Clinical characteristic of traumatic macular hole due to blunt trauma
Main Article Content
Abstract
By comparison to idiopathic macular hole, traumatic macular hole has distinctive clinical features, progression and prognosis. Patients with traumatic macular hole often are young people in working age and have low initial vision. Thanks to the development of OCT, we can observe, measure and calculate the parameters of the shape of traumatic macula which may be of prognostic values for treating traumatic macular hole. This is a prospective study aimed to describe the clinical characteristics of 33 eyes with traumatic macular hole caused by blunt injury. The average age of the patients was 27.33 ± 7.56 (years). All patients were male. The most common cause of injury was domestic accidents, accounting for 60,6%. Forty two percent of the patients were hospitalized 1 - 3 months after blunt injuries and a third (33.33%) came to hospital one year after blunt injuries. All patients had blurred vision; 78.8% experienced blurred vision immediately after injuries and 57.6% of the patients has visual acuity lower than 20/200, The best visual acuity among the patients was 20/80, More than half of the patients (54.6%) had the central subfield thickness less than 200 µm, 72.7% had apex diameter of the hole larger than 400 µm, 72.7% had basal diameter ranges from 1000 to 2000 µm. The macular hole index, which is ≥ 0,5, accounts for only 3%. The hole form factor, which is ≥ 0,9, accounts for 0%. The tractional hole index, which is ≤ 1.41, accounts for 100%. Complete posterior vitreous detachment occurred in 9.1% of the patients. The associated injuries included vitreous hemorrhage, lens subluxation, iridodial’s, retinal dialysis and enophthalmos. In conclusion, traumatic macular hole due to blunt injury seriously damages visual function. Poor initial vision, large diameter, measurable and calculatable OCT parameters may all lead to bad prognosis of the disease.
Article Details
Keywords
traumatic macular hole, blunt trauma
References
2. Huang J, Liu X, Wu Z, Sadda S. Comparison of full - thickness traumatic macular holes and idiopathic macular holes by optical coherence tomography. Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. 2010;248 (8):1071 - 1075.
3. Yamashita T, Uemara A, Uchino E, Doi N, Ohba N. Spontaneous closure of traumatic macular hole. Am J Ophthalmol. Feb 2002;133 (2):230 - 5. doi:10,1016/s0002 - 9394 (01)01303 - 4
4. Johnson RN, McDonald HR, Lewis H, et al. Traumatic macular hole: observations, pathogenesis, and results of vitrectomy surgery. Ophthalmology. 2001;108 (5):853 - 857.
5. Miller JB, Yonekawa Y, Eliott D, et al. Long - term follow - up and outcomes in traumatic macular holes. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 2015;160 (6):1255 - 1258. e1.
6. Ip MS, Baker BJ, Duker JS, et al. Anatomical outcomes of surgery for idiopathic macular hole as determined by optical coherence tomography. Archives of Ophthalmology. 2002;120 (1):29 - 35.
7. Ullrich S, Haritoglou C, Gass C, Schaumberger M, Ulbig M, Kampik A. Macular hole size as a prognostic factor in macular hole surgery. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 2002;86 (4):390 - 393.
8. Dai Y, Shen J, Li J, Jin X, Li Y. Optical coherence tomography predictive factors for idiopathic macular hole surgery outcome. [Zhonghua yan ke za zhi] Chinese journal of ophthalmology. 2013;49 (9):807 - 811.
9. Desai V, Hee M, Puliafito C. Optical coherence tomography of macular holes. Macular hole: pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment Oxford: Butterworth - Heinemann. 1999:37 - 47.
10, Ruiz - Moreno J, Staicu C, Pinero D, Montero J, Lugo F, Amat P. Optical coherence tomography predictive factors for macular hole surgery outcome. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 2008;92 (5):640 - 644.