Evaluating the clinical, X-RAY characteristics from patients performed 1-stage lateral sinus lift with simultaneous implant placement

Pham Thu Hang, Dam Van Viet, Tran Thi My Hanh

Main Article Content

Abstract

To evaluate the characteristics of jawbone density, soft tissue biotype, thickness and width of keratinized gingivae at implant sites. The case study on a cluster of 24 patients from 1-stage lateral sinus lift surgery with 33 dental implants performed. The highest prevalence of bone mineral density (BMD) type was D3 with a rate of 69.8%; The thick soft tissue and thin soft tissue accounted for 54.5% and 45.5% respectively; male patients had a higher percentage of thick tissue biotype with a rate of 59.1% while female patients had a higher percentage of thin tissue biotype with a rate of 54.5%; The mean thickness of keratinized gingivae was 2.7 ± 0.7 mm in the premolar group; 3.2 ± 0.3 mm in the molar group, the mean width of keratinized gingivae was 4.1 ± 0.7 mm for the premolar group; 5.2 ± 1.0 mm for the molar group. The BMD in the posterior maxillary region was mainly D3 type with a rate of 69.8%. The thick tissue biotype had a higher prevalence with a rate of 54.5%. There was no significant difference between males and females in soft tissue biotype. The mean thickness of keratinized gingivae was 2.7 ± 0.7 mm in the premolar group; 3.2 ± 0.3 mm in the molar group, the mean width of keratinized gingivae was 4.1 ± 0.7 mm for the premolar group; 5.2 ± 1.0 mm for the molar group. A statistically significant difference was found in the thickness and width of keratinized gingivae between premolar and molar groups.

Article Details

References

1. Pandey K. Imaging Techniques for Dental Implants: Review Article. Br J Med Med Res. 2016;18(7):1–8.
2. Tina Chugh, Abhay Kumar Jain, Raj Kumar Jaiswal, et al. Bone density and its importance in orthodontics. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2013; 3(2): 92–97.
3. Trương Mạnh Nguyên, Nguyễn Viết Đa Đô. Đặc điểm lâm sàng, X quang ở những bệnh nhân cắm implant ở hàm trên cần ghép xương và nâng xoang hở. Tạp chí Y học Thực Hành. 2013; 870 (5): 32-34.
4. Đàm Văn Việt. Nghiên cứu điều trị mất răng hàm trên từng phần bằng implant có ghép xương. Luận án tiến sĩ y học. 2013;109.
5. Chung D.M., Oh T.-J., Shotwell J.L., et al. Significance of Keratinized Mucosa in Maintenance of Dental Implants With Different Surfaces. J Periodontol. 2006; 77(8):1410–1420.
6. Trương Uyên Cường, Trần Thị Lan Anh. Nhận xét đặc điểm lâm sàng, x quang nhóm bệnh nhân cấy implant có nâng xoang ghép xương. Tạp chí Y - Dược học quân sự. 2018; 1:146-150.
7. Fuh LJ, Huang HL, Chen CS, et al. Variations in bone density at dental implant sites in different regions of the jawbone. Oral Rehabil. 2010; 37(5):346-51
8. Turkyilmaz I, McGlumphy EA. Influence of bone density on implant stability parameters and implant success: a retrospective clinical study. BMC Oral Health. 2008; 8-23
9. Carl Misch. Bone physiology, Metabolism, and Biomechanics. Contemporary Implant Dentistry. 2008; 557-595.
10. Ladwein Catharina, Schmelzeisen Rainer, Katja Nelson, Tabea Viktoria Fluegge and Tobias Fretwurst. Is the presence of keratinized mucosa associated with periimplant tissue health? A clinical crosssectional analysis. International Journal of Implant Dentistry. 2015; 1 (11): 1 - 5
11. Amo Fernando Suárez - López del and Lin Guo-Hao. Influence of Soft Tissue Thickness Upon Peri-Implant Marginal Bone Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Periodontology. 2016; 87(6): 690 - 699
12. M. T. Kan J.Y., Rungcharassaeng K. Gingival biotype assessment in the esthetic zone: visual versus direct measurement. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2010; 30: 237–243.