular Encasement-Value of MR Imaging in 174 Confirmed Cases. Radiology. 2015; 275(2): 501-509. doi:10.1148/radiol.14140510.
13. White LM, Wunder JS, Bell RS, et al. Histologic assessment of peritumoral edema in soft tissue sarcoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005; 61(5): 1439-1445. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.08.036.