Maxillary and mandibular transverse dental arch widths based on the Yonsei index on CBCT in patients with skeletal class III malocclusion

Nguyen Thanh Huyen, Nguyen Huong Ly, Dao Thi Dung, Vu Thi Thu Trang

Main Article Content

Abstract

This retrospective cross-sectional descriptive study aimed to evaluate the transverse relationship between the maxillary and mandibular dental arches in orthodontically untreated patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Maxillary arch width at the first molar region (AWU6), mandibular arch width at the first molar region (AWL6), and the AWU6–AWL6 discrepancy were measured according to the Yonsei index. These parameters were analyzed by gender and age group. The mean AWU6 was 47.09 ± 2.36 mm, the mean AWL6 was 50.15 ± 1.99 mm, and the mean AWU6–AWL6 discrepancy was −3.05 ± 2.07 mm. A negative AWU6–AWL6 discrepancy was observed in 79 patients (97.5%). The under-15 year old age group showed the greatest negative discrepancy (−4.00 ± 2.13 mm), while the discrepancy was less negative in the 15–18-year old and over-18-year old age groups. Orthodontically untreated patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion tended to show a transverse maxillomandibular discrepancy at the first molar region.

Article Details

References

1. Proffit WR, Fields HW, Larson BE, Sarver DM. Contemporary Orthodontics. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2019.
2. Ngan P, Moon W. Evolution of Class III treatment in orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015;148(1):22-36. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.04.012.
3. Guyer EC, Ellis EE, McNamara JA Jr, Behrents RG. Components of Class III malocclusion in juveniles and adolescents. Angle Orthod. 1986;56(1):7-30.
4. McNamara JA Jr. Maxillary transverse deficiency. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000;117(5):567-570. doi:10.1016/S0889-5406(00)70202-2.
5. Koo YJ, Choi SH, Keum BT, Yu HS, Hwang CJ, Melsen B, Lee KJ. Maxillomandibular arch width differences at estimated centers of resistance: comparison between normal occlusion and skeletal Class III malocclusion. Korean J Orthod. 2017;47(3):167-175. doi:10.4041/kjod.2017.47.3.167.
6. Zhang CX, Tan XM, Wu W, Liu H, Liu Y, Qu XR, Liu DX. Reliability of 2 methods in maxillary transverse deficiency diagnosis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2021;159(6):758-765. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.02.019.
7. Ahn J, Kim SJ, Lee JY, Chung CJ, Kim KH. Transverse dental compensation in relation to sagittal and transverse skeletal discrepancies in skeletal Class III patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017;151(1):148-156. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.06.031.
8. Zhang C, Guo Q, Liu W, Tang Y, Yuan R. Maxillary transverse deficiency diagnosed by 3 methods and its relationship with molar angulation in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2023;164(1):5-13. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2022.09.015.
9. Liu F, Huang H, Shi X, Liu Y, Liu D. A study of transverse maxillomandibular discrepancy and dental compensation in early mixed dentition with skeletal Class III malocclusion without posterior crossbite. PLoS One. 2023;18(6):e0287343. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0287343.
10. Ye G, Li Q, Guo Z, Yu X, Xu Y, Ding W, et al. Comparative evaluation of transverse width indices for diagnosing maxillary transverse deficiency. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24:808. doi:10.1186/s12903-024-04580-4.