17. Evaluation of treatment outcome of both-bone forearm fracture with two plates using single volar approach
Main Article Content
Abstract
This is an intervention study without a control group evaluating the results of treatment of both-bone forearm fractures with two plates through a mid-volar incision exposing two windows. The study included 27 patients aged 16 years or older who received surgical treatment for both-bone at the Center for Trauma and Orthopedics of Can Tho Central General Hospital, between July 2023 and October 2024. All patients underwent internal fixation with plates and screws. Fractures of the left forearm were found in 51.9% of cases. Notably, 74.1% of the patients had fractures at the same level. The mean duration of surgeries was 71.85 ± 19.47 minutes, with an average incision length of 8.89 ± 1.74 cm. Postoperative complications included one patient with hematoma observed on the second day (3.7%), one patient with slight ulnar deviation post-surgery (3.7%). According to the Anderson criteria, 81.5% of patients achieved excellent outcomes and 18.5% had good results. Utilizing a volar approach with plates and screws for the surgical treatment of both-bone forearm fractures proves to be an effective strategy, yielding high success rates and minimizing complications.
Article Details
Keywords
Both-bones forearm fracture, single volar approach, dual window approach, Anderson criteria
References
2. Procaccini R, Martiniani M, Farinelli L, et al. A New Single Volar Approach for Both-Bone Fractures of the Forearm: The Mediolateral Windows Approach Extended. Techniques in hand & upper extremity surgery. Sep 2020; 24(3): 114-118. doi:10.1097/bth.0000000000000277.
3. Anderson LD, Sisk D, Tooms RE, et al. Compression-plate fixation in acute diaphyseal fractures of the radius and ulna. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1975 Apr; 57(3): 287-97.4.
4. Phạm Ngọc Thắng, Thái Ngọc Bình. Kết quả điều trị gãy kín thân xương cẳng tay bằng nẹp vít tại bệnh viện quân y 103. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam. 08/30 2023; 529(1B)doi:10.51298/vmj.v529i1B.6401.
5. Tran D. The Surgical Outcomes of Diaphyseal Fractures of Radius and Ulna treated by Plate and Screws Fixation in Vietnam. Open Journal of Trauma. 11/09 2017; 1:066-068. doi:10.17352/ojt.000013.
6. Đặng Hoàng Anh, Nguyễn Ảnh Sang, Nguyễn Văn Bình, cộng sự. Một số đặc điểm lâm sàng của bệnh nhân bị gãy kín thân hai xương cẳng tay được điều trị phẫu thuật kết xương nẹp vít khóa. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam. 10/06 2023; 530(2)doi:10.51298/vmj.v530i2.6801.
7. Nguyễn Lâm Minh Tân, Trần Văn Dương, Nguyễn Thành Tấn, Phạm Việt Triều. Kết quả điều trị gãy kín thân hai xương cẳng tay bằng phương pháp kết hợp xương nẹp vít. Tạp chí Y Dược học Cần Thơ. 08/25 2022; (49): 112-119. doi:10.58490/ctump.2022i49.223.
8. Wahsh AA. Exposure of both the radius and ulna through a single posterior incision: a technical note. Sicot-j. Jul 23 2015; 1:21. doi:10.1051/sicotj/2015024.
9. Polat O, Toy S. Comparison of the clinical and radiographic outcomes of plate fixation versus new-generation locked intramedullary nail in the management of adult forearm diaphyseal fractures. Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica. Sep 2022; 56(5): 321-326. doi:10.5152/j.aott.2022.21190.
10. Mares O, Graves MA, Bosch C, et al. A new single volar approach for epiphyseal ulnar and radial-sided comminutive fracture of the distal radius: the mediolateral windows approach. Techniques in hand & upper extremity surgery. Mar 2012; 16(1): 37-41. doi:10.1097/BTH.0b013e3182351dfc.