Attitudes, feasibility, and acceptance of dentists toward the application of artificial intelligence in diagnosing temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis on panoramic radiographs

Nguyen Manh Thanh, Nguyen Chi Thanh, Le Thi Thu Hong, Phùng Thị Huyen, Đặng Triệu Hung, Truong Manh Nguyen, Nguyen Thi Thanh Quynh, Nguyen Thi Thu Phuong, Bui My Hanh, Le Thi Ngoc Anh, Lê Tuấn Ngoc, Pham Dac Quan

Main Article Content

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has been increasingly applied in various fields of dentistry, including radiographic image analysis and disease diagnosis. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and acceptance of AI among dental practitioners for the diagnosis of temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis (TMJOA) on panoramic radiographs. A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted among 68 dentists working at Hanoi Medical University Hospital and the School of Odonto-Stomatology. Data were collected using a 20 - item questionnaire covering four domains: feasibility, perceived benefits, barriers, and acceptance. The results showed that the mean scores across all domains were above 4,0 on a 5 - point Likert scale, with an overall mean score of 4.296 ± 0.559. The main barriers identified included implementation cost, legal framework, and data security concerns. Overall, dentists demonstrated a positive attitude toward the application of AI in the diagnosis of TMJOA.

Article Details

References

1. Jha N, Lee K sig, Kim YJ. Diagnosis of temporomandibular disorders using artificial intelligence technologies: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS ONE. 2022;17(8):e0272715. doi:10.1371/journal.pon e.0272715 
2. Lee KS, Kwak HJ, Oh JM, et al. Automated Detection of TMJ Osteoarthritis Based on Artificial Intelligence. J Dent Res. 2020;99(12):1363-1367. doi:10.1177/0022034520936950 
3. Larheim TA, Abrahamsson AK, Kristensen M, Arvidsson LZ. Temporomandibular joint diagnostics using CBCT. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol. 2015;44(1):20140235. doi:10.1259/dmfr.20140235 
4. Almășan O, Leucuța DC, Hedeșiu M, Mureșanu S, Popa Ștefan L. Temporomandibular Joint Osteoarthritis Diagnosis Employing Artificial Intelligence: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med. 2023;12(3):942. doi:10.3390/jcm12030942 
5. Mackie T, Al Turkestani N, Bianchi J, et al. Quantitative bone imaging biomarkers and joint space analysis of the articular fossa in temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis using artificial intelligence models. Front Dent Med. 2022;3:1007011. doi:10.3389/fdmed.2022.1007011 
6. Heinrichs H, Kies A, Nagel SK, Kiessling F. Physicians’ Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: Mixed Methods Survey and Interview Study. J Med Internet Res. 2025;27(1):e74187. doi:10.2196/74187 
7. Dai Q, Li M, Yang M, et al. Attitudes, Perceptions, and Factors Influencing the Adoption of AI in Health Care Among Medical Staff: Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey Study. J Med Internet Res. 2025;27(1):e75343. doi:10.2196/75343 
8. Pedro AR, Dias MB, Laranjo L, Cunha AS, Cordeiro JV. Artificial intelligence in medicine: A comprehensive survey of medical doctor’s perspectives in Portugal. PLOS ONE. 2023;18(9):e0290613. doi:10.1371/journal.pon e.0290613 
9. Poon EG, Lemak CH, Rojas JC, Guptill J, Classen D. Adoption of artificial intelligence in healthcare: survey of health system priorities, successes, and challenges. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2025;32(7):1093-1100. doi:10.1093/jamia/ocaf065 
10. Hamedani Z, Moradi M, Kalroozi F, et al. Evaluation of acceptance, attitude, and knowledge towards artificial intelligence and its application from the point of view of physicians and nurses: A provincial survey study in Iran: A cross-sectional descriptive-analytical study. Health Sci Rep. 2023;6(9):e1543. doi:10.1002/hsr2.1543 
11. Larheim TA, Abrahamsson AK, Kristensen M, Arvidsson LZ. Temporomandibular joint diagnostics using CBCT. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol. 2015;44(1):20140235. doi:10.1259/dmfr.20140235 
12. Slashcheva LD, Schroeder K, Heaton LJ, et al. Artificial intelligence-produced radiographic enhancements in dental clinical care: provider and patient perspectives. Front Oral Health. 2025;6:1473877. doi:10.3389/froh.2025.1473877 
13. Barnawi NA, AlAmmar FA, Aldabeis SA, Alahmar SM, Alharthi AA, Abolfotouh MA. Dentists’ perception and use of AI and robotics in the care of persons with disabilities. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):27551. doi:10.1038/s41598-025-10988-x 
14. Poon EG, Lemak CH, Rojas JC, Guptill J, Classen D. Adoption of artificial intelligence in healthcare: survey of health system priorities, successes, and challenges. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2025;32(7):1093-1100. doi:10.1093/jamia/ocaf065 
15. Dai Q, Li M, Yang M, et al. Attitudes, Perceptions, and Factors Influencing the Adoption of AI in Health Care Among Medical Staff: Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey Study. J Med Internet Res. 2025;27(1):e75343. doi:10.2196/75343 
16. Sharka R, Skatawi B, Sayyam G, et al. Predicting Artificial Intelligence Acceptance in Dental Treatments Among Patients in Saudi Arabia: A Perceived Risks and Benefits Perspective. Oral. 2025;5(2):28. doi:10.3390/oral5020028 
17. Pedro AR, Dias MB, Laranjo L, Cunha AS, Cordeiro JV. Artificial intelligence in medicine: A comprehensive survey of medical doctor’s perspectives in Portugal. PLOS ONE. 2023;18(9):e0290613. doi:10.1371/journal.pon e.0290613