Factors related to depression of hospital staff direct care of COVID-19 patients

Bui Thanh Thuy1, Tran Thi Len2, Nguyen Kim Thu3, Tran Tho Nhi3, Do Tuyet Mai4, Pham Anh Tung1, Tran Thi Thanh Huong3
1 National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology
2 National hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology
3 Hanoi Medical University
4 National cancer hospital

Main Article Content

Abstract

Vietnam had been recognized as a country that has successfully controlled COVID-19 pandemic, especially during the first wave. However, for health workers who directly care and treat COVID patients, this is really a challenging job. The cross-sectional study was conducted on 400 medical staff working at the National Hospital of Tropical Diseases and Ninh Binh General Hospital to described prevalence and factors related to depression of healthcare workers by using the DASS 21 scale. The results showed that the depression rate among healthcare workers is 14.8%. Factors that were statistically significantly associated with depression include: work location, work department, working time, appearance of physical symptoms, having a relative infected with COVID-19 and support/stigmatization factors. From this results, we need to find solutions to reduce the stress of health workers participating in the prevention of the COVID-19 epidemic.

Article Details

Author Biographies

Nguyen Kim Thu, Hanoi Medical University

Trưởng bộ môn Truyền nhiễm - Trường Đại học Y Hà Nội

Tran Tho Nhi, Hanoi Medical University

Phó Trưởng bộ môn Y đức - Tâm lý học, Viện Đào tạo YHDP&YTCC, Trường Đại học Y Hà Nội

Do Tuyet Mai, National cancer hospital

Khoa điều trị A - Bệnh viện K

Tran Thi Thanh Huong, Hanoi Medical University

Trưởng bộ môn Y đức và Tâm lý học - Trường Đại học Y Hà Nội,

Phó Viện trưởng Viện Ung thư quốc gia

References

WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard. Accessed May 23, 2021. https://covid19.who.int
2. Chew NWS, Lee GKH, Tan BYQ, et al. A multinational, multicentre study on the psychological outcomes and associated physical symptoms amongst healthcare workers during COVID-19 outbreak. Brain Behav Immun. 2020;88:559-565. doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2020.04.049
3. Lai J, Ma S, Wang Y, et al. Factors Associated With Mental Health Outcomes Among Health Care Workers Exposed to Coronavirus Disease 2019. JAMA Network Open. 2020;3(3). doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3976
4. Huang Y, Zhao N. Generalized anxiety disorder, depressive symptoms and sleep quality during COVID-19 outbreak in China: a web-based cross-sectional survey. Psychiatry Res. 2020;288:112954. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112954
5. Ng BH, Nuratiqah NA, Faisal AH, et al. A descriptive study of the psychological experience of health care workers in close contact with a person with COVID-19. Med J Malaysia. 2020;75(5):485-489.
6. Alshekaili M, Hassan W, Al Said N, et al. Factors associated with mental health outcomes across healthcare settings in Oman during COVID-19: frontline versus non-frontline healthcare workers. BMJ Open. 2020;10(10). doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042030
7. Tran TD, Tran T, Fisher J. Validation of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS) 21 as a screening instrument for depression and anxiety in a rural community-based cohort of northern Vietnamese women. BMC Psychiatry. 2013;13:24. doi:10.1186/1471-244X-13-24
8. Mental health in Viet Nam. Accessed May 24, 2021. https://www.who.int/westernpacific/health-topics/mental-health
9. Si M-Y, Su X-Y, Jiang Y, et al. Psychological impact of COVID-19 on medical care workers in China. Infect Dis Poverty. 2020;9. doi:10.1186/s40249-020-00724-0
10. Liao L, Wang B, Li X, et al. Psychological Effects of COVID-19 on Hospital Staff: A National Cross-Sectional Survey of China Mainland. SSRN Electronic Journal. Published online January 1, 2020. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3550050
11. Matua GA, Wal DMV der. Living Under the Constant Threat of Ebola: A Phenomenological Study of Survivors and Family Caregivers During an Ebola Outbreak. J Nurs Res. 2015;23(3):217-224. doi:10.1097/jnr.0000000000000116
12. Zhu Z, Xu S, Wang H, et al. COVID-19 in Wuhan: Immediate Psychological Impact on 5062 Health Workers. medRxiv. Published online March 16, 2020:2020.02.20.20025338. doi:10.1101/2020.02.20.20025338