Surgical treatment of peripheral vascular complications on the puncture site after percutaneous cardiovascular intervention
Main Article Content
Abstract
Cardiovascular interventions are becoming increasingly well-developed and widely applied in
clinical practice to treat many pathologies such as coronary heart disease, aortic disease, heart
valve disease, and trauma. Accompanying this development are vascular complications in the
vascular puncture site; however, there is little known about this complication in Vietnam. In 15
cases of vascular complications after percutaneous cardiovascular intervention, post-vascular
damage morphology included pseudo-aneurysm (60.0%), arterio-venous fistula (20.0%), arterial
injury (13.3%), and peritoneal hematoma (6.7%). The injury sites were observed at the femoral
artery (66.7%), the radial artery (20.0%), and the brachial artery (13.3%). Most patients underwent
surgery to remove pseudo-aneurysm, hematoma, and suture the lateral wound with good results.
Article Details
Keywords
Peripheral vascular injury surgery, cardiovascular intervention, arterial wound, arteriovenous aneurysm, arteriovenous shunt, retroperitoneal hematoma
References
2. Windecker S, Kolh P, Alfonso F, et al. 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur Heart J. Oct 1 2014;35(37):2541-619. doi: https://10.1093/eurheartj/ehu278.
3. Filis K, Arhontovasilis F, Theodorou D, et al. Management of early and late detected vascular complications following femoral arterial puncture for cardiac catheterization. Hellenic J Cardiol. 2007;48(3):134-42.
4. Nguyễn Thị Hoài Thu, Nguyễn Thị Minh Lý, Trần Hồng Quân, et al. Tỷ lệ biến chứng vết thương chọc mạch sau chụp và can thiệp động mạch vành và các yếu tố liên quan tại Bệnh viện Đại học Y Hà Nội. Tạp chí Nghiên cứu y học. 2021;138(2):124-131. doi: https://doi .org/10.52852/tcncyh.v138i2.83.
5. Trương Quang Bình. Khảo sát biến chứng mạch máu tại chõ của thủ thuật chụp và can thiệp động mạch vành. Tạp chí Y học Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh. 2004;8(1):50-54.
6. Komócsi A, Aradi D, Kehl D, et al. Meta-analysis of randomized trials on access site selection for percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Arch Med Sci. May 12 2014;10(2):203-12. doi: http://10.5114/aoms.2014.42570.
7. Tewari S, Sharma N, Kapoor A, et al. Comparison of transradial and transfemoral artery approach for percutaneous coronary angiography and angioplasty: a retrospective seven-year experience from a north Indian center. Indian Heart J. 2013;65(4):378-387. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2013.06.020.
8. Brancheau D, Jain SKA, Alexander PB. Same-day dual radial artery puncture examination in patients requiring percutaneous coronary intervention and the incidence of radial artery occlusion. Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease. 2018;12(3):77-84. doi: http://10.1177/1753944717749738.
9. Messina LM, Brothers TE, Wakefield TW, et al. Clinical characteristics and surgical management of vascular complications in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization: interventional versus diagnostic procedures. Journal of vascular surgery. 1991;13(5):593-600. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0741-5214(91) 90341-Q.
10. Muller DW, Shamir KJ, Ellis SG, Topol EJ. Peripheral vascular complications after conventional and complex percutaneous coronary interventional procedures. The American journal of cardiology. 1992;69(1):63-68. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(92) 90677-Q.