Article Sidebar

PDF (Tiếng Việt)
Published: 2024-11-11
Abstract Views: 0
Views PDF (Tiếng Việt): 0
DOI: https://doi.org/10.52852/tcncyh.v183i10.2887
Issue
Vol. 183 No. 10 (2024)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Lượng, Đinh V., Linh, L. T., Đức, Đặng D., Thành, N. T., Việt, H. T. B., & Dương, V. Q. (2024). Evaluation of Outcomes of Single-Port and Double-Port Thoracoscopic Surgery in Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients at the National Lung Hospital. Journal of Medical Research, 183(10), 131-139. https://doi.org/10.52852/tcncyh.v183i10.2887

Evaluation of Outcomes of Single-Port and Double-Port Thoracoscopic Surgery in Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients at the National Lung Hospital

Dinh Van Luong, Le Tu Linh, Dang Duy Duc, Nguyen Trung Thanh, Hoang Thi Bich Viet, Vu Quy Duong

Main Article Content

Abstract

Thoracoscopic surgery (TS) is considered the gold standard for the treatment of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. This is a cross-sectional, retrospective study of 465 patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for lung tumor resection from June 2016 to December 2023. Results: Among 465 patients, 159 underwent single-port VATs (34.2%), while 306 underwent double-port thoracoscopic surgery (65.8%). Most patients underwent lobectomy (97.2%), with an average surgery time of 140 minutes for single-port VATs and 145 minutes for double-port VATs. The amount of blood loss during surgery between the two methods showed no significant difference (an average of 130ml compared to 142ml). A single-port technique, has advantages over the double-port technique in all three criteria: less postoperative pain assessed by the VAS score, shorter drainage removal time, and shorter hospital stay after surgery. There is no difference in postoperative complications, DFS, and OS between the two study groups.

Article Details

Keywords

Early-stage NSCLC, VATs, Single-port, Double-port

References

1. Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024; 74(3): 229-263. doi:10.3322/caac.21834.
2. Berfield KS, Farjah F, Mulligan MS. Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy for Lung Cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2019; 107(2): 603-609. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.07.088.
3. Congregado M, Merchan RJ, Gallardo G, Ayarra J, Loscertales J. Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy: 13 years’ experience. Surg Endosc. 2008; 22(8): 1852-1857. doi:10.1007/s00464-007-9720-z.
4. Bin Yameen TA, Gupta V, Behzadi A. Uniportal versus multiportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in the treatment of lung cancer: a Canadian single-centre retrospective study. cjs. 2019; 62(6): 468-474. doi:10.1503/cjs.001418.
5. Choi SY, Moon Y. Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for the treatment of early-stage lung cancer with whole pleural adhesion. Transl Cancer Res TCR. 2022; 11(1): 72-84. doi:10.21037/tcr-21-2113.
6. Phạm Hữu Lư, Nguyễn Mạnh Hiệp (2021). Kết quả phẫu thuật nội soi lồng ngực một lỗ điều trị ung thư phổi không tế bào nhỏ giai đoạn sớm tại Bệnh viện Hữu nghị Việt Đức. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam, Số 1 - tháng 10 - 2021
7. Nguyễn Khắc Kiểm, Nguyễn Xuân Hậu, Đỗ Xuân Tùng (2023). Kết quả phẫu thuật nội soi lồng ngực một lỗ điều trị ung thư phổi không tế bào nhỏ bệnh nhân cao tuổi tại Bệnh viện K. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam, Số 1 - tháng 11 - 2023
8. Dai W, Dai Z, Wei X, et al. Early Patient-Reported Outcomes After Uniportal vs Multiportal Thoracoscopic Lobectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2022; 114(4): 1229-1237. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.08.058.
9. Pierfilippo C, Filippo L, Giovanni T, et al. Uniportal VATS Lobectomy for Lung Cancer: Feasibility and Cost Effectiveness in a Single Center Experience. Arch Cancer Biol Ther. 2020; Volume 1(Issue 1): 1-10. doi:10.33696/cancerbiology.1.001.
10. Cheng YF, Huang CL, Hung WH, Cheng CY, Wang BY. The perioperative outcomes of uniport versus two-port and three-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022; 17(1): 284. doi:10.1186/s13019-022-02034-y.
11. Chung JH, Choi YS, Cho JH, et al. Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: an alternative to conventional thoracoscopic lobectomy in lung cancer surgery? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015; 20(6): 813-819. doi:10.1093/icvts/ivv034.
12. Harris CG, James RS, Tian DH, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of uniportal versus multiportal video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2016; 5(2): 76-84. doi:10.21037/acs.2016.03.17.
13. Sano Y, Okazaki M, Shigematsu H, et al. Quality of life after partial lung resection with uniportal versus 3-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a prospective randomized controlled study. Surg Today. 2021; 51(11): 1755-1763. doi:10.1007/s00595-021-02294-6.
14. Moon Y. Initial experience with uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for the treatment of lung cancer performed by a surgeon who did not have previous experience performing multiportal thoracoscopic surgery: a single center retrospective study. J Thorac Dis. 2020; 12(5): 1972-1981. doi:10.21037/jtd-20-242.