56. Characteristics of sem method and group work ability of medical students
Main Article Content
Abstract
The study was conducted with 1376 medical students (1st year, 2nd year, 3rd year) of Hanoi Medical University. SEM sessions had good learning objectives and students were assigned tasks in groups (Y1: 79.78%; Y2: 84.46%; Y3: 82.04%). Students researched documents, discussed in groups and created group products together (79.78%; 84.90%; 81.38%). The group used the LMS system well to read documents and submit assignments (79.56%; 82.98%; 80.92%). Students actively commented and posed questions to the groups (75.39%; 78.72%; 75.83%); developed communication skills, teamwork and reporting results (80.22%; 84.89%; 83.37%). The rich results from the groups helped students better understand the lesson and the lecture became more interesting (78.46%; 81.27%; 79.16%). The SEM method encouraged students to research the material and cooperate well in groups to complete the common task. The group products were well presented, giving students the opportunity to debate, understand the lesson more deeply, enriching the learning experience, developing capacity and professionalism.
Article Details
Keywords
Innovation of medical doctor training program, seminar (SEM), teaching methods in medicine, faculty development
References
2.Hazavehei SMM, Taghdisi MH, Mohaddes. The effects of three teaching methods of lecture, training game and role playing on knowledge and practice of middle school girls in regard to puberty nutrition. J Med Edu Dev of Kerman Uni of Med Sci. 2006;2:26-33.
3.Babu KA, Babu VPVSS, Bhagyalakshmi A, et al. A evaluation of the effectiveness of seminar as an educational tool among the medical post graduate students. Int J Res Med Sci. 2016;4(3):877-800.
4.Brunton PA, Morrow LA, Hoad-Reddick G, et al. Students’ perceptions of seminar and lecture based teaching in restorative dentistry. Eur J dent educ. 2000;0(3-4):108.
5. Trường Đại học Y Hà Nội. Quyết định số 3490/QĐ-ĐHYHN ngày 14/9/2022 Ban hành tài liệu Hướng dẫn giảng viên và sinh viên phương pháp dạy học áp dụng tại Trường Đại học Y Hà Nội. 2022
6. Yorke DM, Goodwin AJ. The student‐led seminar: opening rather an endgame?. Journal of In-Service Education. 1985;11(3):153-155. DOI: 10.1080/0305763850110307
7. Gomathi KG, Shaafie IA, Venkatramana M. Student-Led Seminars as a teaching learning method- effectiveness of a modified format. South East Asian Journal of Medical Education. 2014;8(182-84).
8. Devi K. Seminar as a method of teaching community medicine to under graduate medical students. International Journal of Medical and Health Research Volume 3. 2017;107AD;34:163-167.
9. Lee AC, Gooding HC, Stoddard HAA. Case study of curriculim co-creation during a seminar-style course for senior medical students. BMC Medical education. 2023;33:1481-1486.
10. Verma A, Patyal A, Meena JK, et al. Interactive teaching in medical education: Experiences and barriers. Adesh University Journal of Medical Sciences & Research • Article in Press, DOI 10.25259/AUJMSR_13_2021
11. Harden RM, Laidlaw JM. Be FAIR to your learners. Essential skills for a medical teacher (2nd edition). Elsevier. 2017.
12. Aggarwal N, Verma N, Singh H. Student-led seminar as a teaching learning technique to introduce first year medical undergraduate students to self-directed learning. Journal of Education Technology in Health Sciences. 2021;8(2):59-63.