Article Sidebar

PDF (Tiếng Việt)
Published: 2023-01-31
Abstract Views: 225
Views PDF (Tiếng Việt): 360
DOI: https://doi.org/10.52852/tcncyh.v162i1.1348
Issue
Vol. 162 No. 1 (2023)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Trung Hiếu, P., Sỹ Quyền Năng, V. ., Tú Nam, V., Khoa Nguyên, P., Trung Dũng, T. ., & Đình Toàn, D. . (2023). 17. Evaluation of the early outcome of total hip replacement surgery using patient-specific instrument. Journal of Medical Research, 162(1), 147-156. https://doi.org/10.52852/tcncyh.v162i1.1348

17. Evaluation of the early outcome of total hip replacement surgery using patient-specific instrument

Pham Trung Hieu, Vo Sy Quyen Nang, Vu Tu Nam, Phan Khoa Nguyen, Tran Trung Dung, Duong Dinh Toan

Main Article Content

Abstract

The use of patient-specific instruments in total hip replacement surgery has been shown to help improve the accuracy of placement of implant components, thereby reducing complications and increasing the life expectancy of implants. This study evaluated the early results of 14 patients who had the primary unilateral total hip replacement surgery. The patients received computerized tomography (CT) scans before and after surgery to collect parameters for implant. Softwares for templating and 3D printing were used to orient the position of implant components during surgery. All cases had implant sizes matched with their preoperative measurements. The anteversion angle of the acetabulum component and leg length discrepancy were similar between expected and actual (p > 0.05). All the indices of the acetabulum and the stem component on the CT scan were in the safe range. The early clinical results were similar to those of other total hip replacement methods.

Article Details

Keywords

Total hip replacement, personalized surgery, 3D computed tomography, 3D printing

References

1. D’lima DD, Urquhart AG, Buehler KO, Walker RH, Colwell Jr CW. The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios. JBJS. 2000; 82(3): 315-321.
2. Wang Q, Xiao J, Zhu L, et al. Acetate templating on calibrated standing digital radiograph improves accuracy of preoperative templating for total hip arthroplasty. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research. 2017; 103(3): 341-347.
3. Lewinnek GE, Lewis J, Tarr R, Compere C, Zimmerman J. Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978; 60(2): 217-220.
4. Kaufman Kentou K. CEYSea. Biomechanics. Reconstructive surgery of the joint. 1996.
5. Lewinnek GE, Lewis J, Tarr R, Compere C, Zimmerman J. Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. The Journal of bone and joint surgery American volume. 1978; 60(2): 217-220.
6. Wu P, Liu Q, Fu M, et al. Value of computed tomography-based three-dimensional pre-operative planning in cup placement in total hip arthroplasty with dysplastic acetabulum. Journal of investigative surgery. 2018.
7. Wako Y, Nakamura J, Miura M, Kawarai Y, Sugano M, Nawata K. Interobserver and Intraobserver Reliability of Three-Dimensional Preoperative Planning Software in Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. Feb 2018; 33(2): 601-607. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2017.08.031
8. Osmani FA, Thakkar S, Ramme A, Elbuluk A, Wojack P, Vigdorchik JM. Variance in predicted cup size by 2-dimensional vs 3-dimensional computerized tomography-based templating in primary total hip arthroplasty. Arthroplast Today. Dec 2017; 3(4): 289-293. doi:10.1016/j.artd.2016.09.003.
9. Mainard D, Barbier O, Knafo Y, Belleville R, Mainard-Simard L, Gross JB. Accuracy and reproducibility of preoperative three-dimensional planning for total hip arthroplasty using biplanar low-dose radiographs: A pilot study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. Jun 2017; 103(4): 531-536. doi:10.1016/j.otsr.2017.03.001.
10. Hofmann AA, Skrzynski MC. Hip Arthroplasty: Headaches & Migraines: Leg-Length Inequality and Nerve Palsy in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Lawyer Awaits! Orthopedics. 2000; 23(9): 943-944.
11. Tanaka R, Shigematsu M, Motooka T, Mawatari M, Hotokebuchi T. Factors influencing the improvement of gait ability after total hip arthroplasty. The Journal of arthroplasty. 2010; 25(6): 982-985.
12. Mishra A, Verma T, Rajkumar, Agarwal G, Sharma A, Maini L. 3D Printed Patient-Specific Acetabular Jig for Cup Placement in Total Hip Arthroplasty. Indian J Orthop. Apr 2020; 54(2): 174-180. doi:10.1007/s43465-020-00061-2.
13. Hassani H, Cherix S, Ek ET, Rudiger HA. Comparisons of preoperative three-dimensional planning and surgical reconstruction in primary cementless total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. Jun 2014; 29(6): 1273-7. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2013.12.033.
14. Geijer M, Kiernan S, Sundberg M, Flivik G. Pre- and postoperative offset and femoral neck version measurements and validation using 3D computed tomography in total hip arthroplasty. Acta Radiol Open. Oct 2020; 9(10): 2058460120964911. doi:10.1177/2058460120964911.
15. Scheerlinck T, De Winter E, Sas A, Kolk S, Van Gompel G, Vandemeulebroucke J. Hip implants can restore anatomical and medialized rotation centres in most cases : a 3D templating study comparing four implantation strategies. Bone Jt Open. Jul 2021; 2(7): 476-485. doi:10.1302/2633-1462.27.BJO-2021-0065.R1.