39. Pilonidal sinus surgery by means of asymmetric cleft lift technique: A case series and literature review

Tran Que Son, Tran Hieu Hoc

Main Article Content

Abstract

To date, there is no consensus on the optimal surgical method for pilonidal sinus disease (PSD), and up to half of patients struggle with recurrence. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the results after introducing the Bascom asymmetric cleft lift procedure in our hospital and review the current literature on techniques of pilonidal sinus surgery. We retrospectively described the cases being operated from Jan 2021 to Aug 2023 at the Department of General Surgery, Bach Mai Hospital. We evaluated short-term results within 30 days after surgery by clinical examination and ultrasound. As a result, there were a total of 4 patients, including three males and one female, aged from 16 to 67 years old. All patients had surgery for the first time with 100% type III (Tezel classification). Operation time, hospital stay and drainage of the surgical area was range from 32 to 40 minutes; from 4 to 7 days, from 4 to 15 days. Wound healing times were 15, 22, 17, and 25 days, respectively. One case of bleeding after surgery did not require re-operation. No recurrence has been reported. Conclusion: asymmetric cleft lift procedure is feasible, easy to perform with short surgery time; wound healing time is about 3 weeks. This technique also has complications of deep infection, partial dehiscence, and recurrence. Therefore, re-examination plan is needed to have appropriate treatment methods.

Article Details

References

1. Bali I, Aziret M, Sozen S, et al. Effectiveness of Limberg and Karydakis flap in recurrent pilonidal sinus disease. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2015; 70(5): 350-355.
2. Bascom J, Bascom T. Failed pilonidal surgery: new paradigm and new operation leading to cures. Arch Surg. 2002; 137(10): 1146-1150; discussion 1151.
3. Rushfeldt C, Bernstein A, Norderval S, Revhaug A. Introducing an asymmetric cleft lift technique as a uniform procedure for pilonidal sinus surgery. Scand J Surg. 2008; 97(1): 77-81.
4. Guner A, Ozkan OF, Kece C, Kesici S, Kucuktulu U. Modification of the Bascom cleft lift procedure for chronic pilonidal sinus: results in 141 patients. Colorectal Dis. 2013; 15(7): e402-406.
5. Favuzza J, Brand M, Francescatti A, Orkin B. Cleft lift procedure for pilonidal disease: technique and perioperative management. Tech Coloproctol. 2015; 19(8): 477-482.
6. Alvandipour M, Zamani MS, Ghorbani M, Charati JY, Karami MY. Comparison of Limberg Flap and Karydakis Flap Surgery for the Treatment of Patients With Pilonidal Sinus Disease: A Single-Blinded Parallel Randomized Study. Ann Coloproctol. 2019; 35(6): 313-318.
7. Wickramasekera N, Strong E, Shackley P, et al. Patient preferences for pilonidal sinus treatments: a discrete choice experiment survey. Colorectal Dis. 2023.
8. Segre D, Pozzo M, Perinotti R, Roche B, Italian Society of Colorectal S. The treatment of pilonidal disease: guidelines of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR). Tech Coloproctol. 2015; 19(10): 607-613.
9. Odlo M, Horn J, Xanthoulis A. Surgery for pilonidal sinus disease in Norway: training, attitudes and preferences-a survey among Norwegian surgeons. BMC Surg. 2022; 22(1): 442.
10. Amorim M, Estevao-Costa J, Santos C, Fernandes S, Fragoso AC. Minimally invasive surgery for pilonidal disease: Outcomes of the Gips technique-A systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgery. 2023; 174(3): 480-486.
11. Phạm Phúc Khánh, Phạm Thị Thanh Huyền, Nguyễn Đắc Thao và cộng sự. Phẫu thuật nội soi điều trị bệnh viêm rò xoang lông vùng cùng cụt. Tap chí Y dược lâm sàng 108. 2020; 15(2): 95 - 99.
12. Alkurt EG, Vardar YM, Tuzun IS. Comparison of Limberg Flap and Karydakis Flap Repair in Pilonidal Sinus Surgery: A Prospective Case-Control Study. Cureus. 2022; 14(9):e28933.
13. Ortega PM, Baixauli J, Arredondo J, et al. Is the cleft lift procedure for non-acute sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease a definitive treatment? Long-term outcomes in 74 patients. Surg Today. 2014; 44(12): 2318-2323.
14. Umesh V, Sussman RH, Smith J, Whyte C. Long term outcome of the Bascom cleft lift procedure for adolescent pilonidal sinus. J Pediatr Surg. 2018; 53(2): 295-297.
15. Svarre KJ, Serup CM, Kanstrup CTB, Kleif J, Bertelsen CA. Long-term outcome after Bascom’s cleft-lift procedure under tumescent local analgesia for pilonidal sinus disease: a cohort study. Colorectal Dis. 2023; 25(4): 707-716.
16. Tezel E. A new classification according to navicular area concept for sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease. Colorectal Dis. 2007; 9(6): 575-576.
17. Vartanian E, Gould DJ, Lee SW, Patel KM. Pilonidal Disease: Classic and Contemporary Concepts for Surgical Management. Ann Plast Surg. 2018; 81(6): e12-e19.
18. Tezel E, Bostanci H, Anadol AZ, Kurukahvecioglu O. Cleft lift procedure for sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009; 52(1): 135-139.
19. Karydakis GE. Easy and successful treatment of pilonidal sinus after explanation of its causative process. Aust N Z J Surg. 1992; 62(5): 385-389.
20. Guner A, Boz A, Ozkan OF, Ileli O, Kece C, Reis E. Limberg flap versus Bascom cleft lift techniques for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus: prospective, randomized trial. World J Surg. 2013; 37(9): 2074-2080.
21. Nordon IM, Senapati A, Cripps NP. A prospective randomized controlled trial of simple Bascom’s technique versus Bascom’s cleft closure for the treatment of chronic pilonidal disease. Am J Surg. 2009; 197(2): 189-192.