Performance of the RF-CL model in predicting obstructive coronary artery disease on coronary CT angiography in patients with stable angina
Main Article Content
Abstract
This cross-sectional study included 331 patients with stable angina who underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) to evaluate the discrimination and calibration of the risk factor–weighted clinical likelihood (RF‑CL) model in predicting obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). The median age was 65.5 years old (IQR: 57.7 – 73), and 61.9% were male. The prevalence of obstructive CAD was 72.8%, reflecting a relatively high-risk population referred for CCTA in routine clinical practice. The proportion of obstructive CAD increased across RF‑CL categories of very low (≤ 5%), low (>5 – 15%), and intermediate (>15 – 50%) risk (47.4%, 64.2%, and 86.9%, respectively). RF‑CL showed moderate discrimination with an area under the ROC curve of 0.746 (95% CI: 0.686 – 0.805; p < 0.001). At the 5% RF‑CL threshold, sensitivity and specificity were 88.8% and 33.3%, respectively, whereas at the 15% threshold they were 60.6% and 75.6%. The model demonstrated good calibration (Hosmer–Lemeshow p = 0.317). Compared with the very‑low‑risk group, the low‑ and intermediate‑risk groups had approximately 3.7‑fold and 7.4‑fold higher odds of obstructive CAD. These findings suggest that the RF‑CL model may be useful for the discrimination and risk stratification of obstructive CAD in patients with stable angina undergoing CCTA; however, further validation in larger and multicenter studies is warranted.
Article Details
Keywords
Clinical likelihood, coronary computed tomography angiography, obstructive coronary artery disease, RF‑CL, stable angina
References
2. Balfour PCJ, Gonzalez JA, Kramer CM. Non-invasive assessment of low- and intermediate-risk patients with chest pain. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2017;27(3):182-189. doi:10.1016/j.tcm.2016.08.006
3. Vrints C, Andreotti F, Koskinas KC, et al. 2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2024;45(36):3415-3537. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehae177
4. Gulati M, Levy PD, Mukherjee D, et al. 2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR Guideline for the Evaluation and Diagnosis of Chest Pain: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;78(22):e187-e285. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2021.07.053
5. Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(3):407-477. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz425
6. Juarez-Orozco LE, Saraste A, Capodanno D, et al. Impact of a decreasing pre-test probability on the performance of diagnostic tests for coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;20(11):1198-1207. doi:10.1093/ehjci/jez054
7. Winther S, Schmidt SE, Rasmussen LD, et al. Validation of the European Society of Cardiology pre-test probability model for obstructive coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(14):1401-1411. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa755
8. Winther S, Schmidt SE, Mayrhofer T, et al. Incorporating Coronary Calcification Into Pre-Test Assessment of the Likelihood of Coronary Artery Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76(21):2421-2432. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2020.09.585
9. Winther S, Schmidt SE, Foldyna B, et al. Coronary Calcium Scoring Improves Risk Prediction in Patients With Suspected Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;80(21):1965-1977. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2022.08.805
10. Rasmussen LD, Williams MC, Newby DE, et al. External validation of novel clinical likelihood models to predict obstructive coronary artery disease and prognosis. Open Heart. 2023;10(2):e002457. doi:10.1136/openhrt-2023-002457
11. Yan L, Ho WW, Tan ACS, et al. The incremental value of coronary artery calcium in predicting obstructive coronary artery disease in a symptomatic mixed Asian cohort: external validation of RF-CL and CACS-CL. Eur Heart J. 2023;44(Suppl 2):ehad655.1260.
12. Frey SM, Schneider IG, Otto A, et al. Evaluation of risk factor-weighted and coronary artery calcium score-weighted clinical likelihoods as gatekeepers before advanced ischemia testing. Rev Española Cardiol. 2026;S1885-5857. doi:10.1016/j.rec.2025.12.017
13. Besutti M, Guillon B, Barthod C, et al. Diagnostic yield of referring patients for invasive coronary angiography primarily based on high CAC scores: Positive predictive value for obstructive coronary artery disease in a consecutive real-life cohort. Int J Cardiol. 2026;444:133979. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2025.133979
14. Chen T, Shao D, Zhao J, et al. Comparison of the RF-CL and CACS-CL models to estimate the pretest probability of obstructive coronary artery disease and predict prognosis in patients with stable chest pain and diabetes mellitus. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024;11:1368743. doi:10.3389/fcvm.2024.1368743
15. Leipsic J, Abbara S, Achenbach S, et al. SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary CT angiography: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2014;8(5):342-358. doi:10.1016/j.jcct.2014.07.003