Article Sidebar

PDF (Tiếng Việt)
Published: 2026-08-04
Abstract Views: 0
Views PDF (Tiếng Việt): 0
DOI: https://doi.org/10.52852/tcncyh.v204i7.5654
Issue
Vol. 204 No. 7 (2026)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Hoàng, N. V., Thắng, C. C., Linh, P. T., & Giang, N. T. (2026). Outcomes of Hysteroscopic Surgery for Intrauterine Adhesions at the National Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Journal of Medical Research, 204(7), 839-847. https://doi.org/10.52852/tcncyh.v204i7.5654

Outcomes of Hysteroscopic Surgery for Intrauterine Adhesions at the National Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Nguyen Van Hoang, Cu Chien Thang, Pham Tuan Linh, Nguyen Thai Giang

Main Article Content

Abstract

The study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of hysteroscopic surgery for the treatment of intrauterine adhesions at the National Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology from January 2024 to December 2025. A retrospective descriptive study was conducted on 96 patients diagnosed with intrauterine adhesions and treated with hysteroscopic surgery. 43.8% of patients are within the 35 – 39-years old age group. Complete adhesiolysis represented 83.3%, while 16.7% of cases underwent partial adhesiolysis. Only one case of intraoperative uterine perforation was recorded, and no other serious complications were observed. After 3 months of follow-up, 68.8% of patients showed improvement in menstruation. Post-treatment hysterosalpingography demonstrated a marked improvement in uterine cavity morphology, with 61.5% of cases returning to normal and the percentage of severe intrauterine adhesions decreasing to 3.1%. After a mean follow-up period of 7 months, the pregnancy rate was 29.2%. The study results showed that hysteroscopic adhesiolysis is an effective and safe treatment for intrauterine adhesions, contributing to the restoration of uterine cavity anatomy, improvement of menstrual function, and enhancement of fertility potential in affected patients.

Article Details

Keywords

Intrauterine adhesions, Asherman syndrome, hysteroscopy, infertility, adhesiolysis

References

1. Asherman JG. Amenorrhoea Traumatica (Atretica). BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 1948; 55(1): 23-30. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1948.tb07045.x.
2. Hooker AB, Lemmers M, Thurkow AL, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of intrauterine adhesions after miscarriage: Prevalence, risk factors and long-term reproductive outcome. Human Reproduction Update. 2014; 20(2): 262-278. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmt045.
3. AAGL Elevating Gynecologic Surgery. AAGL practice report: practice guidelines on intrauterine adhesions developed in collaboration with the European Society of Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE). Gynecol Surg. 2017; 14(1): 6. doi:10.1186/s10397-017-1007-3.
4. Hooker AB, de Leeuw RA, Emanuel MH, Mijatovic V, Brolmann HAM, Huirne JAF. The link between intrauterine adhesions and impaired reproductive performance: a systematic review of the literature. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022; 22: 837. doi:10.1186/s12884-022-05164-2.
5. Dave A, Drizi A, Manchanda R. Diagnostic hysteroscopy in intrauterine adhesions. TheTrocar. 2023; 4(1): 105-119. doi:10.36205/trocar1.2023011.
6. March CM. Management of Asherman’s syndrome. Reprod Biomed Online. 2011; 23(1): 63-76. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.11.018.
7. Thị Anh Đào L, Biên Thùy N, Ngọc Minh N. Nhận xét kết quả điều trị soi buồng tử cung tách dính tại Bệnh viện Phụ sản Hà Nội năm 2020. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam. 2022; 510(2). doi:10.51298/vmj.v510i2.1990.
8. Valle RF, Sciarra JJ. Intrauterine adhesions: Hysteroscopic diagnosis, classification, treatment, and reproductive outcome. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 1988; 158(6): 1459-1470. doi:10.5555/uri:pii:0002937888903821.
9. Yu D, Wong YM, Cheong Y, Xia E, Li TC. Asherman syndrome-one century later. Fertility and Sterility. 2008; 89(4): 759-779. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.02.096.
10. Barel O, Krakov A, Pansky M, Vaknin Z, Halperin R, Smorgick N. Intrauterine adhesions after hysteroscopic treatment for retained products of conception: what are the risk factors? Fertility and Sterility. 2015; 103(3): 775-779. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.11.016.
11. Yang JH, Chen CD, Chen SU, Yang YS, Chen MJ. The influence of the location and extent of intrauterine adhesions on recurrence after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis. BJOG. 2016; 123(4): 618-623. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.13353.
12. Soares SR, dos Reis MMBB, Camargos AF. Diagnostic accuracy of sonohysterography, transvaginal sonography, and hysterosalpingography in patients with uterine cavity diseases. Fertility and Sterility. 2000; 73(2): 406-411. doi:10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00532-4.
13. Roy KK, Baruah J, Sharma JB, Kumar S, Kachawa G, Singh N. Reproductive outcome following hysteroscopic adhesiolysis in patients with infertility due to Asherman’s syndrome. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2010; 281(2): 355-361. doi:10.1007/s00404-009-1117-x.
14. Di Spiezio Sardo A, Calagna G, Santangelo F, et al. The Role of Hysteroscopy in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Adenomyosis. Biomed Res Int. 2017; 2017: 2518396. doi:10.1155/2017/2518396.