Article Sidebar

PDF (Tiếng Việt)
Published: 2025-07-28
Abstract Views: 0
Views PDF (Tiếng Việt): 0
DOI: https://doi.org/10.52852/tcncyh.v192i7.3584
Issue
Vol. 192 No. 7 (2025)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Huyền, N. T. M., Kiên, H. T., Trang, P. T. T., Đức, Đỗ V., & Diệu Hồng, Đinh. (2025). 2. Facial soft tissue characteristics on cephalometric radiographic between students with class I and III malocclusion at the UMP – VNU. Journal of Medical Research, 192(7), 9-16. https://doi.org/10.52852/tcncyh.v192i7.3584

2. Facial soft tissue characteristics on cephalometric radiographic between students with class I and III malocclusion at the UMP – VNU

Nguyen Thi Minh Huyen, Hoang Tung Kien, Pham Thi Thuy Trang, Do Van Duc, Dinh Dieu Hong1
1 Trường Đại học Y Dược, Đại học Quốc gia Hà Nội

Main Article Content

Abstract

This cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted to compare the characteristics of soft tissue on lateral cephalometric radiographs among students with Class I and Class III malocclusion groups at the University of Medicine and Pharmacy – Vietnam National University, Hanoi 97 subjects were selected according to specific inclusion and exclusion criteria And underwent clinical examination and lateral cephalometric radiography. Soft tissue parameters were measured using Webceph software, and data were analyzed with SPSS 20.0. The results and conclusion indicated that in male participants, indicators such as the soft tissue facial convexity angle, nasolabial angle, upper lip thickness at point AA', and chin soft tissue thickness were significantly higher in the Class III group compared to the Class I group. In contrast, most of these indicators showed no significant difference between the two occlusion types in female participants. Analyzing and comparing soft tissue parameters across different malocclusion types can support facial aesthetic assessment and improve orthodontic treatment planning.

Article Details

Keywords

Facial soft tissues, cephalometric radiographic, class I malocclusion, class III malocclusion

References

1. Cenzato N, Farronato M, Tartaglia FC, et al. Soft Tissue Facial Morphology in Growing Patients with Different Occlusal Classes. J Pers Med. 2024; 14(10): 1042. doi:10.3390/jpm14101042.
2. Moon S, Mohamed AMA, He Y, Dong W, Yaosen C, Yang Y. Extraction vs. Nonextraction on Soft-Tissue Profile Change in Patients with Malocclusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. BioMed Res Int. 2021; 2021(1): 7751516. doi:10.1155/2021/7751516.
3. Alhumadi A, Al-Khafaji T, Alyassiri AH, Alhamadi W. Gender differences in lower facial soft tissue thickness among different skeletal patterns, based on soft tissue cephalometric analysis. J Orthod Sci. 2022; 11(1): 54. doi:10.4103/jos.jos_38_22.
4. Thành LT, Phương NTT, Lan QTT, Dân VM. Tình trạng lệch lạc khớp cắn của học sinh trung học phổ thông tại huyện Yên Châu, tỉnh Sơn La. Tạp chí Y học cộng đồng. 2024; 65(6). doi:10.52163/yhc.v65i6.1706.
5. Tường LV, Hồng ĐD, Dung ĐT, Đại PH, Trang NTN. Thực trạng lệch lạc khớp cắn và nhu cầu điều trị chỉnh nha của sinh viên năm 3 trường Đại học Y Dược - Đại học Quốc gia Hà Nội 2023. Tạp Chí Y Học Việt Nam. 2024; 536(1). doi:10.51298/vmj.v536i1.8661.
6. Hùng NL. Nghiên cứu đặc điểm hình thái đầu mặt ở người kinh 18-25 tuổi để ứng dụng trong y học.
7. Kılıç N, Oktay H, Çatal G, Çelikoğlu M. Distinguishing hard and soft tissue facial morphology amonf class I and III: A cephalometric assessment. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekim Fakültesi Derg. 2018; 28(2): 194-198. doi:10.17567/ataunidfd.418976.
8. Dominique V, Nofrizal R. Degree of facial profile convexity using Subtelny’s analysis in patients aged 6 to 12 years. Maj Kedokt Gigi Indones. 2023; 9(3): 238-244. doi:10.22146/majkedgiind.81931.
9. Li X, Tian Y, Guo R, Li W, He D, Sun Y. Evaluation of the facial profile of skeletal Class III patients undergoing camouflage orthodontic treatment: a retrospective study. PeerJ. 2024; 12:e17733. doi:10.7717/peerj.17733.
10. Chaudhary A, Giri J, Gyawali R, Pokharel PR. A Retrospective Study Comparing Nose, Lip, and Chin Morphology in Class I, Class II, and Class III Skeletal Relationships in Patients Visiting to the Department of Orthodontics, BPKIHS: A Cephalometric Study. Int J Dent. 2022; 2022:2252746. doi:10.1155/2022/2252746.
11. Kale B, Buyukcavus MH. Comparison of three-dimensional soft-tissue evaluations between skeletal and pseudo-class III malocclusions. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1): 14717. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-71772-7.
12. Anh TT. Nghiên cứu một số đặc điểm hình thái, chỉ số đầu mặt ở một nhóm người Việt độ tuổi từ 18-25 có khớp cắn bình thường và khuôn mặt hài hòa. Published online 2017.
13. Naini FB, Cobourne MT, McDonald F, Garagiola U, Wertheim D. Quantitative investigation of the esthetic impact of lip prominence in relation to the esthetic line. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop Off Publ Am Assoc Orthod Its Const Soc Am Board Orthod. 2021; 159(5): 574-581. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.02.012.
14. Joshi M, Wu LP, Maharjan S, Regmi MR. Sagittal lip positions in different skeletal malocclusions: a cephalometric analysis. Prog Orthod. 2015; 16(1): 8. doi:10.1186/s40510-015-0077-x.