Article Sidebar

PDF (Tiếng Việt)
Published: 2023-08-22
Abstract Views: 226
Views PDF (Tiếng Việt): 100
DOI: https://doi.org/10.52852/tcncyh.v168i7.1761
Issue
Vol. 168 No. 7 (2023)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Mỹ, P. T. ., Hùng, H. S. ., Hiền, L. T. T. ., Trang, N. T. H. ., & Hạnh, P. T. M. . (2023). 15. Clinical outcomes of modified natural cycle versus hormone replacement therapy for endometrial preparation for frozen embryo transfer. Journal of Medical Research, 168(7), 134-142. https://doi.org/10.52852/tcncyh.v168i7.1761

15. Clinical outcomes of modified natural cycle versus hormone replacement therapy for endometrial preparation for frozen embryo transfer

Pham Thi My, Ho Sy Hung, Le Thi Thu Hien, Nguyen Thi Huyen Trang, Pham Thi My Hanh

Main Article Content

Abstract

A single-center randomized clinical trial was conducted on 167 patients frozen embryo transfer in the period between August 2022 and March 2023 in the Andrology and Fertility Hospital of Hanoi. The results showed that the mean age in mNC and HRT groups was 31 ± 5 and 30 ± 5 years, respectively. The endometrial thickness on the day of Progesterone administration in the mNC group and the HRT group were 10.99 ± 1.46 and 10.70 ± 1.06mm, respectively. There was no significant difference between 2 groups regarding implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and ongoing pregnancy rate. After adjusting for age, boday mass index, duration of infertility, type of infertility, history of miscarriage, number of failed embryo transfers, and endometrial thickness on the day of Progesterone administration, the number of good-quality embryos transferred showed that the clinical pregnancy rate in the HRT was trend higher than that mNC, but the relationship was not statistically significant with p > 0.05. The selection of a regimen to use for endometrial preparation for frozen embryo transfer depends on individualized patient treatment and each center.

Article Details

Keywords

Modified Natural Cycle, Hormone replacement treatment (HRT), Frozen Embryo Transfer

References

1. Nguyễn Viết Tiến, Ngô Văn Toàn, Ngô Thị Ngọc Phụng. Dịch tễ học vô sinh và các phương pháp điều trị. Nhà xuất bản Y học 2012.
2. Polyzos NP, Drakopoulos P, Parra J, et al. Cumulative live birth rates according to the number of oocytes retrieved after the first ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: A multicenter multinational analysis including ~ 15,000 women. Fertility sterility. 2018;110(4):661-670. e661.
3. Wei D, Legro RS, Chen Z-J. The cumulative live birth rate after a freeze-only strategy versus a conventional fresh embryo transfer strategy: A call for more level 1 evidence. BMC medicine. 2020;18:1-3.
4. Mumusoglu S, Polat M, Ozbek IY, et al. Preparation of the endometrium for frozen embryo transfer: A systematic review. Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2021:831.
5. Glujovsky D, Pesce R, Sueldo C, et al. Endometrial preparation for women undergoing embryo transfer with frozen embryos or embryos derived from donor oocytes. Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2020(10).
6. Fu Y, Shen X, Zhou C. 8. Comparison of natural cycles versus hormone replacement treatment for 2398 frozen - thawed embryo transfer cycles for preimplantation genetic testing patients. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 2019;39:e31.
7. Givens CR, Markun LC, Ryan IP, et al. Outcomes of natural cycles versus programmed cycles for 1677 frozen–thawed embryo transfers. Reproductive biomedicine online. 2009;19(3):380-384.
8. Liu X, Shi W, Shi J. Natural cycle frozen-thawed embryo transfer in young women with regular menstrual cycles increases the live-birth rates compared with hormone replacement treatment: A retrospective cohort study. Fertility sterility 2020;113(4):811-817.
9. Kawamura T, Motoyama H, Yanaihara A, et al. Clinical outcomes of two different endometrial preparation methods for cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfer in patients with a normal menstrual cycle. Reproductive medicine Biology. 2007;6:53-57.
10. Kim YJ, Choi YS, Lee WD, et al. Does a vitrified blastocyst stage embryo transfer program need hormonal priming for endometrial preparation? Journal of Obstetrics Gynaecology Research. 2010;36(4):783-788.
11. Cardenas Armas DF, Peñarrubia J, Goday A, et al. Frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer in natural cycle increase implantation rates compared artificial cycle. Gynecological Endocrinology. 2019;35(10):873-877.
12. Morozov V, Ruman J, Kenigsberg D, et al. Natural cycle cryo-thaw transfer may improve pregnancy outcome. Journal of Assisted Reproduction Genetics. 2007;24:119-123.
13. Orvieto R, Feldman N, Lantsberg D, et al. Natural cycle frozen-thawed embryo transfer - can we improve cycle outcome? Journal of assisted reproduction genetics. 2016;33:611-615.
14. Patel S, Kilburn B, Imudia A, et al. Estradiol elicits proapoptotic and antiproliferative effects in human trophoblast cells. Biology of reproduction. 2015;93(3):74, 71-10.
15. Saito K, Kuwahara A, Ishikawa T, et al. Endometrial preparation methods for frozen-thawed embryo transfer are associated with altered risks of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, placenta accreta, and gestational diabetes mellitus. Human Reproduction. 2019;34(8):1567-1575.