1. The value of quantitative 3.0T MRI signal in diagnosing protate cancer

Nguyen Dinh Minh, Vu Ngoc Duong

Main Article Content

Abstract

This cross-sectional descriptive study based on quantitative signal intensity on 3-tesla magnetic resonance imaging (3.0T MRI) was conducted to differentiate prostate cancer (PCa) and non prostate cancer (NPCa) lesions. The study involved 84 patients (PTs) with PSA > 4 ng/ml who underwent 3.0T MRI and transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy with histopathological results from January to October 2023 at Viet Duc Hospital. The histopathological result was defined as PCa when Gleason score was ≥ 6. The location of PCa was determined based on anatomical zones corresponding to 2 regions on 3.0T MRI (peripheral or central zone). The results showed the mean age was 70.1 ± 7.65 years (ranging from 41 to 82 years), PCa group was 72.6 ± 6.6 years, and NPCa group was 67.7 ± 8.2 years (p < 0.01). Considering lesions in both peripheral and central zones, the signal intensity indices of PCa were consistently lower than the benign group on T2-weighted images (T2W mean), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC mean and ADC min), while indices on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI mean and DWI max) were higher (p < 0.01). Moreover, the ROC curve demonstrated that ADC mean was the most accurate in diagnosing PCa with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.948, sensitivity (Sn) of 92.3%, and specificity (Sp) of 86.7% in the peripheral zone and AUC of 0.991 in the central zone with Sn 97.4% and Sn 86.7%. Additionally, ADC min, T2 mean, DWI mean, DWI max also had high diagnostic value in detecting PCa.

Article Details

References

1. Perez IM, Jambor I, Kauko T, et al. Qualitative and Quantitative Reporting of a Unique Biparametric MRI: Towards Biparametric MRI-Based Nomograms for Prediction of Prostate Biopsy Outcome in Men With a Clinical Suspicion of Prostate Cancer (IMPROD and MULTI-IMPROD Trials). Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2020;51(5):1556-1567. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.26975
2. Lâm Nhân Hậu, Trần Ngọc Dung, Lê Chí Dũng. Đánh giá kết quả bước đầu giá trị mật độ PSA, tỷ lệ PSA tự do, tỷ lệ p2PSA và phi trong chẩn đoán ung thư tuyến tiền liệt ở bệnh nhân có u tuyến tiền liệt. Tạp chí Y Dược học Cần Thơ. 2023;(27):79-85.
3. Nishida S, Kinoshita H, Mishima T, et al. Prostate cancer detection by prebiopsy 3.0-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Urol. 2011;18(9):653-8. doi:10.1111/j.1442-204 2.2011.02814.x
4. Virarkar M, Szklaruk J, Diab R, et al. Diagnostic value of 3.0 T versus 1.5 T MRI in staging prostate cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Pol J Radiol. 2022;87:e421-e429. doi:10.5114/pjr.2022.118685
5. Park SB. Quantitative relaxation maps from synthetic MRI for prostate cancer. Acta Radiol. 2022;63(7):982-983. doi:10.1177/02841851221077405
6. Andrei SP, Andrew BR, Ismail BT, et al. RadioGraphics Update: PI-RADS Version 2.1 - A Pictorial Update. RadioGraphics. 2020;40(7):E33-E37. doi:10.1148/rg.20201902 07
7. Schieda N, Lim CS, Zabihollahy F, et al. Quantitative Prostate MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2021;53(6):1632-1645. doi:10.1002/jmri.27191
8. Lee Chau Hung. Quantitative T2-mapping using MRI for detection of prostate malignancy: a systematic review of the literature. Acta Radiologica. 2019;60(9):1181-1189. doi:10.1177/0284185118820058
9. Rosenkrantz AB, Kim S, Campbell N, et al. Transition zone prostate cancer: revisiting the role of multiparametric MRI at 3 T. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015;204(3):W266-72. doi:10.2214/ajr.14.12955
10. Lucarelli NM, Villanova I, Maggialetti N, et al. Quantitative ADC: An Additional Tool in the Evaluation of Prostate Cancer? J Pers Med. 15 2023;13(9)doi:10.3390/jpm13091378
11. Nguyễn Văn Khôi, Lê Văn Phước, Trịnh Lê Hồng Minh. Giá trị cộng hưởng từ khuếch tán trong chẩn đoán ung thư tuyến tiền liệt. Tạp chí Điện quang và Y học hạt nhân Việt Nam. 2022;(23):38-42. doi:10.55046/vjrnm.23. 434.2016