2. Comparison of Sysmex XN-10, Beckman Coulter DxH900 và Siemens Advia 2120i Automated Hematology Analyzers

Nguyen Thi Duyen, Phan Thi Tien, Luong Thi Nghiem, Cao Viet Tung, Phan Huu Phuc, Tran Minh Dien, Tran Thi Chi Mai

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the concordance among three automated hematology analyzers: Sysmex XN-10, Beckman Coulter DxH900, and Siemens Advia 2120i. A total of 120 pediatric blood samples were evaluated, focusing on key hematological parameters, including WBC, NEU, LYM, MONO, EO, BASO, RBC, HGB, HCT, MCV, RDW, PLT, and MPV. The analysis revealed that between the Sysmex XN-10 and Beckman Coulter DxH900 systems, only three parameters (EO, HCT, PLT) showed concordance. While most of the remaining parameters lacked agreement, they exhibited strong correlations (r² > 0.9), except for BASO and MPV, which demonstrated no correlation. Comparisons between the Sysmex XN-10 and Siemens Advia 2120i systems indicated no parameter-level agreement, with most parameters being correlated; however, MONO, BASO, and MPV showed no correlation. These findings highlight that while these systems can operate concurrently in clinical laboratories, it is crucial to establish system-specific reference ranges or utilize conversion reference ranges for correlated parameters to ensure accuracy and consistency in hematological assessments.

Article Details

References

1. Daves M, Roccaforte V, Lombardi F, et al. Modern hematology analyzers: beyond the simple blood cells count (with focus on the red blood cells). Journal of Laboratory and Precision Medicine. 2024; 9(0).
2. Bruegel M, Nagel D, Funk M, et al. Comparison of five automated hematology analyzers in a university hospital setting: Abbott Cell-Dyn Sapphire, Beckman Coulter DxH 800, Siemens Advia 2120i, Sysmex XE-5000, and Sysmex XN-2000. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM). 2015; 53(7): 1057-1071.
3. Sysmex Corporation. Technical Information. Automated Hematology Analyzer XN Series (XN-1000) Instruction for Use. Kobe, Japan. 2017; 15.21 - 15.28.
4. Siemens Healthineers. Methods. ADVIA 2120/2120i Hematology System Operator’s Guide. 2023; 641 - 730.
5. Beckman Coulter, Inc. Operation Principle. Instructions for Use: UniCel DxH Slidemaker Stainer II Coulter Cellular Analysis System (Version 1). 250 S. Kraemer Blvd, Brea, CA, 92821, USA. 2017; 2.1 - 2.17.
6. Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute. User Verification of Precision & Estimation of Bias. Approved Guideline -Third Edition (EP15A3). 2014; Vol. 34 No. 12. ISBN 1- 56238-966-1 (Electronic).
7. Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute. Measurement Procedure Comparision & Bias Estimation Using Patient Sample; Approved Guideline -Third Edition (EP09A3). 2013; Vol. 33 No.11. ISBN 1- 56238-888-6 (Electronic).
8. Aarsand AK, Fernandez-Calle P, Webster C, Gonzales-Lao E, Diaz-Garzon J, et al.
Cơ sở dữ liệu biến thể sinh học EFLM. https://biologicalvariation.eu/ truy cập ngày 15/11/2024.
9. Meintker L, Ringwald J, Rauh M, Krause SW. Comparison of automated differential blood cell counts from Abbott Sapphire, Siemens Advia 120, Beckman Coulter DxH 800, and Sysmex XE-2100 in normal and pathologic samples. Am J Clin Pathol. 2013; 139(5):641-650.
10. Tan BT, Nava AJ, George TI. Evaluation of the Beckman Coulter UniCel DxH 800, Beckman Coulter LH 780, and Abbott Diagnostics Cell-Dyn Sapphire hematology analyzers on adult specimens in a tertiary care hospital. Am J Clin Pathol. 2011; 135(6): 939-951.
11. Kang SH, Kim HK, Ham CK, Lee DS, Cho HI. Comparison of four hematology analyzers, CELL-DYN Sapphire, ADVIA 120, Coulter LH 750, and Sysmex XE-2100, in terms of clinical usefulness. Int J Lab Hematol. 2008; 30(6): 480-486.