Article Sidebar

PDF (Tiếng Việt)
Published: 2024-07-31
Abstract Views: 158
Views PDF (Tiếng Việt): 114
DOI: https://doi.org/10.52852/tcncyh.v179i6.2440
Issue
Vol. 179 No. 6 (2024)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Anh, N. V., Trang, N. T. N., Hoàng, N. Đức, Ngọc, V. T. N., & Sơn, T. M. (2024). 1. Bond strength and post-bonding outcomes of zirconia and lithium disilicate laminate veneers. Journal of Medical Research, 179(6), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.52852/tcncyh.v179i6.2440

1. Bond strength and post-bonding outcomes of zirconia and lithium disilicate laminate veneers

Nguyen Viet Anh, Nguyen Thi Nhu Trang, Nguyen Duc Hoang, Vo Truong Nhu Ngoc, Tong Minh Son

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aimed to compare zirconia and lithium disilicate bonding strength to resin veneer cement in-vitro. Furthermore, clinical post-bonding outcomes of zirconia and lithium disilicate laminate veneers were also compared. The clinical study included 26 patients who have tooth rehabilitation with laminate veneers at the School of Dentistry. The shear bond strength of zirconia to veneer cement was significantly higher than that of lithium disilicate (p < 0.001). There were no statistically significant difference in marginal and internal gaps between zirconia and lithium disilicate laminate veneers. The United States Public Health Standard prosthetic rating also showed no significant difference between the two groups two weeks post-bonding. The shear bond strength of zirconia to veneer cement is higher than lithium disilicate in the in-vitro condition. Clinical post-bonding outcomes of zirconia veneers were comparable with lithium disilicate laminate veneers. This was a limited study therefore we suggest further studies with larger samples size and longer follow-up periods should be conducted.

Article Details

Keywords

Ceramic laminate veneer, zirconia, lithium disilicate, fixed prosthetics, minimally invasive dentistry

References

1. Beier US, Kapferer I, Burtscher D, Dumfahrt H. Clinical performance of porcelain laminate veneers for up to 20 years. Int J Prosthodont. 2012; 25(1): 79 - 85.
2. Rinke S, Bettenhäuser-Hartung L, Leha A, Rödiger M, Schmalz G, Ziebolz D. Retrospective evaluation of extended glass-ceramic ceramic laminate veneers after a mean observational period of 10 years. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 2020; 32(5): 487 - 495.
3. Ballis S, Kahng L. Minimally invasive makeover: platinum foil technique. Dentistry Today. 2010; 29(2): 146, 148-9.
4. Guachetá L, Stevens CD, Tamayo Cardona JA, Murgueitio R. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate veneers fabricated via a manual waxing technique versus a 3D printed technique. The Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 2022; 34(4): 715-720.
5. Souza R, Barbosa F, Araújo G, Miyashita E, Bottino MA, Melo R, et al. Ultrathin Monolithic Zirconia Veneers: Reality or Future? Report of a Clinical Case and One-year Follow-up. Operative Dentistry. 2018; 43(1): 3-11.
6. Quigley NP, Loo DSS, Choy C, Ha WN. Clinical efficacy of methods for bonding to zirconia: A systematic review. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2021; 125(2): 231-240.
7. Gakis P, Kontogiorgos E, Zeller S, Nagy WW. Effect of firing and fabrication technique on the marginal fit of heat-pressed lithium disilicate veneers. J Prosthet Dent. 2022; 127(1): 154-160.
8. Mikeli A, Walter MH, Rau SA, Raedel M, Raedel M. Three-year clinical performance of posterior monolithic zirconia single crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 2022; 128(6): 1252-1257.
9. Riesgo BVP, Rodrigues CdS, Nascimento LPd, May LG. Effect of hydrofluoric acid concentration and etching time on the adhesive and mechanical behavior of glass-ceramics: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2023; 121(1): 103303.
10. Her SB, Kim KH, Park SE, Park EJ. The effect of zirconia surface architecturing technique on the zirconia/veneer interfacial bond strength. J Adv Prosthodont. 2018; 10(4): 259-264.
11. Cho JH, Kim SJ, Shim JS, Lee KW. Effect of zirconia surface treatment using nitric acid-hydrofluoric acid on the shear bond strengths of resin cements. J Adv Prosthodont. 2017; 9(2): 77-84.
12. Kansal R, Rani S, Kumar M, Kumar S, Issar G. Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Newer Resin Cement (RelyX Ultimate and RelyX U200) to Lithium Disilicate and Zirconia Ceramics as Influenced by Thermocycling. Contemp Clin Dent. 2018; 9(4): 601-606.
13. Riccitiello F, Amato M, Leone R, Spagnuolo G, Sorrentino R. In vitro Evaluation of the Marginal Fit and Internal Adaptation of Zirconia and Lithium Disilicate Single Crowns: Micro-CT Comparison Between Different Manufacturing Procedures. Open Dent J. 2018; 12(1): 160-172.
14. Turkyilmaz I, Benli M, Yun S. Evaluation of marginal and internal fit of lithium disilicate and zirconia all-ceramic CAD-CAM crowns using digital impressions: A systematic review. Prim Dent J. 2023; 12(1): 88-95.
15. Fawakhiri HA, Abboud S, Kanout S. A 3-year controlled clinical trial comparing high-translucency zirconia (cubic zirconia) with lithium disilicate glass ceramic (e.max). Clin Exp Dent Res. 2023; 9(6): 1078-1088.