Predictive value of the P-POSSUM score for postoperative pneumonia in abdominal surgery

Nguyen Minh Tue, Le Dai Minh, Nguyen Toan Thang

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: To determine the incidence of postoperative pneumonia after abdominal surgery and to evaluate the predictive value of the P-POSSUM score for this complication. Subjects and methods: This prospective observational cohort study included 503 patients undergoing abdominal surgery at Bach Mai Hospital from December 2025 to March 2026. The primary outcome was postoperative pneumonia within 30 days. Predictive performance of the P-POSSUM score was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), the Youden index-derived cut-off, and multivariable logistic regression. Results: The incidence of postoperative pneumonia was 8.5%. The P-POSSUM score showed good discriminatory ability, with an AUROC of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.76 – 0.90). The optimal cut-off was 34.5, yielding a sensitivity of 81% and a specificity of 77%. In multivariable analysis, a P-POSSUM score > 34.5 was independently associated with postoperative pneumonia (OR = 13.67; 95% CI: 6.10 – 30.64). Underweight status was also significantly associated with the outcome. Conclusion: The P-POSSUM score demonstrated good value for risk stratification of postoperative pneumonia after abdominal surgery and may support early identification of high-risk patients.

Article Details

References

1. Massarweh NN, Legner VJ, Symons RG, McCormick WC, Flum DR. Impact of advancing age on abdominal surgical outcomes. Arch Surg. Chic Ill 1960. 2009;144(12):1108-1114. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2009.204
2. Xiang B, Jiao S, Si Y, Yao Y, Yuan F, Chen R. Risk Factors for Postoperative Pneumonia: A Case-Control Study. Front Public Health. 2022;10:913897. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2022.913897
3. Bilimoria KY, Liu Y, Paruch JL, et al. Development and Evaluation of the Universal ACS NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator: A Decision Aide and Informed Consent Tool for Patients and Surgeons. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217(5):833-842.e3. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.07.385
4. Protopapa KL, Simpson JC, Smith NCE, Moonesinghe SR. Development and validation of the Surgical Outcome Risk Tool (SORT). Br J Surg. 2014;101(13):1774-1783. doi:10.1002/bjs.9638
5. Prytherch DR, Whiteley MS, Higgins B, Weaver PC, Prout WG, Powell SJ. POSSUM and Portsmouth POSSUM for predicting mortality. Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity. Br J Surg. 1998;85(9):1217-1220. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00840.x
6. Yii MK, Ng KJ. Risk-adjusted surgical audit with the POSSUM scoring system in a developing country. Br J Surg. 2002;89(1):110-113. doi:10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01979.x
7. Shekar N, Debata P, Debata I, Nair P, Rao LS, Shekar P. Use of POSSUM (Physiologic and Operative Severity Score for the Study of Mortality and Morbidity) and Portsmouth-POSSUM for Surgical Assessment in Patients Undergoing Emergency Abdominal Surgeries. Cureus. 15(6):e40850. doi:10.7759/cureus.40850
8. Copeland GP, Jones D, Walters M. POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit. Br J Surg. 1991;78(3):355-360. doi:10.1002/bjs.1800780327
9. Chughtai M, Gwam CU, Mohamed N, et al. The Epidemiology and Risk Factors for Postoperative Pneumonia. J Clin Med Res. 2017;9(6):466-475. doi:10.14740/jocmr3002w
10. STARSurg Collaborative and TASMAN Collaborative. Evaluation of prognostic risk models for postoperative pulmonary complications in adult patients undergoing major abdominal surgery: a systematic review and international external validation cohort study. Lancet Digit Health. 2022;4(7):e520-e531. doi:10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00069-3
11. World Health Organization: The Asia-Pacific perspective: Redefining Obesity and Its Treatment. 2000. Accessed March 25, 2026.
12. Jammer I, Wickboldt N, Sander M, et al. Standards for definitions and use of outcome measures for clinical effectiveness research in perioperative medicine: European Perioperative Clinical Outcome (EPCO) definitions: a statement from the ESA-ESICM joint taskforce on perioperative outcome measures. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015;32(2):88-105. doi:10.1097/EJA.0000000000000118
13. González-Martínez S, Martín-Baranera M, Martí-Saurí I, Borrell-Grau N, Pueyo-Zurdo JM. Comparison of the risk prediction systems POSSUM and P-POSSUM with the Surgical Risk Scale: A prospective cohort study of 721 patients. Int J Surg Lond Engl. 2016;29:19-24. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.03.005
14. Collins GS, Reitsma JB, Altman DG, Moons KGM. Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement. BMJ. 2015;350:g7594. doi:10.1136/bmj.g7594