Outcomes of video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL) for penile cancer treatment at Viet Duc University Hospital

Huu Thao Nguyen, Tien Dung Nguyen, Hoang Lam Lai, Nguyễn Quang, Hong Tuan Vu

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study was conducted on 65 patients with penile cancer at Viet Duc University Hospital from 2017 to 2025 to evaluate the outcomes of video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL). The mean age was 52.3 ± 11.5 (years old) with the majority at stage pT1 (58.5%). The mean operative time was 155.7 ± 55.0 (minutes). VEIL ensured oncological radicality, with a mean lymph node yield of 8.4 nodes on the right and 8.0 nodes on the left, which is comparable to open surgery reports in the literature. The advantage of this procedure is the minimization of skin flap complications, with infection and skin necrosis rates of 0%, while the incidence of seroma formation was 10.8%. Long-term follow-up revealed a cancer-specific survival rate of 95.3% and an overall survival rate of 93.9%. The study shows that VEIL is a safe and effective technique that minimizes complications while optimizing oncological outcomes.

Article Details

References

1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Penile Cancer. Version 1.2026. National Comprehensive Cancer Network; 2026. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/guidelines-detail?id=1456.
2. Ma Y, Hao J, Yin H, et al. A laparoscopic radical inguinal lymphadenectomy approach partly preserving great saphenous vein branches can benefit for patients with penile carcinoma. BMC Surg. 2022;22(1):138. doi:10.1186/s12893-022-01582-3
3. Correa AF. Technical management of inguinal lymph-nodes in penile cancer: open versus minimal invasive. Transl Androl Urol. 2021;10(5):2264-2271. doi:10.21037/tau.2020.04.02
4. Falcone M, Gül M, Peretti F, et al. Inguinal Lymphadenectomy for Penile Cancer: An Interim Report from a Trial Comparing Open Versus Videoendoscopic Surgery Using a Within-patient Design. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2024;63:31-37. doi:10.1016/j.euros.2024.02.007
5. Tobias-Machado M, Ornellas AA, Hidaka AK, et al. Long-term oncological and surgical outcomes after Video Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy (VEIL) in patients with penile cancer. Int Braz J Urol. 2023;49(5):580-589. doi:10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2023.0065
6. European Association of Urology. EAU-ASCO Guidelines on Penile Cancer. European Association of Urology; 2025. https://uroweb.org/guidelines/penile-cancer.
7. Sharma P, Zargar H, Spiess PE. Surgical Advances in Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection: Optimizing Treatment Outcomes. Urol Clin North Am. 2016;43(4):457-468. doi:10.1016/j.ucl.2016.06.007
8. Alqudrah F, Passarelli R, Sykes J, Islam R, Chua K, Ghodoussipour S. Video-endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL) oncological and surgical benefits compared to open inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND). J Mens Health. 2024;20(7):20-25. doi:10.22514/jomh.2024.106
9. Trần Đoàn Thiên Quốc, Đặng Quang Tuấn, Nguyễn Công Minh, Mai Bá Tiến Dũng. Đánh giá kết quả nạo hạch bẹn nội soi trong ung thư dương vật ở 14 trường hợp đầu tiên tại Bệnh viện Bình Dân. Tạp chí Y học Cộng đồng. 2024; 65 (CĐ 4- Hội Y học giới tính Việt Nam). doi: 10.52163/yhc.v65iCD4.1183