Evaluation of the accuracy of quantitative tests analyzed on the Alinity ci system
Main Article Content
Abstract
The accuracy of diagnostic testing methods is a crucial factor in ensuring diagnostic quality. This study was conducted to evaluate the accuracy, including both precision and bias of the tests analyzed on the Alinity ci system at Laboratory A5, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Hanoi Medical University Hospital, before considering as routine implementation. The study followed the CLSI EP15-A3 guidelines. The results showed that 13 out of 14 biochemical indices met acceptable precision and bias criteria. Moreover, the CALCI index was evaluated based on the total allowable error (TEa) according to CLIA standards. Additionally, all 9 immunological indices demonstrated acceptable precision and bias. Thus, a total of 23 biochemical and immunological test indices were evaluated and confirmed to meet the accuracy requirements for routine implementation on the Alinity ci automated analysis system in Laboratory A5, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Hanoi Medical University Hospital.
Article Details
Keywords
Accuracy, CLSI EP15-A3, Alinity ci
References
2. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Accuracy and Precision in Laboratory Testing. Published online 2021.
3. Alinity ci-series | Core Laboratory at Abbott. Accessed March 26, 2025. https://www.corelaboratory.abbott/int/en/offerings/brands/alinity/alinity-ci-series.html#.
4. Seo JD, Song DY, Nam Y, et al. Evaluation of analytical performance of Alinity i system on 31 measurands. Pract Lab Med. 2020; 22:e00185. doi:10.1016/j.plabm.2020.e00185.
5. Lapić I, Šegulja ,Dragana, Dukić, Kristina, et al. Analytical validation of 39 clinical chemistry tests and 17 immunoassays on the Alinity analytical system. Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation. 2022; 82(3): 199-209. doi:10.1080/00365513.2022.2056856.
6. Westgard S, Petrides V, Schneider S, Berman M, Herzogenrath J, Orzechowski A. Assessing precision, bias and sigma-metrics of 53 measurands of the Alinity ci system. Clinical Biochemistry. 2017; 50(18): 1216-1221. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2017.09.005.
7. International Standard Oganization. ISO 15189:2022. ISO. Accessed June 20, 2024. https://www.iso.org/standard/76677.html.
8. thuvienphapluat.vn. Quyết định 2429/QĐ-BYT 2017 Tiêu chí đánh giá mức chất lượng phòng xét nghiệm y học. Thư viện pháp luật. January 29, 2024. Accessed July 1, 2024. https://thuvienphapluat.vn/van-ban/The-thao-Y-te/Quyet-dinh-2429-QD-BYT-2017-Tieu-chi-danh-gia-muc-chat-luong-phong-xet-nghiem-y-hoc-351985.aspx.
9. EP15 A3 User Verification of Precision & Bias Estimation. Accessed March 26, 2025. https://clsi.org/standards/products/method-evaluation/documents/ep15/.
10. Taher J, Cosme J, Renley BA, Daghfal DJ, Yip PM. A novel Sigma metric encompasses global multi-site performance of 18 assays on the Abbott Alinity system. Clinical Biochemistry. 2019; 63: 106-112. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2018.10.003.
11. Principles of Immunochemical Techniques Used in Clinical Laboratories | Laboratory Medicine | Oxford Academic. Accessed March 27, 2025. https://academic.oup.com/labmed/article-abstract/37/8/490/2504511.