Article Sidebar

PDF (Tiếng Việt)
Published: 2024-07-31
Abstract Views: 93
Views PDF (Tiếng Việt): 53
DOI: https://doi.org/10.52852/tcncyh.v179i6.2481
Issue
Vol. 179 No. 6 (2024)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Giang, N. T. T., Văn, P. T., Anh, N. Đức, & Anh, B. T. V. (2024). 12. Preliminary outcomes of needle revision on failed deep slerectomy blebs. Journal of Medical Research, 179(6), 108-116. https://doi.org/10.52852/tcncyh.v179i6.2481

12. Preliminary outcomes of needle revision on failed deep slerectomy blebs

Nguyen Thi Thuy Giang, Pham Trong Van, Nguyen Duc Anh, Bui Thi Van Anh

Main Article Content

Abstract

A likely filtering bleb from a deep sclerectomy may fail due to post-operative scar formation. Currently, needle revision is a minimally invasive intervention used to salvage the function of a failed deep sclerectomy bleb. This study included 28 failed deep sclerectomy eyes from 23 patients at the Vietnam National Eye Hospital. The mean intraocular pressure (IOP) decreased significantly from a baseline mean of 26.14 ± 5.41mmHg to 14.46 ± 3.47mmHg at 1 month, 14.46 ± 4.81mmHg at 2 months, 14.00 ± 4.81mmHg at 3 months, and 14.78 ± 3.33mmHg at 6 months. The complete success rates were 85.71% and 78.57% at 3 months and 6 months after needle revision, respectively. Complications included subconjunctival hemorrhage in 14 eyes (50%), iris incarceration in 2 eyes (7.2%), and keratitis in 2 eyes (7.2%). In conclusion, needle revision is a simple and effective technique with the potential for widespread application in eye centers.

Article Details

Keywords

Needle revision, deep sclerectomy

References

1. Krasnov MM. Externalization of Schlemm’s canal (sinusotomy) in glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 1968; 52(2): 157-161.
2. Correia Barbosa R, Gonçalves R, Bastos R, et al. Trabeculectomy Vs Non-penetrating Deep Sclerectomy for the Surgical Treatment of Open-Angle Glaucoma: A Long-Term Report of 201 Eyes. Clin Ophthalmol. 2023; 17: 1619-1627. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S405837
3. Bissig A, Rivier D, Zaninetti M, Shaarawy T, Mermoud A, Roy S. Ten years follow-up after deep sclerectomy with collagen implant. J Glaucoma. 2008; 17(8): 680-686. doi:10.1097/IJG.0b013e318182ed9e.
4. Anand N, Kumar A, Gupta A. Primary phakic deep sclerectomy augmented with mitomycin C: long-term outcomes. J Glaucoma. 2011; 20(1): 21-27. doi:10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181ccb926.
5. Shetty RK, Wartluft L, Moster MR. Slit-lamp needle revision of failed filtering blebs using high-dose mitomycin C. J Glaucoma. 2005;14(1): 52-56. doi:10.1097/01.ijg.0000146364.90506.7c.
6. Anand N, Khan A. Long-term outcomes of needle revision of trabeculectomy blebs with mitomycin C and 5-fluorouracil: a comparative safety and efficacy report. J Glaucoma. 2009;18(7):513-520. doi:10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181911271
7. Broadway DC, Bloom PA, Bunce C, Thiagarajan M, Khaw PT. Needle revision of failing and failed trabeculectomy blebs with adjunctive 5-fluorouracil: survival analysis. Ophthalmology. 2004; 111(4): 665-673. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2003.07.009.
8. Koukkoulli A, Musa F, Anand N. Long-term outcomes of needle revision of failing deep sclerectomy blebs. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2015; 253(1): 99-106. doi:10.1007/s00417-014-2810-4.
9. Baxant AD, Klimešová YM, Holubová L, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Deep Sclerectomy With the Esnoper Clip Implant for Uncontrolled Primary Open Angle Glaucoma: A 1 Year Prospective Study. J Glaucoma. 2023; 32(3): 227-235. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000002137.
10. Gutiérrez-Ortiz C, Moreno-Salgueiro A, Rodrigo-Rey S, González-Mesa A, Pérez-Rico C. Prospective Evaluation of the First Mitomycin C Augmented Needle Revision in Patients With Failed Nonpenetrating Deep Sclerectomy. J Glaucoma. 2021; 30(4): e175-e179. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000001789.