Article Sidebar

PDF (Tiếng Việt)
Published: 2024-05-23
Abstract Views: 382
Views PDF (Tiếng Việt): 234
DOI: https://doi.org/10.52852/tcncyh.v176i3.2275
Issue
Vol. 176 No. 3 (2024)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Công, M. T. ., Minh, T. B. ., Thảo, P. T. ., Oanh, T. T. ., Liên, N. T. T. ., Đếm, P. V. ., & Nam, N. T. . (2024). 2. The sensitivity of the EULAR/ACR 2019, SLICC 2012 and ACR 1997 classification criteria for pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus. Journal of Medical Research, 176(3), 8-15. https://doi.org/10.52852/tcncyh.v176i3.2275

2. The sensitivity of the EULAR/ACR 2019, SLICC 2012 and ACR 1997 classification criteria for pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus

Mai Thanh Cong, Trinh Binh Minh, Pham Thi Thao, Tran Thi Oanh, Nguyen Thi Thuy Lien, Pham Van Dem, Nguyen Thanh Nam

Main Article Content

Abstract

A cross-sectional study was conducted on 83 pediatric patients diagnosed with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) at the Pediatric Center of Bach Mai Hospital from January 2021 to December 2023 to compare the sensitivity of the EULAR/ACR 2019, SLICC 2012, and ACR 1997 classification criteria and various related factors in diagnosing pediatric SLE. The sensitivity of the EULAR/ACR 2019, SLICC 2012, and ACR 1997 classification criteria in diagnosing lupus in the study group were 100%, 95.2%, and 65.1% respectively. The sensitivity of the ACR 1997 classification criteria in patients with ≥ 2 clinical manifestations (75.7%), hematological manifestations (78.9%), mucocutaneous manifestations (90.2%), serositis (94.4%), and renal involvement (83.0%) was higher compared to those with only 1 clinical manifestation (7.7%), no hematological abnormalities (53.3%), no mucocutaneous manifestations (40.5%), no serositis (56.9%) and no renal involvement (33.3%). The differences were statistically significant, p < 0.05.

Article Details

Keywords

Lupus, EULAR/ACR 2019, SLICC 2012, ACR 1997, sensitivity, pediatric

References

1. George C. Tsokos. Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. NEJM. 2011;365:2110-2121. Accessed February 17, 2024. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMra1100359
2. Rahman A, Isenberg DA. Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(9):929-939. doi:10.1056/NEJMra071297
3. Tan EM, Cohen AS, Fries JF, et al. The 1982 revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 1982;25(11):1271-1277. doi:10.1002/a rt.1780251101
4. Batu ED, Akca UK, Kısaarslan AP, et al. The Performances of the ACR 1997, SLICC 2012, and EULAR/ACR 2019 Classification Criteria in Pediatric Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. J Rheumatol. 2021;48(6):907-914. doi:10.3899/jrheum.200871
5. Aringer M, Leuchten N, Johnson SR. New Criteria for Lupus. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2020;22(6). doi:10.1007/s11926-020-00896-6
6. Reem Abdwani, Eman Al Masroori, Eiman Abdullah, et al. Evaluating the performance of ACR, SLICC and EULAR/ACR classification criteria in childhood onset systemic lupus erythematosus. Pediatric Rheumatology. 2021; 141(19).
7. Martin Aringer, Karen H Costenbader, David I Daikh, et al. 2019 EULAR/ACR Classification Criteria for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71(9):1400-1412.
8. Linjia Jia, Alana B Levine, Michael D Lockshin. American College of Rheumatology Criteria for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Exclude Half of All Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017;69(7):1502-1503. doi:10.1002/art.40120
9. Michelle Petri, Ana-Maria Orbai, Graciela S Alarcón, et al. Derivation and Validation of Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics Classification Criteria for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2012; 64(8):2677-2686. doi: 10.1002/art.34473
10. Rodrigues Fonseca A, Felix Rodrigues MC, Sztajnbok FR, et al. Comparison among ACR1997, SLICC and the new EULAR/ACR classification criteria in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus. Adv Rheumatol. 2019;59(1):20. doi:10.1186/s42358-019-0062-z
11. Fonseca AR, Gaspar-Elsas MIC, Land MGP, et al. Comparison between three systems of classification criteria in juvenile systemic lupus erythematous. Rheumatology. 2015;54(2):241-247. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keu278
12. Hartman EAR, van Royen-Kerkhof A, Jacobs JWG, et al. Performance of the 2012 Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics classification criteria versus the 1997 American College of Rheumatology classification criteria in adult and juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Autoimmun Rev. 2018;17(3):316-322. doi:10.1016/j.autrev.2018.01.007
13. Levinsky Y, Broide M, Kagan S, et al. Performance of 2019 EULAR/ACR classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus in a paediatric population - a multicentre study. Rheumatology. 2021;60(11):5142-5148. doi:10. 1093/rheumatology/keab140
14. Smith EMD, Rasul S, Ciurtin C, et al. Limited sensitivity and specificity of the ACR/EULAR-2019 classification criteria for SLE in JSLE? - observations from the UK JSLE Cohort Study. Rheumatology. 2021;60(11):5271-5281. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keab210
15. Lu W, Zhong Y, Weng C, et al. Utility of the ACR-1997, SLICC-2012 and EULAR/ACR-2019 classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus: a single-centre retrospective study. Lupus Sci Med. 2022;9(1):e000718. doi:10.1136/lupus-2022-000718