Morphology and dimensions of the median and lateral lingual foramina in the mandible on CBCT images in middle-aged individuals aged 45 - 59 years old
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aimed to describe the dimensions, prevalence, distribution according to gender, location and the proportion of foramina with dimensions greater than 1mm of the median and lateral lingual foramina on CBCT images in middle-aged individuals (45 - 59 years old). A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted on 158 CBCT scans (87 males, 71 females), evaluating 247 median lingual foramina and 274 lateral lingual foramina. The results showed
that all subjects (100%) presented with at least one median lingual foramen, while lateral lingual foramina were observed in 71.52% of cases. The median lingual foramen was predominantly located above the genial tubercle (72.15%) whereas lateral lingual foramina were mainly distributed in the premolar and molar regions. All measured dimensions of both median and lateral lingual foramina were significantly greater in males than in females (p < 0.05). Most foramina measured ≤ 1 mm; however, a notable proportion exceeded 1mm, particularly among median lingual foramina. Lingual foramina are common anatomical structures with considerable variability in number, location, size and exhibit clear gender-related differences. CBCT should be considered in high-risk surgical cases or when anatomical variations are suspected to support more accurate, appropriate treatment planning and to reduce the risk of complications.
Article Details
Keywords
Median lingual foramen (MLF), Lateral lingual foramen (LLF), cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)
References
2. Padhye NM, et al. Three-dimensional assessment of the mandibular lingual foramina with implications for surgical and implant therapy: a multicentre cross-sectional study. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2023;13:186-90.
3. Trost M, et al. The lingual foramina, a potential risk in oral surgery. A retrospective analysis of location and anatomic variability. Ann Anat. 2020;231:151515.
4. Gilis S, et al. Mandibular incisive canal and lingual foramina characterization by cone-beam computed tomography. Morphologie. 2019;103:48-53.
5. Silvestri F, et al. Lingual foramina of the anterior mandible in edentulous patients: CBCT analysis and surgical risk assessment. Ann Anat. 2022;244:151982.
6. He X, et al. Assessment of the appearance, location and morphology of mandibular lingual foramina using cone beam computed tomography. Int Dent J. 2016;66:272-9.
7. Yildirim YD, et al. Evaluation of mandibular lingual foramina related to dental implant treatment with computerized tomography: a multicenter clinical study. Implant Dent. 2014;23:57-63.
8. Krishnan U, et al. A limited field cone-beam computed tomography–based evaluation of the mental foramen, accessory mental foramina, anterior loop, lateral lingual foramen, and lateral lingual canal. J Endod. 2018;44:946-51.
9. Kim DH, et al. Distribution of the lingual foramina in mandibular cortical bone in Koreans. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;39:263-8.
10. Wei X, et al. Detection and characterization of anterior loop, accessory mental foramen, and lateral lingual foramen by using cone beam computed tomography. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;124:365-71.
11. Shan S, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of mandibular canal variations on cone beam computed tomography. Oral Radiol. 2022;38(4):445-451.
12. Pavlovic ZR, et al. Anatomic variations important for dental implantation in the mandible: a systematic review. Diagnostics (Basel). 2025;15(2):181.
13. Moshfeghi M, et al. Lingual foramen of the mandible on cone-beam computed tomography scans: a study of anatomical variations in an Iranian population. Front Dent. 2021;18:20.
14. Abu-Ta’a MF, et al. The lingual foramen variations detected on cone beam computed tomography. Open Dent J. 2024;18:e18742106335128.
15. Mostafavi M, et al. Prevalence of accessory mental foramen and lateral lingual foramen using cone beam computed tomography: a single-center cross-sectional study. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024;28(4):1623-1633.