75. Characteristics of clinical teaching methods in the innovation of medical doctor program at Hanoi Medical University
Main Article Content
Abstract
The study was conducted with 258 lecturers from modules of phase 3 of the Medical Doctor Program at Hanoi Medical University. The CBA, OMP, and FS methods were designed with the requirement that lecturers prepare lectures with smart objectives (CBA: 95.74%; OMP: 96.84%; FS: 98.09%). During the lectures, students were given many opportunities to approach and analyze patient problems (94.18%; 98.10%; 98.09%). Lecturers spent time discussing, asking questions, and giving feedback to students (95.35%; 97.47%; 98.09%); Three methods helped students apply knowledge, clinical reasoning, work in groups, and develop professionalism (95.73%; 97.46%; 98.09%). Students enjoyed lectures (95.35%; 96.84%, 98.09%). Three new clinical teaching methods applied at Hanoi Medical University with appropriate design have created many opportunities for learning and practicing based on evidence for medical students. Students are encouraged to actively apply knowledge into practice, clinical reasoning and practice professionalism.
Article Details
Keywords
Innovation of medical doctor training program, clinical teaching with short case (OMP), clinical teaching with long case (FS), case study analysis (CBA), medical teaching methods, faculties’ development
References
2. Trường Đại học Y Hà Nội. QĐ 6078/QĐ-ĐHYHN ngày 31/12/2021 Phê duyệt các phương pháp dạy học áp dụng trong các chương trình đào tạo đổi mới dựa trên năng lực tại Trường Đại học Y Hà Nội. 2021
3. Neher J.O, Gordon K.C. Meyer B. et al. A five-step “Microskills” model of clinical teaching. J Am Board Fam Pract. 1992; 5: 419-24
4. Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary. Five steps to effective teaching at the bedside, Website: http://www.ucalgary.ca/OFD
5. Phạm Thị Minh Đức. Phương pháp dạy-học lâm sàng. Xuất bản lần thứ 2. 2025. NXB Y học, 200 trang.
6. Cox K. Planning bedside teaching. Medical journal of Australia. 1993; 158: 493-495.
7. Dawes M, Summerskill W, Glasziou P, et al. Sicily statement on evidence-based practice. BMC Medical Education. 2005; 5: 1 doi:10.1186/1472-6920-5-1.
8. McLean SF. Case-based learning and its application in medical and health care fields: a review of worldwide literature. Journal of Medical education and curricula development. 2016; 3: 39-49.
9. Baker E, Ledford C, Liston B. Teaching, Evaluating, and Remediating Clinical Reasoning. Academic Internal Medicine Insight | 2010 | 8:1
10. Challa KT, Sayed A, Acharya Y. Modern techniques of teaching and learning in medical education: a descriptive literature review. MedEdPublish. 2021. https://doi.org/10.15694/mep.2021.000018.1.
11. Trường Đại học Y Hà Nội. QĐ số 3490/QĐ-ĐHYHN ngày 14/9/2022 Ban hành tài liệu Hướng dẫn giảng viên và sinh viên phương pháp dạy học áp dụng tại Trường Đại học Y Hà Nội. 2022.
12. Rubisch HPK, Berberat PO, Fuetterer C et al. Student mistakes and teacher reactions in bedside teaching. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 2023; 28: 1523-1556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-023-10233-y.
13. Rucker L, Rucker G, Nguyen A, et al. Medical faculty and medical student opinion on the utility of questions to teach and evaluate in the clinical enviroment. Medical Science educator. 2023; 33: 669-678.