Comparison of biochemical testing results between two automated analyzers Olympus AU640 and dxc 700AU
Main Article Content
Abstract
Laboratories with multiple analyzers and testing procedures need to compare test results to evaluate the equivalence of assays within the same system. This study was conducted to assess the comparability of routine biochemical test results of urea, creatinine, AST, ALT, cholesterol, triglycerides, and glucose-between the Olympus AU640 and the DxC 700AU Beckman Coulter analyzers at the Agricultural General Hospital. The study was performed using leftover plasma samples after routine testing, following an experimental laboratory design based on CLSI guideline EP09. Each sample was analyzed once on each analyzer, and the Method Validator software by Philip Marquez was used to assess the comparability of 40 patient samples between the two analyzers via Bland-Altman difference plots. Further comparisons were conducted using both Bland-Altman plots and Passing–Bablok regression. The results showed that all seven test parameters (triglycerides, cholesterol, creatinine, urea, glucose, AST, and ALT) had strong correlations and mean biases within the allowable error limits defined by CLIA when compared between the Olympus AU640 and DxC 700AU analyzers. We conclude that the laboratory can alternately use the two analyzers in routine practice or consider establishing an internal correction factor based on the derived regression equations. However, it is recommended to implement an internal protocol to manage systematic bias between the two systems.
Article Details
Keywords
Mesurement procedure comparison, EP 09 CLSI, Olympus AU640, DxC 700AU
References
2. E C Taylor , B Sethi (2011). Stability of 27 biochemistry analytes in storage at a range of temperatures after centrifugation. Br J Biomed Sci. 2011; 68(3): 147-57. doi: 10.1080/09674845.2011.11730343.
3. Philippe Marquis, Service de biochimie Centre hospitalier, Metz – France. Comparison of analytical methods in clinical chemistry.
4. EP09: Compare Measurement Procedures & Estimate Bias. Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute. Accessed May 23, 2023.
5. Küme T, Sağlam B, Ergon C, Sisman AR. Evaluation and comparison of Abbott Jaffe and enzymatic creatinin methods: Could the old method meet the new requirements. J Clin Lab Anal. 2018; 32(1).
6. Suchitra Kumari , Jyotirmayee Bahinipati , Tapaswini Pradhan , Durgesh P Sahoo. Comparison of test performance of biochemical parameters in semiautomatic method and fully automatic analyzer method. J Fam Med Prim Care. 2020; 9(8): 3994–4000.