The result of stenting for extracranial carotid stenosis at Hanoi Medical University Hospital
Main Article Content
Abstract
Carotid artery stenting is a minimally invasive method with a high success rate and low complications. 78 patients were included in the study to evaluate the results of stenting for extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis at Hanoi Medical University Hospital from January 2022 to August 2025. The results revealed that 85.9% were male, the average age was 70 years old, 64.1% had symptomatic carotid stenosis, 78.2% had severe carotid stenosis on percutaneous transluminal carotid angiography. All procedures were successful, the major ischemic stroke rate was 1.3%, the hemorrhage rate was 1.3%, and the new event rate within 30 days was 0%. Extracranial carotid artery stenting is a relatively safe, minimally invasive, and effective procedure with a low complication rate.
Article Details
Keywords
Internal carotid artery stenosis, stroke, carotid artery stenting (CAS)
References
2. Lui F, Khan Suheb MZ, Patti L. Ischemic Stroke. In: StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; 2025. Accessed October 12, 2025. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK499997/
3. Ismail A, Ravipati S, Gonzalez-Hernandez D, et al. Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Look Into the Diagnostic and Management Strategies, and Related Complications. Cureus. 15(5):e38794. doi:10.7759/cureus.38794
4. Kleindorfer DO, Towfighi A, Chaturvedi S, et al. 2021 Guideline for the Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2021;52(7):e364-e467. doi:10.1161/STR.0000000000000375
5. Brott TG, Hobson RW, Howard G, et al. Stenting versus Endarterectomy for Treatment of Carotid-Artery Stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(1):11-23. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0912321
6. Kang BM, Yoon SM, Oh JS, et al. Long-term outcomes of carotid artery stenting in patients with carotid artery stenosis: A single-center 14-year retrospective analysis. J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg. 2023;25(2):160-174. doi:10.7461/jcen.2023.E2022.07.007
7. Bonati LH, Dobson J, Featherstone RL, et al. Long-term outcomes after stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of symptomatic carotid stenosis: the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS) randomised trial. The Lancet. 2015;385(9967):529-538. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61184-3
8. Skowronska M, Piorkowska A, Czlonkowska A. Differences in carotid artery atherosclerosis between men and women in the early phase after ischemic event. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2018;52(2):162-167. doi:10.1016/j.pjnns.2017.09.002
9. Nguyễn Lưu Giang, Lê Thanh Hùng, Trần Chí Cường, và cs. Đánh giá kết quả điều trị hẹp động mạch cảnh trong đoạn ngoài sọ bằng can thiệp nong và đặt stent tại bệnh viện đa khoa quốc tế sis cần thơ. Tạp Chí Dược Học Cần Thơ. 2022;(53):90-97. doi:10.58490/ctump.2022i53.194
10. Bùi Văn Dũng, Võ Hồng Khôi, Trịnh Tiến Lực, và cs. Kết quả điều trị hẹp động mạch cảnh trong đoạn ngoài sọ bằng đặt stent ở người bệnh nhồi máu não cấp tại Bệnh viện Hữu nghị Việt Tiệp. Tạp Chí Học Việt Nam. 2025; 553(2). doi:10.51298/vmj.v553i2.15428.
11. Noori VJ, Eldrup-Jørgensen J. A systematic review of vascular closure devices for femoral artery puncture sites. J Vasc Surg. 2018;68(3):887-899. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2018.05.019
12. Gorgulu S, Sahin M, Norgaz NT, et al. Carotid artery stenting without embolic protection: A randomized multicenter trial (the CASWEP trial). Interv Neuroradiol. 2023;29(4):419-425. doi:10.1177/15910199221094388