19. Lymph node metastasis status and immunohistochemistry characteristics of invasive micropapillary breast cancer patients undergoing surgery at K Hospital

Pham Hong Khoa, Tran Nguyen Tuan

Main Article Content

Abstract

The study evaluates the status of axillary lymph node metastasis and immunohistochemical characteristics of 62 patients with invasive micropapillary breast cancer who underwent surgery at K Hospital from January 2018 to December 2023. The average age was 50.1 years. Most patients had BIRADS 4C or BIRADS 5 on breast ultrasound (37.1% and 46.8%, respectively). The rate of axillary lymph node metastasis was 72.6%, with stages N1, N2, and N3 being 40.3%, 22.6%, and 9.7%, respectively. The rates of ER-positive, PR-positive, and HER2/neu (+++) patients were 87.1%, 74.2%, and 29%, respectively. Patients with lymphovascular invasion accounted for a high proportion at 56.5%. Factors related to axillary lymph node metastasis included tumor size, lymphovascular invasion, and the micropapillary component of the tumor. However, there was no difference in the rate of axillary lymph node metastasis among pathologic subtypes. Invasive micropapillary breast cancer exhibits characteristics of high malignancy, with early axillary lymph node metastasis and a high rate of positive hormone receptor and low rate of HER2/neu overexpression.

Article Details

References

1. Yun SU, Choi BB, Shu KS, et al. Imaging findings of invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast. J Breast Cancer. 2012;15(1):57-64. doi:10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.57
2. Böcker W. WHO classification of breast tumors and tumors of the female genital organs: pathology and genetics. Verh Dtsch Ges Pathol. 2002;86:116-119.
3. Yang YL, Liu BB, Zhang X, et al. Invasive Micropapillary Carcinoma of the Breast: An Update. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2016;140(8):799-805. doi:10.5858/arpa.2016-0040-RA
4. Zekioglu O, Erhan Y, Ciris M, et al. Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast: high incidence of lymph node metastasis with extranodal extension and its immunohistochemical profile compared with invasive ductal carcinoma. Histopathology. 2004;44(1):18-23. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2559.2004.01757.x
5. Hashmi AA, Aijaz S, Mahboob R, et al. Clinicopathologic features of invasive metaplastic and micropapillary breast carcinoma: comparison with invasive ductal carcinoma of breast. BMC Res Notes. 2018;11:531. doi:10.1186/s13104-018-3623-z
6. Wang S, Zhang Y, Yin F, et al. Survival Outcomes After Breast-Conserving Therapy Compared With Mastectomy for Patients With Early-Stage Invasive Micropapillary Carcinoma of the Breast: A SEER Population-Based Study. Front Oncol. 2021;11. doi:10.3389/fonc.2021.741737
7. Gokce H, Durak MG, Akin MM, et al. Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast: a clinicopathologic study of 103 cases of an unusual and highly aggressive variant of breast carcinoma. Breast J. 2013;19(4):374-381. doi:10.1111/tbj.12128
8. Chen L, Fan Y, Lang R gang, et al. Breast Carcinoma With Micropapillary Features: Clinicopathologic Study and Long-Term Follow-Up of 100 Cases. Int J Surg Pathol. 2008;16(2):155-163. doi:10.1177/1066896907307047
9. Cui ZQ, Feng JH, Zhao YJ. Clinicopathological features of invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast. Oncol Lett. 2015;9(3):1163-1166. doi:10.3892/ol.2014.2806
10. Jones KN, Guimaraes LS, Reynolds CA, et al. Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast: imaging features with clinical and pathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;200(3):689-695. doi:10.2214/AJR.12.8512
11. Adrada B, Arribas E, Gilcrease M, et al. Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast: mammographic, sonographic, and MRI features. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193(1):W58-63. doi:10.2214/AJR.08.1537
12. Shi WB, Yang LJ, Hu X, et al. Clinico-Pathological Features and Prognosis of Invasive Micropapillary Carcinoma Compared to Invasive Ductal Carcinoma: A Population-Based Study from China. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(6):e101390. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0101390
13. Chen AC, Paulino AC, Schwartz MR, et al. Population-based comparison of prognostic factors in invasive micropapillary and invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast. Br J Cancer. 2014;111(3):619-622. doi:10.1038/bjc.2014.301
14. Yoon GY, Cha JH, Kim HH, et al. Comparison of invasive micropapillary and invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast: a matched cohort study. Acta Radiol Stockh Swed 1987. 2019;60(11):1405-1413. doi:10.1177/0284185119834689
15. Tang S li, Yang J qiao, Du Z gui, et al. Clinicopathologic study of invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast. Oncotarget. 2017;8(26):42455-42465. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.16405
16. Ye FG, Xia C, Ma D, et al. Nomogram for predicting preoperative lymph node involvement in patients with invasive micropapillary carcinoma of breast: a SEER population-based study. BMC Cancer. 2018;18:1085. doi:10.1186/s12885-018-4982-5
17. Wang R, Li N, Wang XJ, et al. Differences in the clinicopathological characteristics of pure and mixed invasive micropapillary breast carcinomas from eastern China. Ann Transl Med. 2021;9(5):412. doi:10.21037/atm-20-8045
18. Lewis GD, Xing Y, Haque W, et al. The impact of molecular status on survival outcomes for invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast. Breast J. 2019;25(6):1171-1176. doi:10.1111/tbj.13432