Article Sidebar

PDF (Tiếng Việt)
Published: 2021-12-01
Abstract Views: 332
Views PDF (Tiếng Việt): 290
DOI: https://doi.org/10.52852/tcncyh.v147i11.519
Issue
Vol. 147 No. 11 (2021)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Vũ, N., & Tâm, L. Đức . (2021). Initial clinical outcomes of percutaneous full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy using an interlaminar approach at the l5/s1. Journal of Medical Research, 147(11), 177-185. https://doi.org/10.52852/tcncyh.v147i11.519

Initial clinical outcomes of percutaneous full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy using an interlaminar approach at the l5/s1

Nguyen Vu, Lê Đức Tâm

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the initial clinical outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) via interlaminar approach to L5/S1 disc herniation. A longitudinal non-controlled prospective clinical study was conducted at Hanoi Medical University Hospital from January 2019 to December 2020. Inclusion criteria included patients with L5/S1 disc herniation refractory to appropriate medical treatment after 5 - 8 weeks. During the two years, we conducted 15 PELDs via interlaminar approach. Mean age was 43.4 ± 11.26. Male accounted for 40%. On the first postoperative day, median VAS lumbar and leg pain decreased significantly postoperative with p < 0.0001, and this result remained until 12 months postoperative. The recurrent herniation requiring reoperation was not found in 2 years postoperative. Spine stability after surgery were preserved in all patients. PELD via interlaminar approach is a minimally invasive surgery with rapid recovery time and a safe and effective treatment in L5/S1 disc herniation.

Article Details

Author Biography

Lê Đức Tâm,

 

 

Keywords

Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy, interlaminar approach, disc herniation.

References

1. Panjabi MM, White AA. Basic Biomechanics of the Spine. Neurosurgery. 1980; 7(1):76-93. doi:10.1227/00006123-198007000-00014
2. Hua W, Tu J, Li S, et al. Full-endoscopic discectomy via the interlaminar approach for disc herniation at L4-L5 and L5-S1. Med (United States). 2018. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000010585.
3. Hua W, Zhang Y, Wu X, et al. Outcomes of discectomy by using full-endoscopic visualization technique via the interlaminar and transforaminal approaches in the treatment of L5-S1 disc herniation: An observational study. Med (United States). 2018. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000013456.
4. Nie H, Zeng J, Song Y, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for L5-S1 disc herniation via an interlaminar approach versus a transforaminal approach a prospective randomized controlled study with 2-year follow up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018;41:B30-B37. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000001810.
5. GP J, GM F, AE T. Clinical success of transforaminal endoscopic discectomy with foraminotomy: a retrospective evaluation. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2013; 115(10):1961-1965. doi:10.1016/J.CLINEURO.2013.05.033.
6. Lee S, Kim S-K, Lee S-H, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for migrated disc herniation: classification of disc migration and surgical approaches. Eur Spine J. 2007; 16(3):431. doi:10.1007/S00586-006-0219-4.
7. A S, AG Y, MO A, et al. Fully endoscopic interlaminar and transforaminal lumbar discectomy: short-term clinical results of 163 surgically treated patients. World Neurosurg. 2014; 82(5):884-890. doi:10.1016/J.WNEU.2014.05.032.
8. PS G, MW van T, CM D, WC P, BS H. Clinical outcomes after percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a prospective case series. Neurosurg Focus. 2016; 40(2):1-7. doi:10.3171/2015.10.FOCUS15484.
9. S R, M K, H M, G G. Full-endoscopic interlaminar and transforaminal lumbar discectomy versus conventional microsurgical technique: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008; 33(9):931-939. doi:10.1097/BRS.0B013E31816C8AF7.
10. Y A, SH L, WM P, HY L, SW S, HY K. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for recurrent disc herniation: surgical technique, outcome, and prognostic factors of 43 consecutive cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004;29(16). doi:10.1097/01.BRS.0000134591.32462.98.
11. AT Y, PM T. Posterolateral endoscopic excision for lumbar disc herniation: Surgical technique, outcome, and complications in 307 consecutive cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002; 27(7):722-731. doi:10.1097/00007632-200204010-00009.
12. Y A. Transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy: technical tips to prevent complications. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2012; 9(4):361-366. doi:10.1586/ERD.12.23.
13. FU H, T P, L Q, P K. A prospective, randomized study comparing the results of open discectomy with those of video-assisted arthroscopic microdiscectomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999; 81(7):958-965. doi:10.2106/00004623-199907000-00008.