Histopathological and ultrastructural features of chronic renal allograft rejection in Vietnam

Le Tai The, Tran Ngoc Minh, Nguyen Sy Lanh, Tuong Phi Vuong, Thavixay Outha, Nguyen Thuy Linh, Tran Ngoc Dung

Main Article Content

Abstract

Diagnosis of chronic renal allograft rejection currently relies primarily on histopathology, but some early-stage lesions may not be clearly detected. The Banff Conference has recommended using ultrastructural analysis to improve diagnostic accuracyThis cross-sectional descriptive study included 53 patients with chronic renal allograft rejection (43 retrospective, 10 prospective) at the Military Hospital 103 and Viet Duc Hospital from 2022 to 2024. Lesions were evaluated according to Banff 2019 criteria using light microscopy, C4d immunohistochemistry, and transmission electron microscopy for ultrastructural analysis. Chronic T cell-mediated rejection was most common (31/53, 58.5%), followed by chronic antibody-mediated rejection (16/53, 30.2%) and mixed rejection (6/53, 11.3%). Lesion scores g0 and cg0 accounted for 60.3% and 79.2% respectively. C4d was positive in 56.6% of cases. Ultrastructural analysis revealed characteristic lesions: glomerular capillary basement membrane thickening, endothelial serrated appearance, podocyte foot process effacement (ABMR); interstitial collagen fiber proliferation, peritubular capillary basement membrane thickening, inflammatory cell infiltration (TCMR). Ultrastructural analysis provides more detailed information than conventional histopathology and has value in supporting accurate diagnosis of chronic renal allograft rejection.

Article Details

References

1. Codina S, Manonelles A, Tormo M, et al. Chronic Kidney Allograft Disease: New Concepts and Opportunities. Front Med. 2021;8:660334. doi:10.3389/fmed.2021.660334
2. Thongprayoon C, Hansrivijit P, Leeaphorn N, et al. Recent Advances and Clinical Outcomes of Kidney Transplantation. J Clin Med. 2020;9(4):1193. doi:10.3390/jcm9041193
3. Peabody J, Billings P, Valdenor C, et al. Variation in Assessing Renal Allograft Rejection: A National Assessment of Nephrology Practice. Int J Nephrol. 2019;2019:1-6. doi:10.1155/2019/5303284
4. Nông Bích Hồng, Nguyễn Thúy Hương, Nguyễn Sỹ Lánh, và cs. Tỷ lệ các loại thải ghép trên mẫu sinh thiết thận thải ghép tại Bệnh viện Việt Đức giai đoạn 2015 - 2021. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam. 2022;521:216-220.
5. Loupy A, Haas M, Roufosse C, et al. The Banff 2019 Kidney Meeting Report (I): Updates on and clarification of criteria for T cell– and antibody-mediated rejection. Am J Transplant. 2020;20(9):2318-2331. doi:10.1111/ajt.15898
6. Lê Tài Thế, Trần Ngọc Minh, Trần Danh Nhân, và cs. Tổng quan về nghiên cứu siêu cấu trúc mô y sinh học trên kính hiển vi điện tử truyền qua. Tạp chí Nghiên cứu Y học. 2025;189(4).
7. Wang NS, Minassian H. The formaldehyde-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissues for diagnostic transmission electron microscopy: A retrospective and prospective study. Hum Pathol. 1987;18(7):715-727. doi:10.1016/S0046-8177(87)80243-5
8. Lighezan R, Baderca F, Alexa A, et al. The value of the reprocessing method of paraffin-embedded biopsies for transmission electron microscopy.
9. Bashir S, Hussain M, Ali Khan A, et al. Renal Transplant Pathology: Demographic Features and Histopathological Analysis of the Causes of Graft Dysfunction. Anglan F, ed. Int J Nephrol. 2020;2020:1-7. doi:10.1155/2020/7289701
10. Katsuma A, Yamakawa T, Nakada Y, et al. Histopathological findings in transplanted kidneys. Ren Replace Ther. 2017;3(1):6. doi:10.1186/s41100-016-0089-0
11. Ivanyi B, Kemeny E, Szederkenyi E, et al. The Value of Electron Microscopy in the Diagnosis of Chronic Renal Allograft Rejection. Mod Pathol. 2001;14(12):1200-1208. doi:10.1038/modpathol.3880461
12. Shore I, Moss J. Electron microscopy in diagnostic renal pathology. Curr Diagn Pathol. 2002;8(4):207-215. doi:10.1054/cdip. 2002.0123
13. Haas M, Mirocha J. Early Ultrastructural Changes in Renal Allografts: Correlation With Antibody-Mediated Rejection and Transplant Glomerulopathy. Am J Transplant. 2011;11(10):2123-2131. doi:10.1111/j.1600-614 3.2011.03647.x
14. Brocker V, Pfaffenbach A, Habicht A, et al. Beyond C4d: the ultrastructural appearances of endothelium in ABO-incompatible renal allografts. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2013;28(12):3101-3109. doi:10.1093/ndt/gft 373
15. De Kort H, Moran L, Roufosse C. The role of electron microscopy in renal allograft biopsy evaluation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2015;20(3):333-342. doi:10.1097/MOT.0000000000000183
16. Gibson IW. Transplant Glomerulopathy: Importance of Ultrastructural Examination. Glomerular Dis. 2021;1(2):68-81. doi:10.1159 /000513522