Article Sidebar

PDF (Tiếng Việt)
Published: 2024-12-24
Abstract Views: 0
Views PDF (Tiếng Việt): 0
DOI: https://doi.org/10.52852/tcncyh.v185i12.2803
Issue
Vol. 185 No. 12 (2024)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Dung, Đỗ T., & Tuệ, N. T. (2024). Evaluation of quality indicators in the pre-analytical at Hanoi Medical University Hospital. Journal of Medical Research, 185(12), 9-15. https://doi.org/10.52852/tcncyh.v185i12.2803

Evaluation of quality indicators in the pre-analytical at Hanoi Medical University Hospital

Do Thuy Dung, Nguyen Trong Tue

Main Article Content

Abstract

The quality indicators (QIs) for the pre-analytical phase based on IFCC and WGLEPS standards include 16 indicators. Our study was conducted by analyzing these 16 indicators at the Laboratory Department of Hanoi Medical University Hospital from July 2023 to December 2023. Out of a total of 299,720 test samples, 631 samples had errors, accounting for 0.21%. The most common error was hemolyzed samples (QI-10) with 403 samples, accounting for 0.13%. Other errors, such as insufficient sample volume (QI-12) and inappropriate sample-anticoagulant ratio (QI-13), each accounted for 0.04%. The results show that the error rate in the pre-analytical phase at this hospital is lower compared to many other studies. The study concludes that error control in the pre-analytical phase at Hanoi Medical University Hospital is quite effective, contributing to ensuring the quality of tests and the reliability of diagnostic results.

Article Details

Keywords

Quality indicators, pre-analytical phase, quality assurance

References

1. Bir A, Ghosh A, Sinha S, Banerjee A. Quality indicators are effective to monitor the performance level of preanalytical phase-a study in a clinical laboratory of eastern indiaquality indicators are effective to monitor the performance level of preanalytical phase- a study in a clinical laboratory of eastern india. Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare. 2018; 5. doi:10.18410/jebmh/2018/236.
2. Pre and Post Examination Aspects - PMC. Accessed June 14, 2023. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6028786/
3. Simundic AM, Bölenius K, Cadamuro J, et al. Joint EFLM-COLABIOCLI Recommendation for venous blood sampling. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2018; 56 (12): 2015-2038.doi :10.1515/cclm-2018-0602.
4. Trần Hữu Tâm (2015), Những vấn đề cơ bản trong đảm bảo chất lượng xét nghiệm Y khoa, Nhà xuất bản Y học, TP Hồ Chí Minh.
5. Hammerling JA. A Review of Medical Errors in Laboratory Diagnostics and Where We Are Today. Laboratory Medicine. 2012; 43(2):41-44.doi: 10.1309/LM6ER9WJR1IHQAUY.
6. Sciacovelli L, Padoan A, Aita A, Basso D, Plebani M. Quality indicators in laboratory medicine: state-of-the-art, quality specifications and future strategies. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2023; 61(4): 688-695.doi: 10.1515/cclm-2022-1143.
7. Sciacovelli L, Plebani M. The IFCC Working Group on laboratory errors andpatient safety. Clin Chim Acta. 2009; 404 (1): 79-85.doi:10.1016/j.cca.2009.03.025.
8. Sciacovelli L, O’Kane M, Skaik YA, et al. Quality Indicators in Laboratory Medicine: from theory to practice: Preliminary data from the IFCC Working Group Project “Laboratory Errors and Patient Safety.” Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. 2011; 49(5): 835-844. doi:10.1515/CCLM.2011.128.
9. Grecu DS, Vlad DC, Dumitrascu V. Quality Indicators in the Preanalytical Phase of Testing in a Stat Laboratory. Laboratory Medicine. 2014; 45 (1): 74-81.doi:10.1309/LM9ZY92YBZRFPFQY.
10. Mehndiratta M, Pasha EH, Chandra N, Almeida EA. Quality Indicators for Evaluating Errors in the Preanalytical Phase. J Lab Physicians. 2021; 13 (02): 169-174.doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1729473.
11. Calmarza P, Cordero J. Lipemia interferences in routine clinical biochemical tests. Biochem Med. Published online 2011: 160-166. doi:10.11613/bm.2011.025.