Article Sidebar

PDF (Tiếng Việt)
Published: 2022-03-01
Abstract Views: 226
Views PDF (Tiếng Việt): 577
DOI: https://doi.org/10.52852/tcncyh.v151i3.626
Issue
Vol. 151 No. 3 (2022)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Quang, L. H. ., & Huy, N. C. . (2022). Breast volume assessment: comparing two measurement methods at K Hospital. Journal of Medical Research, 151(3), 137-143. https://doi.org/10.52852/tcncyh.v151i3.626

Breast volume assessment: comparing two measurement methods at K Hospital

Le Hong Quang, Nguyen Cong Huy

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study compared the accuracy of measurements of breast volume obtained from anatomical
measurements and mammography. A total of 240 women treated at K Hospital, aged 18 to 78 years
old, were recruited to participate in the study. These women had their breast sizes measured using
a ruler based on anatomical landmarks, and breast volumes were calculated based on dimensions
measured on mammography. The average volume of all breast specimens was 372.6 ± 151.2ml. The
average volume measured by anatomical and mammographic methods are 395.3 ± 180.7ml and 397.1
± 170.3ml, respectively. The mammographic method has a higher accuracy (r = 0.905) than anatomical
measurement (r = 0.875), although both anatomical measurement and mammography show high
accuracy. These two methods are simple and can be applied routinely in breast surgery in Vietnam.

Article Details

Keywords

breast volume, breast measurement methods

References

1. Cochrane RA, Valasiadou P, Wilson AR, Al-Ghazal SK, Macmillan RD. Cosmesis and satisfaction after breast-conserving surgery correlates with the percentage of breast volume excised. Br J Surg. Dec 2003;90(12):1505-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4344.
2. Bertozzi N, Pesce M, Santi PL. Oncoplastic breast surgery: comprehensive review. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. Jun 2017;21(11):2572-2585.
3. Sigurdson LJ, Kirkland SA. Breast volume determination in breast hypertrophy: an accurate method using two anthropomorphic measurements. Plast Reconstr Surg. Aug 2006;118(2):313-20. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.00002 27627.75771.5c.
4. Pechter EA. A new method for determining bra size and predicting postaugmentation breast size. Plast Reconstr Surg. Sep 1998;102(4):1259-65. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199809040-00056.
5. Kayar R, Civelek S, Cobanoglu M. Five methods of breast volume measurement: a comparative study of measurements of specimen volume in 30 mastectomy cases. Breast Cancer (Auckl). Mar 27 2011;5:43-52. doi: 10.4137/BCBCR.S6128.
6. Choppin SB, Wheat JS, Gee M, Goyal A. The accuracy of breast volume measurement methods: A systematic review. Breast. Aug 2016;28:121-9. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2016.05. 010.
7. Regnault P. Breast ptosis. Definition and treatment. Clin Plast Surg. Apr 1976;3(2):193-203.
8. Qiao Q, Zhou G, Ling Y. Breast volume measurement in young Chinese women and clinical applications. Aesthetic Plast Surg. Sep-Oct 1997;21(5):362-8. doi: 10.1007/s00266990 0139.
9. Kalbhen CL, McGill JJ, Fendley PM, Corrigan KW, Angelats J. Mammographic determination of breast volume: comparing different methods. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Dec 1999;173(6):1643-9. doi: 10.2214/ajr.173.6.105 84814.
10. Trần Văn Thiệp, Huỳnh Hồng Hạnh, Trần Việt Thế Phương, Nguyễn Đỗ Thùy Giang. So sánh thể tích tuyến vú đo bằng phương pháp nhũ ảnh và phương pháp giải phẫu. Tạp chí Ung thư học Việt Nam. 2016;4:89-96.
11. Bulstrode N, Bellamy E, Shrotria S. Breast volume assessment: comparing five different techniques. Breast. Apr 2001;10(2):117-23. doi: 10.1054/brst.2000.0196.