Imaging characteristics of FDG PET/CT and it’s concordance with MRI and EEG in children with drug – resistant focal epilepsy

Dong Thi Hai Chau, Nguyen Thi Thao, Nguyen Thi Bich Van, Le Quang Hien, Thieu Thi Hang, Mai Thi Chung, Pham Van Thai, Mai Hong Son

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aimed to describe the cerebral 18F-FDG (18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose) metabolic imaging characteristics using PET/CT (Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography) and to evaluate the concordance of FDG PET/CT with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and video electroencephalography (EEG) in children with drug-resistant focal epilepsy (DRE). A retrospective cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted on 42 pediatric DRE patients at the 108 Military Central Hospital from January 2017 to January 2026. The FDG PET/CT scanning, patient preparation, and anesthesia/sedation protocols were strictly performed in accordance with the SNMMI/EANM and the Ministry of Health guidelines. Images were evaluated using visual assessment combined with semi-quantitative indices. The results showed that FDG PET/CT detected metabolic abnormalities in 35/42 cases (83.3%; 95% CI: 69.8 - 92.5%). The lesions were predominantly characterized by hypometabolism (94.3%), focal pattern (80%), and multifocal distribution (51.4%). The frontal lobe was the most common single-lobe location (25.7%). The mean asymmetry index (AI%) at the lesional areas reached 17.66 ± 6.16%. In multimodal comparison, the complete concordance rate of FDG PET/CT with EEG was 62.9% and with MRI was 28.6%. Notably, in the subgroup of pediatric patients with negative brain MRI, FDG PET/CT still identified abnormalities in 25 cases (accounting for 71.4% of all positive PET scans). FDG PET/CT demonstrates the ability to detect areas of cerebral metabolic abnormalities with diverse phenotypes in pediatric patients with DRE. Although it is not the gold standard for defining the epileptogenic zone, FDG PET/CT serves as an important adjunctive diagnostic modality in multimodal presurgical evaluation, being particularly valuable in providing localizing information for the MRI-negative pediatric subgroup.

Article Details

References

1. Tóth M, Barsi P, Tóth Z, et al. The role of hybrid FDG-PET/MRI on decision-making in presurgical evaluation of drug-resistant epilepsy. BMC Neurol. 2021;21(1):363. doi:10.1186/s12883-021-02352-z.
2. Flaus A, Mellerio C, Rodrigo S, et al. 18F-FDG PET/MR in focal epilepsy: a new step for improving the detection of epileptogenic lesions. Epilepsy Res. 2021;178:106819. doi:10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2021.106819.
3. Ponisio MR, Zempel JM, Willie JT, et al. FDG-PET/MRI in the presurgical evaluation of pediatric epilepsy. Pediatr Radiol. 2024;54(10):1589-1602. doi:10.1007/s00247-024-06011-6
4. Guo J, Guo M, Liu R, et al. Seizure outcome after surgery for refractory epilepsy diagnosed by 18F-FDG PET/MRI: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg. 2023;173:34-43. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2023.01.114
5. Courtney MR, Antonic-Baker A, Chen Z, et al. Association of localizing 18F-FDG-PET hypometabolism and outcome following epilepsy surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurology. 2024;102(9):e209304. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000209304
6. Steinbrenner M, Duncan JS, Dickson J, et al. Utility of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in presurgical evaluation of patients with epilepsy: a multicenter study. Epilepsia. 2022;63(5):1238-1252. doi:10.1111/epi.17194
7. Guedj E, Varrone A, Boellaard R, et al. EANM procedure guidelines for brain PET imaging using [18F]FDG, version 3. Eur J NuCI Med Mol Imaging. 2022;49(2):632-651. doi:10.1007/s00259-021-05603-w
8. Kwan P, Arzimanoglou A, Berg AT, et al. Definition of drug-resistant epilepsy: consensus proposal by the ad hoc Task Force of the ILAE Evidence-Based Guideline Development Holding Committee. Epilepsia. 2010;51(6):1069-1077. doi:10.1111/j.1528-1167.2009.02397.x
9. Fisher RS, Cross JH, French JA, et al. Operational CIassification of seizure types by the International League Against Epilepsy: Position paper of the ILAE Commission for CIassification and Terminology. Epilepsia. 2017;58(4):522-530. doi:10.1111/epi.13670
10. Bộ Y tế. Hướng dẫn quy trình kỹ thuật chuyên ngành Gây mê hồi sức. Ban hành kèm theo Quyết định số 1904/QĐ-BYT. Hà Nội: Bộ Y tế; 2014.
11. Muhlhofer W, Tan YL, Mueller SG, Knowles J. The prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET in anatomic localization and outcome prediction of epilepsy surgery. Neurology. 2017;88(17):1662-1669. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000003868
12. Chassoux F, Landré E, Mellerio C, et al. 18F-FDG PET patterns of focal cortical dysplasia and CIinico-electrical correlations. Brain. 2010;133(Pt 6):1591-1604. doi:10.1093/brain/awq110
13. Chaudhary SJ, Gupta A. Pediatric Epilepsy Surgery: Preoperative Assessment and Surgical Outcomes. Indian J Pediatr. 2021;88(11):1112-1118.
14. Chugani HT. PET in the CIinical Evaluation of Children with Surgery for Epilepsy. Nature Reviews Neurology. 2014;10(4):210-226. doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2014.35
15. Juhász C, Chugani HT, Muzik O, Chugani DC. Interictal PET metabolic patterns in children with epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2000;41(Suppl 3):S12-S18.
16. Archambaud F, Bouilleret V, Hertz-Pannier L, et al. Optimizing automated asymmetry analysis of 18F-FDG PET images in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. J NuCI Med. 2006;47(7):1129-1135.