Article Sidebar

PDF (Tiếng Việt)
Published: 2022-06-15
Abstract Views: 237
Views PDF (Tiếng Việt): 331
DOI: https://doi.org/10.52852/tcncyh.v155i7.762
Issue
Vol. 155 No. 7 (2022)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Hồng, V. T. T. ., Thảo, Đỗ L. P. ., & Phương, N. T. T. . (2022). 5. Jawbone’s indexes changes after treatment of class II division 1 malocclusion with four premolar extraction. Journal of Medical Research, 155(7), 26-33. https://doi.org/10.52852/tcncyh.v155i7.762

5. Jawbone's indexes changes after treatment of class II division 1 malocclusion with four premolar extraction

Vo Thi Thuy Hong, Do Le Phuong Thao, Nguyen Thi Thu Phuong

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study determined the change of the jawbone's indexes in the anterior-posterior, and vertical dimensions on Cephalometrics of class II division 1 malocclusion patients with extraction of four premolars. After treatment, SNA angle decreased by 0.15 ± 2.26o and the SNB angle increased by 0.15 ± 1.56o but there was no statistical significance. The indexes GoGn-SN, N-Me changed less than 1o, 1mm with no statistical significance. Thus, on analysis of Cephalometrics film, there was no change of the anterior-posterior and vertical dimensions of the maxillary and mandibular bones of the class II devision 1 malocclusion patients with extraction of four premolars.

Article Details

Keywords

class II division 1, extraction of premolars, cephalometrics

References

1. Drelich RC. A Cephalometric study of untreated Class II, division 1 malocclusion1. The Angle Orthodontist. 1948;18(3):70-75.
2. Vaden JL, Williams RA, Goforth RL. Class II correction: Extraction or nonextraction? American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2018;154(6):860-876.
3. Bowman SJ, Johnston LE. The esthetic impact of extraction and nonextraction treatments on Caucasian patients. Angle Orthod. 2000;70(1):3-10. doi:10.1043/0003-3219(2000)070<0003:TEIOEA>2.0.CO;2.
4. Guo Y, Han X, Xu H, Ai D, Zeng H, Bai D. Morphological characteristics influencing the orthodontic extraction strategies for Angle’s class II division 1 malocclusions. Progress in orthodontics. 2014;15(1):1-7.
5. Al-Nimri KS. Vertical changes in class II division 1 malocclusion after premolar extractions. The Angle Orthodontist. 2006;76(1): 52-58.
6. Hayashida H, Ioi H, Nakata S, Takahashi I, Counts AL. Effects of retraction of anterior teeth and initial soft tissue variables on lip changes in Japanese adults. The European Journal of Orthodontics. 2011;33(4):419-426.
7. Luppanapornlarp S, Johnston Jr LE. The effects of premolar-extraction: a long-term comparison of outcomes in "clear-cut" extraction and nonextraction Class II patients. The Angle Orthodontist. 1993;63(4):257-272.
8. Masella RS, Meister M. Current concepts in the biology of orthodontic tooth movement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;129(4):458-468. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.12.013.
9. Bishara SE, Cummins DM, Jakobsen JR, Zaher AR. Dentofacial and soft tissue changes in Class II, division 1 cases treated with and without extractions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995;107(1):28-37. doi: 10.1016/s0889 -5406(95)70154-0.
10. Bishara SE. Mandibular changes in persons with untreated and treated Class II division 1 malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;113(6):661-673. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(98)70227-6.
11. Bowbeer GR. The 6th key to facial beauty and TMJ health. Funct Orthod. 1987; 4(4):10-11.
12. Schudy FF. The control of vertical overbite in clinical orthodontics. Angle Orthod. 1968;38(1):19-39. doi:1043/0003-3219(1968)0 38<0019:TCOVOI>2.0.CO;2.
13. Sassouni V, Nanda S. Analysis of dentofacial vertical proportions. American Journal of Orthodontics. 1964;50(11):801-823. doi: 10.1 016/0002-9416(64)90039-9.
14. McLaughlin RP, Bennett JC, Trevisi HJ. Systemized Orthodontic Treatment Mechanics. Mosby; 2001.